Google Censorship

File: yahoo mm.png (19KB, 709x324px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 709x324px

This is what Yahoo looks like when you type in:

"Marilyn Monroe w"

Without makeup is the 5th fucking result.

>censorship
Do you americunts know that cooperations aren't the government?

>>56884957
>using google
#proudtobe
#reportanyytvidsyoudontagreewith
#nowomenscienceemojis
#noforcedagenda

>>56884996
I can't help it, they're too convenient.

Find a more convenient service and I'll switch.

>something doesn't show up in a typeahead feature
>censorship

Stop being a lazy shit and type what you want to search for.

>>56885085
for?

>>56885099
it used to though, the issue is theyre removing and censoring way to much stuff that doesnt fit a feminist liberals views

>>56885099
>Stop being a lazy shit and type what you want to search for.
Are you legitimately retarded?

It's one of the first things on every other search engine.

fuck off google shill

Google has an autocomplete function? I haven't gotten that shit to work in years

File: joogle.png (386KB, 1898x512px) Image search: [Google]

386KB, 1898x512px

>>56884957
Google is always trying to push a far left political agenda

>>56884957
Google has gone full liberal shill now.

They also filter search results to be favorable to Hillary Clinton and unfavorable to Donald Trump.

>>56884990
Lol

File: fag.png (899KB, 1267x649px) Image search: [Google]

899KB, 1267x649px

>>56884957
Censorship my ass. I literally got what I was searching for. Go back to /pol/ and bitch about it there.

>>56887308
bullshit
what I think is the case is that their machine learning eventually learnt that donald trump is a lizard man and no longer associates him with the 2016 election.

>>56887308
You do realise they filter results to fit your point of view so you don't get challenged in your beliefs, right?

>>56884990

Are you 12 and what is this?

>>56887308
I don't believe you, that would just take things too far. Source?

>>56887308
nah it mirrors your interests. if you go reading about shillary, it will tell you shillary is great. if you go reading about trump it tells you trump it great.

I pretty much only browse meme related news and all i get is ads targetted at CEOs. business consultancy firms in my ads mfw im a neet.

Tangentially related

http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/world-news/google-works-closely-with-hillary-clinton-to-promote-presidential-campaign-julian-assange-34780998.html

>>56887440
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFxFRqNmXKg

I tried it myself when it first came out and confirmed, but they may have changed it after getting caught.

I wouldn't exactly call that censorship. You can still search for Marilyn Monroe without makeup, you just need to finish typing it and click search

I just looked and there are a lot of celebrities names that you can follow with the word "without" and it produces no suggestions.
I hardly think that's censorship

>>56887496

>Fortune reported last year that researchers had found that "Google search rankings could potentially decide the outcome of an election".

>Through five experiments in two countries... biased rankings in search results can shift the opinions of undecided voters by 20% or more, sometimes even reaching as high as 80% in some demographic groups.

>If Google tweaks its algorithm to show more positive search results for a candidate, the researchers say, the searcher may form a more positive opinion of him or her.

>>56887560
>I just looked and there are a lot of celebrities names that you can follow with the word "without" and it produces no suggestions.
>I hardly think that's censorship


Marilyn Monroe without makeup is a hugely popular thing to search though. People specifically wanted to see how she looked without makeup because it was radically different.

It's huge on yahoo and bing.

Why is it not on autocomplete on google?

>>56884990
Do you know that censorship and government censorship aren't the same thing? Are you one of these retards who confuses "first amendment" with "freedom of speech"?

>>56887621
>>56887560
ALSO

"Without makeup" has a huge number of search results if you actually google it.

it's much more compared to "with glasses", which is the first thing on the autocomplete list

They're CLEARLY censoring it

>>56887631
>>56884990
>they aren't the government so you have no reason to complain about it

You people are killing america.

