Explain what's wrong with GNU
It runs games like shit
ottd runs better on gnu/linux than on windows/nt
>>56586209
Nothing
GNU/Linux master race
>>56586209
Does not strictly adhere to standards, thus encouraging programmers to write against GNU's flaws, rather than do things by ISO/ANSI standards. Roundabout methodology for several utilities. The group behind it prefers to break from others who do not share their very limited vision completely, rather than work with them and try to bring them to a state of ""compliance"" with their arbitrary goals and guidelines.
>>56586209
musl is less sloppy
>>56586243
>>>/v/ perfect place for you manchild.
>>56586209
Nothing wrong with GNU, it's creator on the other hand...
>>56586209
I like HURD.
Gnu usually have a bunch of ticks.
There's nothing wrong with the GPL. Sure, in an ideal world we wouldn't need it because there would be no concept of copyright, but we don't live in that world. Given the world we do live in, the GPL is a good way to use the world's flaws for good rather than evil.
My beef is with Stallman and the FSF, who have made a decades-long habit of turning the perfect into the enemy of the good with their rigid purity. One recent example is how Stallman balked at adding integration for LLVM/Clang into Emacs, apparently because he disliked a BSD-licensed competitor to GCC. See also the many flame wars fought over things that allow free software and non-free software to interoperate. These aren't threats to free software, like Stallman seems to believe, but a benefit to users that leaves them, though not totally free, better off than they were.
Also this: >>56586616
>>56589131
Don't forget that they purposefully sabotaged GCC for similar reasons. Now they can't unfuck it.
>>56586209
Nothing. What's wrong with GNU?