has anyone noticed ublock origin slipping? some sites showing

update your lists faggot

>>56571088
why do you even bother posting?

>>56571081
You want to enable Reek's Anti-Adblock Killer - that's both a blocklist (for your adblocker, i.e. uBlock Origin) AND a userscript which you'll need GreaseMonkey or TamperMonkey to use.

That's generally pretty damn effective.

>>56572103
>Reek's Anti-Adblock Killer
ill look into that. thank you

>>56571081
>u block origin
>dash board
>3rd party filters
>ads
>enable anti-adblock killer

Could someone post a site where they have the ad blocker detection script just to test?

>>56572275
i think forbes might have it.

>>56572275
www.mypapercraft.net/

File: 657545432.png (655KB, 740x720px) Image search: [Google]

655KB, 740x720px

>>56571081
>Not using noscript

Enjoy your computer aids.

File: Untitledsasa.png (11KB, 699x349px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 699x349px

>>56572294
>>56572307

I have literally just updated the ublock lists

>>56572275
http://www.exabytetv.info/blog/listas/

>>56572348

Updating the lists doesn't mean shit if you don't activate the adblocker blockers list.

>>56572345
>suggesting noscript over ublock origin

why are you even here? you clearly have no idea what youre talking about.

>>56572756
did you mean umatrix?

>>56572788
no, i mean ublock.

umatrix is definitely a much better choice down the continuum of security, but it blows my mind how many people think ublock origin is an ad blocker. its a fucking script blocker/security tool.

umatrix just gives way more granular control with some additional features.

>>56571081
I've noticed it, too, op. On both Firefox and Chromium. I also have Anti-Adblock Killer along with the script, all fully up to date.

>>56572307
for example, gives me the error even though I have adblocker blocker.

i use ublock+umatrix+https everywhere

anything else i should use?

>>56572823
its that the websites themselves have introduced new code to detect if 3rd party content is being blocked. as a security baseline, this is what a lot of script/ad blockers do.

websites are getting more aggressive about it and the tools arent necessarily set up in such a way that they are looking for escalating arms-race style blocking-blocking-blocking.

like others have suggested, an additional tool with ONLY that feature might be worth a look, assuming the tool were trustworthy, it having a narrow focus means it could probably keep up.

>use ABP
>haven't seen a single ad or 'turn of ur adblock' in 9001 years
come at me

>>56572885
thats cause they dont bother showing the ads, abp just sends your cookies to their preferred partners direct.

>>56572855
in the forseeable future ublock+greasemonkey userscripts should be enough.

>>56571081
I haven't seen any of that. Guess you're just retarded, anon.

>>56572885
uBlock user here, haven'T seen any either, but that's because i haven'T visited a big news site for a while. Not many sites employ them, just some popular ones.

File: ads.png (1MB, 2145x1846px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2145x1846px

>>56572855
The way anti-adblock works is very easy. The site is unusable by default (pls disable adblocker). Then a script that is disguised as ad (e.g. advertising.js) gets loaded to unblock the site. A lot of adblockers will block that script that removes the adblock notice. That is why I have only enabled filters that block servers (ad, tracking, malware, ...), none that go by keywords.

>>56573001
I think the problem I had was my lists, because your selections work just fine with AAB on known websites that complain about adblockers.

>>56572348
Disable scripts. Its just a blog not sure why you need to have them enablaled. uBlock should allow you to disable scripts local and global.

>>56573161
A downside [to my list selection] is that you will see self-hosted ads on smaller sites. But I'll either block them easily with the element picker, or just let them be if they don't bother me.
And honestly, that rarely happens since most sites use 3rd party ads.

>>56572307
>www.mypapercraft.net/
It's johnmorris.me

>>56572348
>pirate bay....

get the nsa out of here faggot

>>56573281
http://adblockingdetector.johnmorris.me/

File: 1466504107569.png (329KB, 1675x404px) Image search: [Google]

329KB, 1675x404px

>>56572307
i just do this

>>56571081
>I see you're using AdBlock!
>Hey so do we!
>>le hehehe we're so cool and hip and we totally get you XD
>(((but)))
>i want to tell you what you should see in your browser running off your OS which is running on your computer which you bought with your own money, and use your bandwidth that you also spent money on to show shit that you don't want to fucking see so that we can get a couple of cents or so off you

Lynch all fucking adblock-blockers and adblock naggers.

>>56574005
You first ;^)

>>56572855
>detect if 3rd party content is being blocked
What if adblockers implement a fake http server or just generate a fake response to those requests? It could solve the issue of scripts that try to connect to random ad hosts to see if you're blocking them.

File: tmp_1.png (5KB, 559x140px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 559x140px

>>56573001
Looks like you're missing some underscores, no?

>>56574279
I take that back. It looks like gorhill is missing some underscores.

>>56573898
blocking first party scripts is enough

>>56572507
How do you activate it?

http://www.allmusic.com/

can anyone get this piece of shit to work?

File: questionmark.png (917KB, 1889x811px) Image search: [Google]

917KB, 1889x811px

>>56574545
What?

>>56574545
It works fine for me, but i have cookies globally disabled. maybe it has something to do with this

>>56573233
>[to my list selection]
that's a general issue with how adblocking currently works.

>>56574299
>>56574279
it's an example that's commented out so it doesn't matter.

>>56574545
disable 3rdparty scripts in ublock

>>56572844
canvasblocker
decentraleyes
no resource uri leak
privacy badger
random agent spoofer
self destructing cookies

>>56572818
>but it blows my mind how many people think ublock origin is an ad blocker. its a fucking script blocker/security tool.

It blows your mind that a browser extension which was constantly shilled on /g/ as an alternative to ABP is confused for an Ad blocker?

File: ublock-adblock buster buster.jpg (304KB, 2022x1032px) Image search: [Google]

304KB, 2022x1032px

>>56572348

git gud faget

>>56572855
>an additional tool with ONLY that feature might be worth a look

You do realise that scripts exist to do just that and can be incorprated into ublock