WebM thread

First I will discuss how I was able to turn extremely bloated images into tiny compact WebMs. Basically all you need is ffmpeg installed and a desktop windows OS.

The following are scripts which can convert entire directories of images into tiny compact WebMs.

JPG

for %%f IN (*.jpg) do (
ffmpeg -loop 1 -i "%%~nf.jpg" -an -c:v libvpx -qmin 16 -qmax 16 -crf 16 -quality best -threads 4 -t 2 -r 1  "%%~nf.webm"
)

PNG

for %%f IN (*.png) do (
ffmpeg -loop 1 -i "%%~nf.png" -an -c:v libvpx -qmin 16 -qmax 16 -crf 16 -quality best -threads 4 -t 2 -r 1  "%%~nf.webm"
)

Next I will discuss how to turn GIFs or videos into WebMs.

Script for GIF to WEBM:

for %%f IN (*.gif) do (
ffmpeg -i "%%~nf.gif" -an -c:v libvpx -qmin 0 -qmax 40 -crf 20 -b:v 1000k "%%~nf.webm"
)
pause

If you want to convert videos to WebMs simply make a copy of the script above and replace all mentions of .gif to mp4/mkv or whatever.

This is retarded.

Ideally 4chan would support uploading webp images, as well as vp9 webm.

>>56762707
>Ideally 4chan would support uploading webp images, as well as vp9 webm.
VP9 is pretty cpu intensive so I can kinda understand the aversion to it at least for another 2 or so years. Not supporting webp is pretty dam retarded though, it's a great all in one image format that replaces PNG, JPG, and even GIF.

File: Red-tailed Hawk.png (651KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

651KB, 1600x1200px

Here is an example of why I encode images to Webp.

File size: 652KB

File: Red-tailed Hawk.webm (69KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 1600x1200px

>>56762788
Now here is the WebM version of it.

File size: 69KB

It's literally ~10% the file size of the PNG. While there is quality loss it is not as huge as some of you make it out to be.

File: 1474738599518.jpg (225KB, 1600x1200px)

225KB, 1600x1200px

>>56762788
>>56762816

This is a bad example because PNG is not the right format for that kind of image, seeing images that big and of that subject in PNG is really quite rare.

Even at 98% quality of the PNG, that image in JPG format is at a file size more than OK for today or 10 years ago internet speeds.

>>56762906
I guess but my main point here is how efficient VP8 (which is used in WebP) is at compressing images.

JPG needs 2X the file size to achieve similar quality of VP8 images. While this may not mean much at low resolutions it can make a world of difference in 4K and higher res images.

>>56762696
but how do I make 1:30min webms with decent quality and audio but under 4mb

>>56762601
Check the archive for making 1 frame WebMs.

Fun fact: WebP was support in the beta version of the latest Mac OS but was removed before the final release.

>>56762964
You can't.

You can only complain about it on /qa/ where Hiro won't read it anyway

>>56762964
Only solution would be to reduce the resolution to ~360p and play around with the CRF and QMIN/QMAX settings until something clicks. Depending on how much movement there is in the video this can be pretty challenging. Also just encode Vorbis at 48kbps, video is more important than audio desu.

File: html.2345214.jpg (221KB, 996x1000px)

221KB, 996x1000px

>>56762601
Why? What is your goal with this? Why would anyone do this in [current year]? Can I send you a blue textile? Cause your control group clearly forgot it.

Just stop.

Dont forget ffplay and ffprobe.

File: 1474739536443.webm (112KB, 996x1000px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 996x1000px

>>56763051
M8 I just want to show people that JPG and PNG are fucking garbage and need to go away.

>>56763087
I never use those, don't see what benefit they would provide.

>>56762601
thank you based webm poster

you keep doing what you're doing

>>56763108
But why?????

What would anyone gain from this?

If your are really sick, I mean you truely have autism I sorry for you.

>>56763132
Glad you appreciate my work.

>>56763150
Maybe people will realize that we should finally adopt webp at least on 4chan. You see no matter how fast your internet connections is, 4chan cannot deliver content to you at say 1Gbps. So if smaller file sizes are used for images then there will be less strain on 4chin servers and everyone can get their content faster. Everybody wins.

File: 1467192656387.gif (2MB, 660x495px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 660x495px

Here is an example of why I encode GIFs to Webms

File size: 2.49MB

File: 1467192656387.webm (196KB, 660x495px) Image search: [Google]

196KB, 660x495px

>>56763221
Now here is the WebM version of it.

