Is this what Linux users do?

File: 2016-09-21-202233_1091x370_scrot.png (21KB, 1091x370px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 1091x370px

>>56721145
fuck no, links/lynx is ass
w3m is the best terminal browser, it actually can display images
for the most part, using a terminal browser isn't worth it since it doesn't display images well, don't handle javascript, and has issues with CSS, though you can do a lot more in the terminal than you can on powershell or cmd on windows
firefox aurora and dillo are good GUI browsers on linux

>>56721145
Terminal is good in concurrency with Xorg. Both are tools to accomplish different things, and X may be old, but it works if you don't bog it down with a bunch of useless shit like a DE

>>56721363
> and X may be old, but it works if you don't use it
Fixed for you my friend

>>56721145
GUI started with Macintosh, you computer illiterate fucktard.

Is it just me or am I being reverse-memed to call winbabbies illiterate over and over again?

>>56721145
The only graphical program I use is the web browser, and GIMP.

Rest is TUI or CLI.

>>56721432
uh no? There's literally no better alternative atm

>>56721301
New firefox is shit. Pale Moon is also pretty shit, but it's still better then Firefox. Shame they went for the chrome feel and I'm not talking about fucking curved tabs

>>56721465
GUI started with Xerox you mong.

>>56721145
Terminals are really good for programming, hacking and quick and efficient computation.

If you need organization and an "environment", an IDE would be better, though they have a painful tendency to bloat themselves, so typically just an interpreter or compiler run through the command line is better for lower end systems, or simply being as light as possible on a ranges of hardware.

Typically I would use an IDE because I can or because I have to (refer to Android Studio with FTC).

>>56721522
Same, except I don't really use Gimp much anymore, just firefox because terminal browsing is now insufferable thanks to modern JS.

>>56721578
I am

>>56721746
explain urself

>>56721522
I am a professional graphic designer and I only use imagemagick

I use plenty of GUI applications on Linux. I also use plenty of CLI applications.

>>56721465
You reverse-memed yourself thinking the GUI started with the Macintosh

>>56721301
>doesn't handle javascript

People who run GUIs don't at least use noscript?

> Hurdurr, I'ma let every random website run arbitrary code on my computer

>>56721301
>teen girls
>code
kek

>>56723751
>IT industry
>no sexism problem
kek

>>56721145
There are things that need GUI, there are others than don't.

A terminal is handy for a lot of things, for example let's say you need to rename 100000 jpg and convert them to pdf.

If you have a terminal program that can convert jpg to pdf (like gimp cli) you only need a regex a for loop and a call to do it.

In Windows you might have to download special batch rename programs and a special batch file converter.

In Linux it's just there.

>>56721617
i think you're getting memed on.

but apple was the first company to market it at all. xerox kept it in-house for several years.

>>56723325
#preach

File: Capture du 2016-09-22 10-46-21.png (66KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 1366x768px

>>56721145
Both GUI and terminal.

>>56721534
Wayland

>>56724133
>What is powershell

>>56725826
Is Wayland in a releasable form now?

File: desktop.jpg (217KB, 1200x673px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 1200x673px

am i doing it right ???

>>56726035

I fucking hate those generic /g/ desktops too. They crash in on perfectly decent desktop threads with desktops that look identical outside of having a different colour and a different anime girl.

File: 1456323866605.jpg (2MB, 2000x1200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2000x1200px

>>56726035
Not really.

>>56726035
You're missing chink drawings of underage girls.

>>56721145
yea you do install the gui, cuz no1 likes to use the black terminal all the time, i mean, u use it a lot, and its nice , but you need some colors

>>56721578
Brave senpai, the developer is one of us.

>>56721301
Try using links -g and mpv+youtube-dl for playing videos

>>56721465
>GUI started with Macintosh
Holy fucking shit, you are so retarded.

>>56726065
i dont know why those anime faggots havent been banned yet

>>56724059
tits or gtfo

>>56726026
nope!

>>56725809
Fuck France

>>56725917
too hard for GNOMEbabbies

>>56726035
teach me.

hi there

>>56721301
>dildo
>browser

>>56727739
STOP SHILLING FOR A STUPID ADWARE.

>>56727758
this

File: Screenshot from 2016-09-23 02-05-48.png (114KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 1366x768px

I'd say Linux is as adorable as my snow-white cat :3

File: 1474546773712.jpg (48KB, 656x572px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 656x572px

>>56729736
looks good.im more of a dark theme guy though.

>>56721739
Its time to head back to Usenet and Gopherspace

>>56721145
>I guess you don't install all the GUI programs[...]

I don't. Apart from Firefox, mpv, and Pidgin, I don't use any GUIs that I can think of.

But I'm not going to tell people not to. If people want to use GUI that's fine with me.

>>56725917
>Powershell
Images2PDFC /i "D:\My Images\*.jpg" /e "D:\My PDFs\images.pdf"

>Linux
convert page1.jpg page2.jpg +compress file.pdf

Gee, which one looks harder?

>>56726035
keked

>>56721522
What do you use?

>>56732324
>>56732324
The Slashes are terrible

>>56725826
it's a fucking meme, shit that actually can run on wayland is actually running some x11 shit underneath to actually work.
Wayland seems a good idea, but there's little support or reason to change atm

>>56727758
>dat awful gray background, retarded fonts and terrible X driver

Mpv is fine though.

>>56732254
What other software do you use?

>>56721145
Is there a terminal browser that works with 4chan, without having to buy a 4chan pass?

>sure.
I also watch my shows in binary, with sunglasses on.
Wake up anon, Linux users are the same as Windows users, just with a different approach.
Or do you think all Dodge drivers are bulky testosteroneguys where all Honda drivers are asians?

>>56723325
You clearly don't know how javascript on the browser works.

>>56727739
Good. Maybe he'll see this post and get off his ass and make twitter videos work instead of "hurr durr why are people using m3u to define video streams??? idiots are doing it wrong I will never implement this"

>>56727739
>a furfag
>one of us

>>56721145
No. I'm a Debian user. I have a full GUI and I use Firefox. KDE is my desktop environment.

>>56734360

> Javascript has never been vulnerable and will never be vulnerable

http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-16-282/
https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=39665
https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/912420
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2008-14/
https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/31519/
https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/18365/

Get fucked GUI babies:
https://www.owasp.org/index.php/3rd_Party_Javascript_Management_Cheat_Sheet
The invocation of 3rd party JS code in a web application requires consideration for 3 risks in particular:
The loss of control over changes to the client application,
The execution of arbitrary code on client systems,
The disclosure or leakage of sensitive information to 3rd parties.

>>56721145

Firefox, GIMP and Cinelerra are the only things that I use with GUIs. Honestly nobody cares if you use GUIs or not.