What's up next for intel's mobile chips? Atom is no more. Core M was pretty much a no go from the beginning - priced way too high, barely more efficient than an i series u chip but much slower, and nobody but apple wants them in their devices anymore. Is this the end of intel's mobile cpus?
>>56676260
ARM is superior anon, x86 will die.
Wait, Core M is discontinued? Source?
>>56676260
Wait till 2019 thats when Intel will introduce their new line of mobile cpus
>>56676302
Core M is not dead but its not competing in phone market. Its just a low power laptop cpu.
>>56676302
It's not discontinued, but by the looks of things it won't be long. It's ridiculously expensive compared to atom or arm, almost the same price as standard core chips.
So why the fuck did they drop Atom? They were almost there!
>>56676632
It was shit for today's standards and it only ran on Windows and iOS with full functionally the companies abandoned it for their own different reasons.
With ARM's sale, this seems the perfect time for Intel to capitalise on the market's uncertainty about ARM's future.
you all seem to be forgetting about the current celeron, in every cheapo laptop, Chromebook and every computer at walmart
>>56676632
They started calling them Pentium and Celerons starting from the Braswell.
As far as I know the Z8000 series are still in production.
Core M is still very alive, used in ultralights and tablets, my tablet uses a passively cooled Skylake Core M.
>>56676632
Atom needed two chips. Not a SOC.
To power hungry for mobile. Has a win 7 atom industrial PDA at work ... OS is shit for touch.
Arm is a reduced sequential pipeline POS. It will never run windows well, and will fail in any server endeavours.
Low performance per watt.