File size: 197 KB

Less than 8% the file size of the big fat GIF.

Bump. This is the most interesting thread I've seen all day.

stuff i kept in a txt file, copied from early webm threads when this was new

ffmpeg -i your_video.mkv -ss 00:00:10.000 -to 00:00:20.000 -c:v libvpx -crf 4 -b:v 1500K -vf scale=640:-1 -an output.webm

ffmpeg -v verbose -i "INPUT_FILE.mkv" -ss 00:07:18.43 -to 00:07:56.47 -threads 1 -pass 1 -quality best -slices 8 -auto-alt-ref 1 -lag-in-frames 16 -an -sn -vf scale=-1:-1 -c:v libvpx $BITRATE -f webm NUL -y
ffmpeg -v verbose -i "INPUT_FILE.mkv" -ss 00:07:18.43 -to 00:07:56.47 -threads 1 -pass 1 -quality best -slices 8 -auto-alt-ref 1 -lag-in-frames 16 -an -sn -vf scale=-1:-1 -c:v libvpx -b:v $BITRATE -f webm NUL -y

replace threads with however many cores your processor has, and bitrate with (3*8192)/LENGTH_OF_SELECTION_IN_SECONDS

also you can have the -fs option set a hard limit on your video, expressed in bytes like -fs 3000000

hope this helps, from /g/

subtitles

actually yes, also I'm samefag from /g/
how to embed subs:

This is for dumping fonts for videos that use custom ones, mostly for weeb shit:
ffmpeg -v verbose -dump_attachment:t "" -i "Video.mkv

ffmpeg -v verbose -i
Find the stream for your subs
e.g. #0.3 would be stream 3

ffmpeg -v verbose -i "Video.mkv" -ss 00:02:00.00 -to 00:04:00.00 -an -vn -codec:s:3 ass subs.ass

then, just put subtitles under the filters when you go to encode the video, like so: -vf scale=640:-1,subtitles=subs.ass

this might not work completely on windows the first time though because you might run into fontconfig errors. I'm not entirely familiar with them or what fixes them since I don't run windows.

try enclosing the filter arguments in quotes
like -vf "scale=-1:-1,subtitles=subs.ass"
or try ass=subs.ass instead of subtitles

>>56763250
its dicks like you that keep me from fapping to all the fucking webms on /gif/ on my iPhone

#makegifgreatagain

>>56766015
>his phone can't display webms
haha what?

File: Android 6 MultiWindow on Xperia Play.webm (876KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

876KB, 1280x720px

/g/ webm thread? /g/ webm thread

>>56766015
>pay $700
>can't view webms

>>56766015
>iPhone

Even Windows phone can view 4chan webm.

I've seen the light, OP. Your autism worked.
We definitely need to replace JPG and PNG with something more efficient.

WebP seems to only be supported in Chrome, though.

File: jpeg_60.jpg (69KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 1600x1200px

>>56762816
And here is a jpeg that size? Why the fuck use a video codec for pictures, when jpeg is already good enough, wider supported and easier to handle by hw and sw?

>>56766196
The webm is slightly better, though. Anyway, OP's point is not that we should start using webm for pictures.

>>56766196
Exactly.

Methinks OP is just trying a little too hard to be hip

Time to shill the script I made that lets you quickly and easily make several webm clips from the same source file which conform to the 3 MB limit (4 with sound) and creates log files.

https://github.com/richman-stallard/webm-by-dbt

File: ScrnShot_2016Sep24-14:46.jpg (162KB, 1170x460px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 1170x460px

>>56766194
the webp package includes vwebp

File: Gay.jpg (73KB, 1129x324px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 1129x324px

>All these filty casuals not using two pass encoding or avisynth scrips as input

>>56766244
>The webm is slightly better, though
It's not.

>>56766480
>le encoding wizard

>>56766060
Is the Xperia Play multitudes more powerful than a PSP?

>>56766365
Thanks Richman.

File: Xperia_Play_Android_601_Multiwindow.jpg (448KB, 1920x1305px) Image search: [Google]

448KB, 1920x1305px

>>56766611
Yes

>>56766667
OFF BY ONE

>>56766196
#REKT

>>56762601
Do you have a script that does all of the following?
>set custom width & height
>set start time & end time
or
>set start frame & end frame
>X threads & two-pass
and it would use as much calculated bitrate possible to reach exactly 3,145,728 bytes or 4,194,304 bytes.
I do this manually and it takes way too many trial and error encodes to reach 3,145,728 bytes.

