QUICK!! Post the best C ide/editor that runs on linux

>>56715197
Vim + gcc obviously

File: 1464586150837.jpg (205KB, 900x675px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 900x675px

acme, duh

vim

Vim is the best editor/IDE that runs on any platform.

And this is coming from someone who helped MS develop Visual Studio.

Clion.

>>56715512
>another ShitBrains meme IDE
No thanks.

What about Code Bocks

>>56715512
>paying for software

>>56715567
but i dont want cancer

>>56715206
This, or nano+gcc for no learning curve

IDLE

>>56715580
Me neither, that's why I use Sublime

>>56715297
Visual Studio is the best editor/IDE.

And this is coming from someone who helped develop vim.

Emacs

gedit with extensions.

geany.

>>56715602
sorry but you have cancer now

vim is the only editor, everything else is just bloat

>>56715206
/thread

Netbeans

File: laughing steveo.jpg (32KB, 453x500px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 453x500px

>>56715567

wine + notepad.exe
or dosbox + edit.com

>>56715197
Atom + atom-clang

eclipse :^)

File: da0.png (9KB, 273x312px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 273x312px

>>56715677
>dosbox + edit.com

>>56715575
> cannot into pirate

>>56715297
Atom + Vim Bindings > Vim

>>56715575
Free for students.

a-atom

>>56715744
Atom is garbage
>slow as fuck
>made with meme web dev technology
>doesn't even support muh QWERTZ

File: HmZQ8wy.gif (1MB, 495x278px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 495x278px

>>56715567
Literally this, best text editor.

>>56715197
ide are for women.

also this >>56715206
/thread

Qt Creator

Monodevelop ain't bad either, there's really quite a bit of choice.

>>56715197
nano, gcc

UltraEdit

>>56715609
c-mode is only compatible with gcc in emacs

Anjuta

>>56715197
visual studio code

>>56715197
vim+tmux+gcc+gdb+valgrind+man pages

>>56715609
This. A lot of people shit on emacs and claim that vim is so much better but once you actually try using emacs for a while and get used to it it's just fantastic.

>>56715197
Honestly, they all suck...

Clion. /g/poors will get mad though since they can't afford it.

Codelite.
Come at me fags.

>>56715609
It's a real comfy OS for sure, if just it had a decent editor...

>>56716421
codelite was my choice until I couldn't have errors inline with the code. Not sure if I broke it or what.

>>56715560
>ShitBrain
>meme IDE
Stop being a poorfag

File: 1323642424001.jpg (20KB, 413x324px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 413x324px

>>56715197
>C ide/editor

This is the equivalent to asking a bunch of chefs "What is the best type of fork?"

k d e v e l o p

>>56716459
Well somebody will surely hop in with a turd in hand claiming it's a good fork

>>56716479
Those are the Atom/JetBrains people.

>>56715793
>ide are for women.
t. professional FizzBuzz developer

>>56715197
What the fuck is this thing you call an IDE?

There's literally nothing that your fancy IDEs can do that EMACS can't.

>>56716559
Not-giving me Emacs Pinky?

>>56716551
something people with a job use.

>>56715197
Qt Creator

>>56716439
This as far as IDEs is the best free that just werkz. Code:blocks is OK as we well

Notepad (notepad++, if you're a jew)

>>56715575
>guy who uses codeblocks at work full time
codeblocks has random crashes and freezes, sometimes the debugger hangs for 2 minutes for no reason when stepping
I pretty much hate it to be honest
the gui builder is absolute trash

>>56715197
sandy+make+gcc
/thread.

>>56716597
evil mode, retard

>>56717099
Do you call transvestites "she"? Just curious

>>56717127
what the fuck are you talking about

>>56717132
Giving Emacs Vim clothes won't make it less shitty

>>56717168
that's implying vim is actually good in the first place, which is false

>>56717195
>implying emacs is worth a gnu/libre shit

people here who say vim or emacs are basement dwellers, no one who writes commercial software with thousands of files and tens of thousands of LoC is going to write make files by hand when you can have an IDE automatically generate that for you

>>56717213
stay mad nigga

>>56717302
I never mentioned Vim, you gnonsense-tossing baboon

>>56715197
vim

>>56717371
so if you don't use emacs bindings and you don't use vim bindings, what do you use? if you use arrow keys then you're a fucking mongaloid and you need to quit now

>>56715197

ed or TECO

>>56717421
>if he doesn't enjoy emacs bindings he is a mongoloid

Do you have any more of dem chromosomes?

>>56717475
i put 'arrow keys' are you even reading you fucking nigger

>>56717241
Richard Hendrix uses Emacs :^)

File: screenshot-20160921-16:52:30.png (101KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 1366x768px

Spacemacs or Vim with plugins

>>56717489
You clearly implied Vim users are retards previously too, Tyrone

>>56717241
That's because commercial software uses bad languages. Thousands of files and tens of thousands of lines to describe a set of processes only makes that software more brittle and harder to debug than software built with a better language in less lines of code.

The primary motivation is, of course, money. Companies whose software is not their primary product love replaceable sweatshop programmers who only knows bad languages, and consulting firms make millions managing other company's internal software (which is not their primary product).

Barring critical performance concerns, no company for whom their software is their primary product uses bad languages and bad software engineering practices and lasts long. If everyone in your company can't make do with a slim Vim or Emacs config and a command line, you've probably got a problem on your hands.

>>56717594
>If everyone in your company can't make do with a slim Vim or Emacs config and a command line, you've probably got a problem on your hands.

What does emacs/vi that eclipse/sublime/whatever can't?

>>56717742
can be run in console over ssh

>>56717780
>can be run in console over ssh

Meh

>>56717742
Be run from any Unix machine with little setup apart from moving over a config file.

Try working on an enterprise Java project on a machine that is not in the building and under DevOps' supervision. They will fucking roast you.

If your software is manageable with command line tools and editable with simple text editors, you can edit literally anywhere.

Not to mention that those config files I spoke of can contain packages and plugins and options that give Vim/Emacs IDE-scale refactoring and project management powers.

So you can edit portable projects anywhere with no fuss, or have a huge project with enormous dependencies that can only run on machines managed by people getting paid to do so.

K D E V E L O P

>>56715714
I taught myself C in 1997 following "C For Dummies" using edit.com and a C Compiler off a free disk.

File: gnome-builder-dark.png (392KB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]

392KB, 1680x1050px

Gnome Builder

>>56718926
I remember that C compiler
http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/

>>56715793
Have fun collaborating on an enterprise solution without one!

>>56715206
First post best post
/thread

Visual Studio Code with a gcc plugin

>>56715744
>Using web technologies for a text editor
Why the fuck would people think that this is a good idea?

>>56715605
kek