Guess we were right, huh?

>>56642446
>95
>shit

File: 1418843432736.jpg (107KB, 1015x823px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 1015x823px

>>56642446
>Doesn't reference NT, 2000, 1-3
>ignores 8.1
Why can't this meme fucking die?

>>56642507
found this in one of my ancient folders from 2011

>>56642446
>windows telemetry
>good
please end your life and childish oversimplifications

>>56642446
retarded as fuck

File: 1456540252546.png (210KB, 633x1118px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 633x1118px

>>56642538
>ancient
>2011
ree

File: tmp_30344-b7e-115315596.gif (414KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

414KB, 400x300px

>>56642446
Doesn't this imply that 10 is good?

>>56642830
Right now its shit but eventually they will fix it i hope
I play vidya
Im gonna use a linux distro for everything else but it seems like windows 10 is going to be required for games in the next 5 years.

>>56642830
I count 8 and 10 to be the same. They like literally didn't change anything

File: CPU overheating troubleshoot.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>>56642866
>I count 8 and 10 to be the same. They like literally didn't change anything

You're this level of retarded.

>>56642446
8.1 good
10 shit

>>56642898
to an end user, it's basically the same

They essentially had a full open beta test with 8.1 for 10

File: 1424068838311.jpg (56KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 500x375px

>>56642931
thanks for not calling me a dumbshit anon and responding calmly to my retardation

>>56642898
Did that really happen?
He put a sticker on his CPU?

>>56642951
It's surprisingly common... There was another image of someone doing the same with an AMD CPU.

>>56642844
Windows has been always required to play videogames. Except for MS-DOS

>>56642951
>thought the sticker was one of the cpu cores

>>56642507
Same reason 98se is ignored.

>>56642975
hmm
I see your point

>>56642963
>>56642969

The 80+ temps that reached for sure would have fused the glue from the sticker to the heat spreader... That CPUs fucked.

>>56643037
Not really, you should be able to remove it with steel wool or at most sanding it.

File: 1455235972209.png (3KB, 133x217px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 133x217px

>>56642446
and as always
no
whoever thought of this switching quality idiocy has to be burned on a stake

>>56643105
>8.1 as a separate OS
might as well count all service packs for other ones then
Again, this "theme" was never correct in the first place

>>56642830
No, 8.1 comes after 8 which means that 8.1 is good ant 10 is bad.

>>56643105

>counts 8,1
>doesnt count 98 SE

>>56643105
10 Evil

Can I get a list of reasons why 10 is bad? I thought it counted as good since 8 was shit

>>56643037
Nah, bullshit. I would honestly just dip that CPU into acetone or comparable solvent to get the glue off. 80°C is really not that much, for sure not enough to cause any significant chemical reactions in the glue.

File: winsucks.png (895KB, 831x6941px) Image search: [Google]

895KB, 831x6941px

>>56644201

>95 shit
>NT good
>98 shit
>2000 good
>ME shit
>XP good
>Vista shit
>7 good
>8 shit
>8.1 good
>10 shit
fixed

>>56642446
1.0 shit
2.0 shit
3.0 shit
3.1 shit
3.11 slightly better
95 shit
98 slightly better
CE/ME slightly better
2000 good

NT pre 4.0 shit
NT 4.0 good
NT 5.0 aka XP shit

Vista good, but got a lot of heat because of UAC
7 quite good, but not as revolutionary as Vista was
8 very good
8.1 even better
10 no opinion

>>56642446
8.1 is the 98SE of 8. Something i'll bet the author of that image is too young to know about

>>56644124
duh that´s what i said

File: 1462593211452.png (106KB, 850x1659px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 850x1659px

>>56644234
>Windows 10 spies on you

no it doesn't

>>56644633
>Source: My ass

>>56644726
>Source: The privacy policy

>>56644633
fuck off street-shitter

>>56644633
Well written pajeet.

The problem is that despite some retarded usability problems, windows 8 was built on a solid base.

8.1 polished it and made it near perfect by solving the usability problems, it nearly had no bugs.

10 has both weird usability and is full of bugs.

Its shit right now, and I am not seeing it becoming any more stable with the updates.

File: face.png (139KB, 368x358px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 368x358px

>>56644747
>>56644750

nice, guys

>>56644760
10 has a terrible interface. It's more difficult to use than fucking linux.