File: 1465426907213.gif (2MB, 287x240px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 287x240px

>webp isn't supported by firefox
>js shim enables webp support for firefox
>displays webp in client browser in webm container
>everybody on 4chan blocks js

File: a.webm (3MB, 720x480px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 720x480px

>>56762964
combination of;
- low movement/complexity content
- low resolution
- avoid adding unnecessary keyframes

File: tes3to1414.webm (3MB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 720x1280px

>>56766816


encoders are too unpredictable

most of my shit comes to 2.90-3mb or 3.90-4mb so it's good enough for me

also i'd rather do the video editing on a gui editor instead of the command line

>>56766896
Firefox announced that they're adding native WebP.

>>56762601
We have a wiki for a reason.

>>56767557
They also announced they would support VP9 youtube streams.

>>56762644
-vframes 1 stupid

>>56767620
If it's broken then don't fix it. I get a feeling that will fuck up the output somehow.

>>56762601

As a fellow autist I order you to cease and desist OP.

File: Tenshi-Wallpaper-angel-beats-31411388-1600-900.webm (89KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 1600x900px

>>56767683
>no fun allowed
Good luck with that.

Keep it up

File: tom.webm (153KB, 287x240px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 287x240px

>>56766896

>>56767912
>16X smaller
noice

>>56762816
>there is quality loss
Stopped reading there

File: 280.webm (29KB, 900x505px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 900x505px

>>56768174
>expects a smaller file
>demands no quality be lost
kys

>>56768197
Lossless compression is a thing you know.

>>56768210
Yeah but it doesn't save much space. Webp in lossless encoding mode (RGBA) will only shave off like 25% off a heavily compressed lossless PNG.

File: maxreswhatever.jpg (62KB, 553x550px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 553x550px

>>56767683

>>56762644
>>56762696
How do I run this?

please respond

File: 1458261888929.png (1017KB, 680x382px) Image search: [Google]

1017KB, 680x382px

>>56768197

>>56766196

>Massive loss of image sharpness on the birds

Wow, this is the power of jpeg.

>>56768249
That's beside the point, >>56768197 was implying it's impossible to reduce file sizes without loss of quality which isn't necessarily the case.

>>56768265
>install ffmpeg
>open notepad in windows
>save as script.bat
>select all files type
>put it in a folder with images
>double click on it
wow

>>56763150
Edge cucks can't see this lel

File: douchebag_autismo.jpg (635KB, 1080x1445px)

635KB, 1080x1445px

>>56763150

He does have autism. It's the same fucking douchebag that keeps posting pic related all the damn time. In fact, he probably made the image to begin with.

File: tux.webm (66KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 1280x853px

>>56763051
>>56762707
>>56762906
>>56763150
>>56766015
>>56766196
>>56766298
>>56766494
>>56767638
>>56767683
>>56768361
>>56768514
heathens who cant see the light

File: tux.jpg (1MB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x853px

>>56768597

Fuck off, douchebag autismo

Just wait another 5 years for FLIF to become stable.

>>56762601
What about WebP?
https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/

>>56768651
4chan doesn't support webp

>>56768631
>66kb
>1mb

>>56768514
Those are all objectively good reasons why you should never invest in an iPhone. Why are you hating on it?

>>56763108
is that lewis hammilton?

>>56768678
This. Hope our new owner finally lets us upload webp images.

>>56768741

I'm not hating the image you jackass. I hate Apple.

I hate the fucking asshole that posts it and his webms even more than Apple and I didn't think that was possible.

>>56768764
>sent from my iPhone

>>56762788
Lossless WebP version is 114kB.
I hate to admit it but Jewgle did a good job.

https://aww.moe/za0hg2.webp

>>56768764
Well looks like hard days are ahead of you pal. This thread just exposed his autism and is infecting others. Soon only static webms will be used for images on 4chan (unless webp is allowed).

Also you do kinda sound like an undercover itoddler desu. What he does pisses iPhone users off because either they can't open webms or have to jump through numerous hoops to do so.

>>56768779
wtf...

>>56768794
you know this isn't the first time this has happened, right?

