Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
ugly prick
IPS vs TN, opinions 2016-09-15 14:08:32 Post No. 56613283
[Report] Image search: [Google]
IPS vs TN, opinions 2016-09-15 14:08:32 Post No. 56613283
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: MG278Q-MG279Q-Side-by-Side.jpg (496KB, 3167x1343px) Image search:
[Google]
496KB, 3167x1343px
I was like I need a new monitor. Then I looked up monitors, and then I realized that there's a fuckton of monitors. Everyone is like, "tn is better for gaming but it's not". People throw in input lag vs response time vs contrast vs colors etc.
So what's /g's opinion?
Is tn's low inputlag just marketing?
I just want a really nice 100hz+ 27'' 1440p monitor to go with some pretty serious overwatch. Looking at mg278q mg279q.
I'm an nvidiot btw, but gsync prices are horrible, I rather want to support freesync even though I have an novideo gpu.
>>
Korean 1440p ips monitor, such as a qnix evolution II, overclock it for 90+ frames.
Bye.
>>
I'd get IPS if you can afford one with a low refresh rate
>>
>>56613312
Eeer response time, you want one with a high refresh rate, or one that can be overclocked at least
>>
>>56613283
VA for contrast and no backlight bleed/glow (mostly for media consumption)
IPS for "serious" image editing
TN for gaymes
>>
>>56613307
I own one of these. OCs to 90hz pretty nice but it's also a pretty flimsy piece of shit. The panel isn't even fastened to the trim and moves around its plastic case. Not worth the money IMO unless you're crafty and can do something with it.
>>
>>56613283
You write like a teenage girl
>>
File: aac4391a872929c7c5723e5e493db.jpg (74KB, 428x652px) Image search:
[Google]
74KB, 428x652px
>>56613283
>Then I looked up monitors, and then I realized that there's a fuckton of monitors
How did you even find this website, you retard
Thread posts: 8
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2