File: what.gif (38KB, 291x320px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 291x320px

>>56644775
>It's more difficult to use than fucking linux

>>56644775
Reeeeetard.

>>56644739
>implying the privacy policy is worth shit
buddy you are gullible as fuck

>>56644888
it's still enforceable legally kiddo, grow up

>8
>not better than 7

>>56644912
oh and it´s going to be done
it´s not like people care enough for that after all they don´t have anything to hide
and it wouldn´t be the first time a big company just went on till someone sued only to get some measly fine

>>56644961
well, that's a matter of opinion but u disagree

File: 10818310_839969306053181_5088080893501400895_o.jpg (96KB, 717x960px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 717x960px

>>56642963

>>56642507
2000 top tier

>>56642778
Internet wise, yes. It has a fucking troll face in it for Christ's sake.

>>56642446
>1.0
Shit
>2.0
Less shit
>3.0
Good
>3.1
Better
>3.11
Better+
>95
Resource hog but paved the way to greater things
>98
Great support for games
>98SE
Less prone to BSOD with minor things like not being able to read a CD, bette support for MMX.
>CE
Trash
>NT 4.0
Dated but stable and made use of NTFS which was better than FAT32
>ME
98SE with instable kernel and more features that will be used later in XP
>2000
Stable, dated less support for gaming hardware such as my 2 Voodoo 2 cards (No sli support or Glide)
>XP
Taking what was good from 2000 and ME and built upon NT it was the OS that had the most support for hardware and also had direct connection between software and hardware through DirectX, DirectSound, DirectInput etc.
>Vista
Like ME was to 98SE and NT4.0 it packed more stuff at the cost of stability, new way of handling DirectSound, Inpux and DirectX meant drivers had to be re-written to work with Windows new privilege tiers introduced with UAC, later Service Packs fixes lots of it but it's still a bandaid OS in the end
>7
It's Vista healed and up and running, but now with more muscle, more features and speedier kernel, it's what Vista was meant to be so it's considered Vista 2.0

In part 2 we see the OS changing direction.

>>56645350
>8
Is what happens when an OS breaks into two and becomes OS/App. This OS took UAC* to a new level of impracticability for power users while keeping less tech savvy people safer.
It's direction in UI is questionable since it is a miss match of various elements.
>8.1
Is 8 in looks and name but just like Vista it's nothing like the vanilla 8. Less problems, more stable but it's still bound by the limits of UAC*
>10
It's 8.1 more refined, more secure. At the cost of even worse and more intruding security functions. UAC* is running on over drive and hinders power users even more.
It's a mix of OS, App and commercial tool for information collecting. Thus limits power users from disabling certain features in gpedit.

>UAC*
Disable UAC and you have a functional OS again, at the cost of not being able to use any ModernUI(Formely known as Metro) Apps.
But at least drag and drop works on all three privilege tiers.

winders 95 is the greatest operating system to ever exist
fucking kill yourself op

everything is shit, stop doing anything, stop using anything. everything is shit

>>56644151
I liked 8.1 way better than 10

>>56644408
>ME slightly better
Haha, good bait.

>>56645350
>>56645365
Interesting posts anon. You missed Server 2003 which has different codebase from XP and and NT 3.1, 3.5.

>>56645608
I skipped all server OS including 2003, R2 2008 and R2 2012 since it even more remote than the NT 4.0 systems.
I did use win2000 AD instead of Pro though so my experience with regular Win 2000 is slightly limited.

Win1 and 2 is based on what I could gather from various sites and opinions.
CE is a dumbed down OS to fit what was at the time sub-par hardware so even if the OS had features the hardware it was made to run on didn't give a good enough experience, at least not from the ones we used at work.

File: 1463405644961.png (88KB, 300x256px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 300x256px

What's so bad about Win10?

>>56645655
Everything. Maybe not Dx12, but then again I haven't played any recent games so I don't know.

>>56642446
any windows is shit.

>>56642446
You obviously didn't live back in the Win95

To say it was revolutionary is an understatement.

You could say graphically it's literally identical to Windows 10 today.

>>56645655
It's just bloated with a lot of the same shit as 8, Cortana is also fucking annoying

File: 1459612795142.jpg (186KB, 800x1371px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 800x1371px

>>56645655
Let's see.

It's literally identical to 7 with Cortana and bloat added.

It's the biggest privacy violator in history.