File: 1474763413504-min.jpg (64KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 1280x853px

>>56768719

>>56768808
Yeah but I get the feeling it will generate popularity /g/entoomen. After all, pissing off aplel users is a great pastime activity for us all.

Please stop posting your dumb static webms. They're always encoded to look worse than the original image, they can't be returned to thumbnail by clicking on them (you need to click the [Close] button), and transparency doesn't work on Chromium or Firefox.

Wait for WebP.

>>56768837
>Wait for WebP
You gonna tell us to wait for Zen+ as well fucboi?

>>56768840
No, I don't care about your thinly veiled /v/ shit

>based webm-san saving 4chan

Thanks OP, you're a cool guy.

File: nope.webm (945KB, 948x738px) Image search: [Google]

945KB, 948x738px

>>56768775
>>56768794

Nope.

File: 1474763413504.webm (31KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 1280x853px

>>56768818
Let's go a little lower shall we?

File: 1474763413504-min.jpg (28KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 1280x853px

>>56768866

>>56768892
>>56768818
So much noise

>>56768892
Why does the file size go up to 38KB when I save it? Did you hack 4chan?

>>56768913
Are you using a shitty operating system?

>already has the jpeg version on their PC
>converts it to webm
>uploads converted version so other people can also enjoy saving kilobytes of data

This is why you are 100% autism
no one but you gives a shit about this.

File: Screenshot_2016-09-24-21-00-57(1).jpg (36KB, 720x480px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 720x480px

>>56768952
I'm on Windows 7. Also tried to download your image on my Android phone running lollipop, same thing. I'm not gonna report you but how did you fake the file size? I'm amused.

>>56768966
but muh internet cap
muh loading times

>>56768966
Then why are 37 posters in this thread including (You)?

>>56769003

Don't visit a fucking image board then and use a text browser.

>>56769003
You realize smaller image file sizes improve loading times across all internet connections right? Even if you have a 1Gbps internet connection it doesn't mean 4chab can serve you shit at those speeds.

>>56769011

No one gives a shit about this fucking "mission". The number of posters could mean whatever the fuck you want it to, or not. Stupid fag.

>>56769026
You can also use Opera and enable compression.

Anyway this is still pretty useful for high res images (4K+). Hope 4chan adopts webp soon so we can leave behind JPG and PNG for good.

File: 1467834615932.webm (760KB, 640x384px) Image search: [Google]

760KB, 640x384px

>>56769047
Why are you so upset? It's as if you were an itoddler having problems with webm or something.

>>56768995
>im not gonna report you
>how did you fake the file size
kek

File: cock.webm (603KB, 960x576px) Image search: [Google]

603KB, 960x576px

>>56769074

Nah. You're just a cock m8

File: 1474761032923.webm (45KB, 451x619px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 451x619px

https://my.mixtape.moe/tcxluu.webm

ffmpeg -i bad_apple.flv -filter_complex 'format=rgba[t];[t]colorchannelmixer=rr=0:gg=0:bb=0:aa=0:ar=1[s];[s]lutrgb=a=(negval-2)*1.01' -pix_fmt yuva420p -y bad_apple_alpha.webm

File: 1470161352804.webm (11KB, 450x540px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 450x540px

What about FLIF, its lossless so it doesn't trigger the different kind of autists and offers much better compression ratios? Its progressive loading could even be used for thumbnails saving Hiro even more bandwidth

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ByH7RMsMxBY

>>56770460
It's been in alpha development for eons so we can safely say it's DOA. Beside Webp has lossless RGBA encoding which is 25-50% more efficient than lossless PNG so FLIF is not needed.

>>56770046
What were you trying to accomplish? All I saw was a black still background with weeb music playing.

File: autism.jpg (26KB, 567x561px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 567x561px

>>56770046
>>56770460

>>56770508
>'format=rgba[t];[t]colorchannelmixer=rr=0:gg=0:bb=0:aa=0:ar=1[s];[s]lutrgb=a=(negval-2)*1.01'
probably invert values

>>56770508
except it isn't, it actually takes puts white shit in transparent, it looks pretty cool

And how do you do this in Linux?

>>56770551

swap ffmpeg for avconv

>>56770551
If you can't modify what op posted to work maybe you should just close the terminal window and never open it again. Blindly running scripts found on internet is a terrible idea anyway

>>56770547
Hmm can you show me a screenshot of what we should be seeing? Also what program did you use? Chrome and Opera just display a black background.

