>Loonix users think this X server bullshit is acceptable in the Current Year of our Lord
nobody does
that's why nobody smart uses it as their main display driver anymore
idiot
>>56574667
I'm sorry... but I thought that's what we all/mostly use as GUI weather that is KDE/Gnome/LXDE they work on top of X server do they not?
>>56574762
You're right and he's a retard.
A few WMs support Wayland, though. Not sure about DEs.
>>56575062
>>>56574762
>You're right and he's a retard.
>A few WMs support Wayland, though. Not sure about DEs.
Most wms and dms and des support wayland but its buggy as fuck
>>56574167
> talks about a low level display protocol
> shows an outdated wm on top of that
Learn the difference kid.
>>56574167
Yes, all Linux users think X is acceptable. That's why they're working on developing Wayland to replace it.
>>56576775
Gnome wayland is pretty stable.
KDE wayland is nowhere near ready, but slowly getting there.
>>56574167
You compressed too little.
>>56574167