what if it sucks?
It will its AYYMD after all
then nothing changes and we all keep buying Intel chips for increasing prices for the next 5-10 years.
>buying ayymd
Lmao @ your life
>>56687540
>Mocks AMD
>Post a non-insulting-even-promoting-image.
Do you get paid in rupees or in usd?
>>56688279
anime=garbage
amd=garbage
>>56688508
I don't know, they look pretty hot
>>56687488
What if someone cared?
>>56688686
what if i was planning to use it for my next build?
>>56689189
me too senpai, also was gonna put it in my steam machine in the front room.
who cares x86 is dead
even jewtel can't make this shit faster anymore
enjoy the end of moore's law
>>56689580
>faster
Why does this matter?
>>56688647
weaboo detected
>>56689820
i want to protect her smile from going bankrupt
I doubt it'll suck. Maybe it won't be amazing, but by all indication it has the ingredients to be competent.
>>56690280
its AMD. You know they're gonna fuck it up.
Does it matter? Every time some new shit comes out you fags are all like "I'll just wait a couple of months for [next gimmick] instead"
>>56690336
Zen+ will beat the i7-9700k, you guys just watch.
>>56687488
Kind of hope it does suck in some perverse, schadenfreude way since I bought a 6600k and gigashyte z170 at the beginning of the year for a steal.
I'm not quite a fanboy, but I support AMD as the upstanding underdog, though they seem to have gotten shadier. Must have figured it works for nvidia and Intel fuck it.
Probably to sell my msi rx 470 when a reasonably priced hbm card seems inevitable and save money in the meantime. And hope the 6600k will hold me for 6 or so years with more juice.
>>56689820
anime website dumbass
As long as I can get a 20 core non-server cpu for like $300, it's all good.
>>56687488
Then you will have intel's dick up your ass for another 5 years
>>56687540
>>56687488
I think we as a species will still manage to survive somehow.
>>56687488
>yfw it's Haswell tier of performance
>>56687488
Let's see
https://warosu.org/g/thread/S8953199#p8953474
https://warosu.org/g/thread/S8677197#p8677484
https://warosu.org/g/thread/S8603710
Something like this except the year is 2017 and not 2011 and replace Sandy Bridge with Skylake or Kaby Lake
>>56692167
* haswell E or sky-lake
fix'd it for you.
>>56687488
No wonder amd stands for Another Major Disappointment
>>56687488
If it sucks then I get an i5 instead. Either way the wait sucks.
>>56691634
>>56691634
The best thing about this picture - AMDrones don't even realise that the difference between steady 60 fps and jumpy stuttering in 50s is massive and has a huge impact on controls response so in the end they're too stupid to know this picture is actually mocking AMD.
>>56687488
There's no real doubt that it'll suck, the question is what it's going to be priced at? CPUs have barely moved an inch from where they were 5-6 years ago, so even if it gets, say, Haswell performance, you're still looking at a mere 5~10% less IPC than the latest Skymeme.
The real deal breaker is whether we're getting "real" 8-core chips for the price of current 6 or even 4-core offerings from Intel, because then AMD will snag the X99 rug right from under them, and even tide some potential Z170 buyers over.
>>56692269
>Bulldozer is coming to AM3
also, better performance per clock than i7
fucking
KEK
with all the Zen overhype i wonder how kuch of a disaster it will be this time
>>56687488
It will suck, look at RX460/470 and RX480 they're horrible, what did AMD even think of.
>>56693253
>RX480 horrible
guess I want horrible Zens, then
40% IPC uplift over Excavator
No one should be expecting anything more than that.
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/1684?vs=288
Fanboys create the hype, AMD doesn't.
>>56687488
If it's on par with Haswell IPC wise I'd say it's good enough for me. That's if the bump up the cores and lower vs same price bracket intels.
Until graphene comes out, everything will suck from both Intel and AMD, because everything will be pointless and worthless in terms of performance increase.
wait for Zen+
>>56690730
/v/ GET OUT
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>56693973
5% average performance uplift per year at lower power isn't terrible if you upgrade every 5 years.
What do you think about Asian sloots /g/?
How much would you pay for them?
What value per performance are you looking for in them?
>>56692374
I bet you hyped up bulldozer as well
fucking trip fag
I'l still buy it.
>>56694061
lady boys if you are into finding surprises
>>56687488
Don't really care, I'm not looking for a fast processor. I just want something that's higher than quad core, has support for m.2 ssds and multithreading at a price below $500. If AMD can provide that then I'm sold.
>>56687488
>what if it sucks?
just wait for zen 2
> zen++;
the new meme