The positives?

Taskbar for multi monitor yer somehow they can't manage ot have the clock on more then one.

And DX12.

>>56644201
>>56645655
I swear to god this is in every Windows thread.

>>56645708
I've disabled Cortana

File: well excuuuse me princess.jpg (36KB, 339x258px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 339x258px

>>56645729
There are worse operating systems in my opinion, that's all.

>>56645807
So?

>>56645729
not an argument

sure it's a little rough around the edges, but the infrastructure they've set up with UWP and phone compatibility is cool as fuck

File: madobe_tooko.jpg (114KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 400x400px

>>56644151
with this logic win10 AU is good again. Which is true

>>56645818
I'm not arguing anything you mong, I'm just pointing out that this question is asked way too much.

Why isn't Win 2000 on the list

>>56645848
>>56642507

>>56645818
>the infrastructure they've set up with UWP and phone compatibility is cool as fuck
Too obvious

>>56645655
>forced telemetry
>inconsistent UI
>flat design
>bloat
>cortana
>ads

>>56645817
Nothing. I like using Windows 10. Of course I have some issues with it, but it's not like the alternatives would do any better.

File: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.gif (2MB, 360x270px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 360x270px

>>56645818
And you use a Windows phone?

>XP
>Good
Nice memory dump bsod faggot

>>56645891
I do yes, but the great thing is that Cortana is available on iOS and Android as well

>>56645857
It's pretty great to have reminders I set on my phone automatically appear on all my other windows devices, or how the UI is consistent across each platform, how lightweight it all is etc..

>>56643105
>2
>bad
If you think 1 was good, you need to change 2 to good. It's literally the same thing but with window overlapping!

>>56645843
>win10 is good
>ever
Obvious bait

File: 1394263014343.jpg (91KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 1024x768px

>>56642446
3 was good.
NT4 was good.
95 was ok.
98 was ok.
98SE was good.
Me was shit.
2000 was good.
XP was ok (good after service packs).
Vista was shit.
7 was good.
8 was shit.
8.1 was ok.

>Win 95
>The god-tier Windows OS
>shit

>>56645959
It's a sad world where your pic related is fake

>>56645857
>/g/ always complaining about how Windows apps shit all over the system
>integrate sandboxing technologies from enterprise Windows into UWP
>/g/ shits all over it
Also reminder that UWP doesn't limit desktop applications, it just defines a core set of functionality that all applications on all devices can assume.

>>56646029
I think what really gave it away was the 1.44 MB.

>>56646093
What's wrong with the 1.44? 2HD floppies can hold that, up to 2M when unformatted.
Fuck, later Zip Disks held 400+MB of data!

>>56642446
But 95 was good, 98 was shit, 98SE was good, XP was shit, XPSP2 was tolerable. Vista from SP1 onwards was also good.

>>56646128
Microsoft would have used DMF (1.68 MB) for anything with that many disks.

>>56646282
From the wikipedia article:
>utilities had to specially support the format in order to read the disk
The first disk/disks, then, must contain some software to read DMF, and since DMF is not supported on it's own, the first floppy/ies must be 1.44mb formatted.

>>56645924
>amusing how easy it is to trigger idiots who take a pic meant to show how retarded this is serious

>>56646375
They would still label the first disk as DMF. You can verify this on retail copies of Windows 95 or Office 95.

>>56646564
>implying you're not the idiot, since you're unable to form a correct sentence.

>>56644888
Right, because it wouldn't occur to anyone, especially secret services, to break, bend or ignore law.

Anything after XP is automatically shit, because no docs. Remember when you didn't need an Internet connection for online documentation? Remember context sensitive help? Now you try to Bing® details for options in Windows 7, and Microsoft redirects you to help for Windows 10.

File: 42352343.jpg (19KB, 277x400px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 277x400px

>>56644384
98 - shit

wut

>>56647631
98 is just 95 with Internet Explorer and Active Desktop bloat.

>>56647631
98 was shit until second edition was released.