>>56770551
Fuck knows, why are you even using a server OS? Are you still at work? If so then you should really wait until you get home and book up your windows PC to get on 4chan m8.

>>56770498
new release just few days ago senpai

>>56770584
>avconv
holy shit, kys. ffmpeg works just fine, no need to use that sjw-shait that is intentionally breaking APIs left and right just because they got some sand in they vajayjays

File: 2016-09-25_00-26-15.png (149KB, 1274x742px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 1274x742px

>>56770597
chrome, it looks awesome tbqh being 60 fps makes it even better

>>56770640

kys captain autismo

>>56770640
>new release just few days ago senpai
>"WARNING: FLIF is a work in progress. The format is not finalized yet. Any small or large change in the algorithm will most likely mean that FLIF files encoded with an older version will no longer be correctly decoded by a newer version. Keep this in mind."

http://flif.info/index.html

Still in alpha development so DOA like I said. FLIF is pretty much the daala of image codecs.

File: tcxluu-002.webm (2MB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x480px

>>56770646
Uploading a short section of that webm in 4chan friendly format. I can only play that .moe link in fullscreen unfortunately.

>>56770662
>"DOA"
>Initial release 3 October 2015
>"Yeah, they can't even finish their project in a year so just use our Google VP8 instead :^)"

>>56770694
this looks all black

>>56770719
Hmm all I did was mux it into another webm with mkvtoolnix. Either that fucked it up anon is trolling us.

>>56770758
>>56770694

yours look black, mine doesn't. if you are playing it with your browser make sure its not completely black the background or if its a video player do the same

>>56770758
not him
can confirm this issue, my system is shit though.
opened in mpv and mplayer does same issue

File: lolautism.jpg (20KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 1280x853px

>>56768892
>>56768866
We have to go deeper.
webm btfo :3

>>56770710
By now they should have finalized decoder and just a work in progress encoder. They don't. Either FLIF is being abandoned by devs or they could not deliver.

Also while Webp does use code from the VP8 video codec it's not the same. It's obviously better for compressing images and features RGBA lossless compression as well.

>>56770816
Why is that JPG 20KB when I download it?

File: 1474763413504.jpg (141KB, 367x502px)

141KB, 367x502px

>>56770816
wtf...

Are you hacking 4chan?

File: Untitled.png (24KB, 367x502px)

24KB, 367x502px

>>56770918
Get off my 4chan you fucking hacker.

File: wew.png (101KB, 960x531px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 960x531px

>>56770873
No.
This is all I did.

>>56770935
Oh wait you're that autist using a SJW mozjpeg JPG encoder aren't you? Well mozjpeg turned out to be a huge joke that is full of decoding problems. 4chan will automatically convert your mozjpeg shit to normal JPGs and serve those to everyone.

I like this thread

>>56770959
I'm using libjpeg-turbo

>>56771006
No you're not. Otherwise 4chan wouldn't need to convert your abomination to a normal JPG with 2X the file size.

File: 1474763413504-min.jpg (8KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 1280x853px

>>56770931

>>56771032
I am lol.

>>56771033
Jesus christ almightly.

>>56771032
https://sourceforge.net/p/libjpeg-turbo/mailman/message/27756109/

>>56771046
Then something is wrong with your encoder. Not surprising since you're using loonix shit. Broken software is expected with that OS.

>>56771033
Someone make an 8 KB webm version

File: thanks for picking me up from school daddy.webm (797KB, 1064x674px) Image search: [Google]

797KB, 1064x674px

>using webm for retards
>the quality of the video always suffers
Is this unavoidable or a compromise for file size? As in, could the quality be retained albeit at a larger (but smaller than conventional mp4/mkv/etc) file sizes?

>>56771060
Naw its normal for libjpeg-turbo to increase the file size by as much as 2x depending on the settings you use.

>>56771075
What I'm saying is something is wrong with the JPGs you encode because 4chan serves another version of your uploaded JPG 2X the file size. If you have a normal JPG then 4chan will use the same version you uploaded and serve that to everyone.

File: durr.png (260KB, 960x1062px)

260KB, 960x1062px

>>56771108
That doesn't mean something is wrong with my image lol ur fukin dumb kid.

File: autismo.webm (7KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 1280x853px

>>56771067
how did I do?

File: 8047.jpg (34KB, 552x708px)

34KB, 552x708px

You all scream autism but you have to remember that is was autism that brought us: the dictionary, out of the MPEG-1 dark ages, and so much more. Hopefully 4chan finally adopts webp so we can all move on with our lives and not have to cram images into static webms to save space.

