Thread replies: 6
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
Anonymous
Bedrock - the meta gnu/linux distro 2016-09-18 06:08:44 Post No. 56658605
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Bedrock - the meta gnu/linux distro 2016-09-18 06:08:44 Post No. 56658605
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: images.png (931B, 160x160px) Image search:
[Google]
931B, 160x160px
Bedrock seems to be an interesting meta-distro at first glance but it
has is no real usecase for it. Given the structure and obscurity (not even listed on dw) it is not suited for production but as a hands on desktop its bloated.
One seldom needs special version packages and often this can be achieved by using the instable/testing repository, by native selection (apt supports this) or my manual packaging.
Nobody needs a different init-system than systemd or the legacy ones that came with your outdated hipster distro.
Bedrock is a good research project but is not a day-to-day distro.
>>
>>56658605
>Nobody needs a different init-system than systemd
Did Lennart hire pajeet now
>>
>>56658620
Shhh... quiet good goy
>>
>>56658620
>every major d adopted systemd
less fragmentation
>handels dependencies
>start by sockets
>journalctl
whats your point, memehead?
>>
>i will review obscure os that no one knows about and not even shill for it
>>
>>56654147
>It's the objectively best Linux distro. If it gets a new kernel, it would be the objectively best operating system.
Isn't it based ot whatever you install, so why does it have an "old" kernel?
http://bedrocklinux.org/1.0beta2/concepts.html#under-the-hood
There is no reason why it should be
limited to older kernels.
Thread posts: 6
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1