https://www.strawpoll.me/11239012
Texting, Internet and music.
This is 99% of a normie consumer phones expected usage.
>>56636865
>No headphones
L M A O
>>56636865
Whoever saying that under no circumstance whatsoever would ever buy a pone without the jack is memeing. What if you had to choose between one of the first military cellphone models from 35 years ago or something like a samsung galaxy without a headphone jack? What would you pick? See, there's a situation where you'd buy a pone without a headphone jack, thus you should vote yes.
Only if it comes with a free iPod nano (with a jack, obvi)
>>56637156
>maximum
>damage
>control
>>56636865
Right now? No.
In 3-5 years? I can't say. It depends on how the market develops.
>>56637156
>>56637156
>military cellphone models
Give me two USB type C ports and you've got a deal.
>>56637399
This is basically what I was thinking. Heck, even one wouldn't be so bad. The fact that Apple got rid of a standard jack (3.5mm) and kept their proprietary Lightning port was a nasty combo. If they had switched to USB C at the same time, they could've accelerated the manufacturing of USB C headphones.
>>56636865
Yes, I'd buy a phone without headphone jack, if it was a dumbphone used exclusively as a, you know, phone. Then I'd buy a Sansa from the money I save up by not falling into the yearly new $400 smartphone fad.
I want to buy a phone with 2 headphone jacks.
>>56637428
Marshall London.
It sucks.
>>56636865
Yes as I've never plugged headphones into any of my phones before.
I still think it's a stupid decision to drop the jack.
if it comes with wireless earbuds, yes
not spending 150-200 on decent bt ear buds
>>56637156
Yeah except in real life my options aren't limited to a 35 yo phone and a headphonejackless one, so I'll just get a newer model with a headphone jack.
>>56637156
I would just not buy a cellphone. It's that easy, and I save money.
>>56637156
this is the worst argument I've seen in a long time. Its like saying you're a faggot cause you prefer sucking dick over dying.