>>56771165
Oh shit lmao.

You're doing gods work, OP

Keep it up. Fuck the mods or janitors and fuck hiroshima and fuck these reddit whiners in here.

>>56771184
>Keep it up. Fuck the mods or janitors and fuck hiroshima and fuck these reddit whiners in here.
do you grasp the context of the thread?

>>56771165
What command did you use?

>>56771165
That actually looks amazing for 8KB, holy shit. Do a 8KB JPG, it will probably have severe color bleeding and a fuckton of artifacts.

File: out.jpg (4MB, 4096x995px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4096x995px

what do you need webm for?
what can it do that jpeg can't?

i="out.jpg"; ffmpeg -r 10 -pix_fmt monob -f rawvideo -s 160x120 -i <(convert "$i" rgb:- | head -c 5222400) -f u8 -c:a pcm_u8 -ar 32000 -ac 1 -i <(convert "$i" rgb:- | tail -c +5222401) -c:v rawvideo -f nut - | mpv -

>>56771165
It even downloads to 8 KB unlike the JPG.

>>56771220
baka see
>>56771033

>caring about filesize where storage is cheaper than dirt

File: Screenshot_2016-09-25-00-36-07(1).jpg (39KB, 720x486px)

39KB, 720x486px

>>56771234
That's fucking spooky m8. Is it really 4chan converting a broken JPG into a normal one or did someone hack 4chan?

>>56763108
COURAGE

>>56771231
>what do you need webm for?
>what can it do that jpeg can't?
>File: out.jpg (3.82 MB, 4096x995)
when you convert audio/video using imagemagick the converted file size stays fairly close to the original file size

>>56771259
Storage isn't the problem, it's bandwidth, specifically the bandwidth 4chan has to serve you shit. You may have a 1, 000 Mbps internet connection but 4chan is limited to serving you things at ~8 Mbps. So basically smaller file sizes would improve loading times across all connections which is nice.

Yeah this may mean jack shit at low resolutions but it starts to add up especially above 480p images.

>>56767243
what show is this

>>56771317
>4chan is limited to serving you things at ~8 Mbps
That isn't true I just pulled >>56771306 at 23.28mbps

>>56771333
read or die

>>56771339
That's why I said "~". Though I doubt you can get those speeds during the day when mostly everyone is active here though.

>>56771400
>during the day

>>56771400
Pff you were just guessing, it isn't actually limited to anywhere near ~8mbps

>>56771418
>implying the world doesn't revolve around America

>>56771444
>implying

File: 1454155992873.gif (2MB, 500x367px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x367px

>>56771441
Yeah, I guess (heh).

>>56770046
Cool!

File: 1471126575534.webm (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>56771317
buy more captcha passes so Hiromoot can improve the servers

that's more realistic than either the userbase taking means to change their content or how it's produced


Unless you're suggesting 4chan converting the content uploaded to it would be a more efficient use of resources?

>tfw have no idea how this webm is so clean

>>56771317
I've literally never thought 4chan was running too slow to use.

>>56771531
Someone just needs to make a script or program that automatically converts their images to webms. People on /g/ would post them just to spite Apple users.

>>56771531
More money isn't guaranteed to increase available bandwidth

>>56771600
But you still have to wait for content to load. If said content was 50% smaller then you would wait 50% less. 2 seconds instead of 4. It would all add up long term.

>>56771639
kek this

>>56771639
That...idea has merit.

>>56768779
https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery

>>56772320
tfw palememe support it but ff don't.

>>56762816
>quality loss
DROPPED

fuck off
u
c
k
o
f
f

>>56766094
ban this autistic retard !!

>>56762816
I can't zoom in on that piece of shit

>>56768270
Are you retarded? Even the 60% jpeg looks clearly sharper than your shitty webm.

>>56766094
>tfw some part of me genuinely thinks that's cool
I hate me

File: 1474662225724.png (807KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

807KB, 1280x720px

>>56773649
Hiro won't let me post lossless VP9 so:

% du -sh what\ have\ we\ done* 1474662225724.png 
392K    what have we done-vp9lossless.webm
64K    what have we done.webm
808K    1474662225724.png

How do I shill for a sitewide audio webm support?