File: newsarticle.png (402KB, 1252x709px) Image search: [Google]

402KB, 1252x709px

>>56884957
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2016/10/01/youtube-blocked-trailer-for-christian-movie-im-not-ashamed-for-months-film-execs-say.html

Google owns Youtube if you didn't know.

>>56887651
this isn't censorship, you can still search for these things, and the actual results aren't manipulated (as far as I can tell)

This is like saying that a guy who finishes sentences for you is censoring out everything that he thinks you aren't going to say

its just not censorship.

>>56887670
Read my post again >>56887631
I'm agreeing with you.

File: youtubesearch.png (230KB, 1279x679px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 1279x679px

>>56887712
>Also this

Why would Google not censor this, since Google owns Youtube?

>>56887723
>hiding the most searched key words because they offend you

That's the definition of censorship.

Are you sure you're on the right board?

File: snapshot_24.46_[2016.09.27_07.07.45].png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>56887428

I don't think its because of sjw pressure they're a corporating and don't give a shit about whiny brats. They may have sign the EU anti hate speech bullshit, but in their own interests. They want the internet to be a controlled environment like TV and radio and libtards are the way to do it. Computing forever made a vod about it (YouTube demonetization) and I scoffed until YouTube hero's bullshit.

>>56887748
>Why would Google not censor this, since Google owns Youtube?
Because they want the public to think they're not overtly censoring things?

Google news posts news from all over the political spectrum.

If they suddenly stopped this, it would be big news.

>>56887354
>>56887440
>>56887494

Google is literally trying to manipulate the US election by skewing search results.

Here is the proof and numerous other investigators have shown the same thing:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFxFRqNmXKg

>>56887795
Makes sense.

>>56887791
This. I think most corporations are using leftards for there own gain rather than genuinely giving a shit about their agenda

>>56887806
And more

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_tWyvnH0xY

>>56887428
It actually has hits if you do it without the question mark.

>>56887763

by this threads rational if they didn't provide any suggestions whatsoever it wouldn't be considered censorship

Its a fucking search engine, you have to type in what you're searching for. You can't just only use what searches are suggested to you and assume the rest is censored out

just because the suggestions may be biased doesn't mean google is censoring out material from searches

>>56884990
>Jewgle is shilling Killary
>Big Jews are shilling for Jewgle and Killary
>it ain't the government D:<

no real alternatives
>yahoo is literal botnet
>bing is literal botnet
>ddg and the like are questionable
kill me now

>>56887346
>niggers
What the fuck did you search for before that to get this suggested?

>>56887670
This

>>56887906
samefag again

for the record I do think google censors search results, I just don't think that the real-time search suggestions are a valid indicator of the censoring of search results

>>56887282
>inventors
>Edison
top kek gr8 b8 m8 will masterb8

>>56887712
This is a pathetic "news" story tbqh.
Video got mistakenly flagged, then somebody noticed and reinstated it. YouTube (not Google search) explicitly censors things like porn and gore, that's no secret. What do you think the "secret agenda" here was? Anti-Christianity? Give me a fucking break.

D U M B
U
M
B

>>56888068
>Anti-Christianity

Are you going to pretend like that isn't a thing?

Shit thread OP, lurk more.

>>56887806
Are you serious?
Autocomplete is not search results. How did you fuck that one up?

>>56884957
They now implement sjw style censorship using deep learning trained on tumblr .

>>56888189
How many Christian videos are there on YouTube?
Why would this specific one be a target for censorship?
Get a fucking clue.

>>56888068
Why do you put anti christanity in quotes as if every leftard in the world doesn't have a hate boner for jesus

>>56888313
Anyone with a brain dislike the cuckmaster jesus "holy christ why are you kissing terrorists" "christ on stick stop letting them buttfuck you in the ass" "dead jew" christ.

How many pictures of Marilyn Monroe do you think got taken back in those days without makeup you stupid cunt?

>>56887670
make a better one lol

>>56888313
I didn't. Learn to read, retard