File: Untitled.png (268KB, 703x2397px) Image search: [Google]

268KB, 703x2397px

>>56645873
>>forced telemetry
pic
>inb4 i-it still tracks every single of your moves
>j-just watch CPU usage as you move cursor around
>>inconsistent UI
I'll give you that, not like it's anything major. "Settings" app could get an overhaul tho.
>>flat design
>I don't like it therefore it's bad
>why can't we stay forever on one thing and never move on?
>I have autism
>>bloat
Can you be more specific?
My Start Menu isn't bloated in my own opinion
>>cortana
Can be disabled? What is the problem?
>>ads
I'll give you that, if the user is a retard. After a fresh install there were ads in the start menu. A few clicks and swipes and all are gone (pic). They never came back even after updates (like some people are claiming)

>>56642446
95, 98se, 2k, xp, server 03, vista, 7, server 08 r2, and server 2012 r2 are all solid.

ms server os are really stable

>>56649679

>that pic

All dat placebo, jej

>>56649679
>>>flat design
>>I don't like it therefore it's bad
>>why can't we stay forever on one thing and never move on?

you know imagine this really really crazy idea
i mean it´s so crazy not even microsoft got so far as to manage to implement it
so revolutionary it is
it´s called
allowing the user to customize that piece of shit ui

so no we don´t have to stay on one thing forever
what we have to do is allow the users to make their own shit if they want to

>>56646624
oh buhu what do i care if that sentence is formed incorrectly
you should rather learn to read and understand my first post instead of pissing about how i write my shit

>>56643105
Wait, people really didn't like 98?

95 was great get out of here.

>>56642446
>>56642446
3.1, 95, 98, ME were all complete shit compared to other contemporary operating systems such as OS/2 and NeXTSTEP

>>56650088
for fucks sake
this has to be bait i can´t imagine people being this retarded

>>56642446
>this 9fag-tier maymay again

>windows 3.1
shit
>windows 95
good
>windows 98
shit
>windows 98 SE
good
>windows Me
absolute shit
>windows 2000
good
>windows xp
shit (good after sp2)
>windows vista
shit (good after sp1)
>windows 7
good
>windows 8
good
>windows 8.1
good
>windows 10
shit

There
>muh every 2nd windows is bad meme

>>56642446
Windows 95 was okay. Windows 98 and Windows ME were terrible because they were really abusing how complex a 32-bit wrapper on a 16-bit OS could be.

This does not include Windows 2000 which was okay.

This does not include Windows 8.1 which was also okay.

Ignore the faggots who say this should include NT. NT was not for home use. Microsoft didn't deceive businesses on purpose like it did home users.

>>56650684
>This does not include Windows 8.1 which was also okay.
They added a button. A BUTTON. That doesn't warrant an OK.

>>56642898
>posting reddit shit
>going to reddit
Honestly fuck off

>>56644408
>CE/ME slightly better
>Vista good, but got a lot of heat because of UAC

>not because they were both utterly broken pieces of shit

Fuck right off, kys. This isn't even an opinion it's pretty much general knowledge that they were both absolute failures.

>>56650699
It's pretty much what people hated 8 for not having.

>>56642446
3.1 was shit, 95 was shit, 98 was shit, me was shit, 2000 was okay, xp was okay, vista was shit, windows 7 was okay, 8 was shit, 8.1 was shit, 10 is shit
i don't really see any pattern
either way you should probably look at the server and workstation versions instead since they appear to give zero shits about all their consumer operating systems, even the pro versions are gimped

>>56645126
how is 2011 ancient in any way
feels like yesterday

>>56645365
>power users
heh, nice meme

>>56645689
a disaster?

>it's the "vista was shit" meme from meme babbies who never used it again

>>56642446
>win95
>shit
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

File: 1473812824730.gif (932KB, 400x265px) Image search: [Google]

932KB, 400x265px

>>56643105
>98
>bad
DIE NIGGER REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>56652984
Windows 98 was infamous for its blue screens.

>>56642446
>10
>good
holy fuck no

>>56645126
using a troll face in 2011 is still out of date

>>56644408
You nigger NT 5.0 was Win 2000 NT 5.1 was XP

>>56642778
when did dr manhattan do graphics card shillings

>>56642446
That should say 8 is shit, show an empty space for WIndows 9 and a troll face for windows 10.

>>56642778
> Tfw 2011 is 5 years ago, soon to be 6 years ago

Feels bad, man

>>56642446
windows vista wasnt that bad afterall

File: b18.jpg (139KB, 523x889px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 523x889px

>>56642446

>>56657624
we live at a time in society where the flat, minimal type of logos is now the new professional. that's just the way its gonna be for a while until the next new thing comes along, who knows whats it gonna be.