If you look at other imageboards that support audio, there was never a problem with that. All the fears that Moot held so dear were proven wrong. His legacy and vision is moot.

make me a gui program that I can use on my windows and I will happily support your autism op.

File: Illusion.gif (38KB, 460x460px)

38KB, 460x460px

op make this into a webm

File: MY EYES.webm (8KB, 460x460px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 460x460px

>>56774273
OP is faggot who uses terrible quality settings

>>56774307
ty

>>56773742
>All the fears that Moot held so dear were proven wrong.

He was bullshitting.

His real worry was that people would use webms instead of Jewtube embeds, using more 4chan bandwidth and cutting into his profits.

>>56766015
just get fucking vlc player for iOS and just watch 'em via that. Problem solved, faglord.
Next time buy a phone that decently supports 4chan memerys.

>>56766094
>not utilising the 3MB limit

>>56774453
There might be another part in this. There seems to be a deal between Google and 4chan over the captcha. Google might've been interested in getting traffic for Youtube from 4chan in return.

>>56774553
>There seems to be a deal between Google and 4chan over the captcha.

The Google captcha uses complex fingerprinting and they use it to track the user everywhere they go with cookies/ips/scripts so it's probably worth something.

Jewtube probably gets a lot of traffic anyway.

>>56774553
>>56774644
>>56774453
>>>/pol/

Fuck off, you stupid tin-foils. Not everything has some SUPAH SEKRET JEWISH MEANING behind it

>>56774653
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9099000

There's an article about it linked here.

I can't link the article directly since it's been put on 4chan's spam filter.

>>56774653
The way the capcha is used on 4chan does give google the technical ability to match what you post (despite it supposedly being anonymous) with the profile they have on you. Of course google is going to [ab]use that as profiling internet users is how they make their money

>>56771333
Looks like Read or Die. Not sure if that's from the OVA or the series.

>>56774644
>Jewtube probably gets a lot of traffic anyway.

What I'm saying is that 4chan gives some significant traffic back to Google/Youtube by using embedded videos. No audio and lack of support for webm on some platforms stalls the growth of the internal network of video sharing, Due to this Youtube sources get precedence. Google might've given a deal to Moot to keep webm at bay in exchange for catpcha services.

>>56774745
Google benefits from the captcha service on 4chan since they can use it to track all the goyim posting here.

see
>>56774712

The captcha here shares the data it gets with google's search engine, gmail, youtube, chrome, sites with google analytics, android etc.

>>56774783
>>
>The captcha here shares the data it gets with google's search engine, gmail, youtube, chrome, sites with google analytics, android etc.

source: my ass

>>56774793
How do you think Google knows you're not a robot beforehand?

>>56774801
behavioral cues, such as where users click, how long they linger over a checkbox, and their typing cadence

>>56774821
You do know it may fill in you're not a robot beforehand, irrelevant of the website? That means Google tracks your overall captcha progress.

>>56774793
you're an idiot but then of course this is /g/.

>>56774701
>There is no evidence Google is doing, or is planning to do, anything nefarious with the information the new No CAPTCHA reCAPTCHA scans and collects — and it's unlikely Google ever would use the data scraped through the software for advertising purposes.

wow its fucking nothing
amazing

>>56774926
>However, as AdTruth’s Collier pointed out, the key issue is a question of trust: Google’s own marketing around the launch of the No CAPTCHA reCAPTCHA is scant on details about the user data the software assesses, although the company did acknowledge in a blog post in 2013 that the software looks at engagement “before, during, and after” a CAPTCHA interaction.

>Business Insider could only find one article, from Wired, in which it was explained that Google also examines cookies and IP addresses alongside mouse movements and typing behaviour (but nothing to do with a fingerprint) to determine whether that user “is the same friendly human Google remembers from elsewhere on the web.”

File: 13092466_1698252443760480_265713593_n.jpg (18KB, 320x320px)

18KB, 320x320px

>>56774246
What is so hard about saving the script as a batch file and clicking on it?

>>56767541
FUCK you I'm here to learn not fap!!!!

>>56767541
>also i'd rather do the video editing on a gui editor instead of the command line
pussy

>>56766196
you can see some artifacts at the wings, wew

>>56768265
>>56762696
the bash solution

for f in *.gif; do 
    ffmpeg -i "$f" -an -c:v libvpx -qmin 0 -qmax 40 -crf 20 -b:v 1000k "${f/gif/webm}"
done

>>56778925
so bug ridden, never passes the junit