how i feel when people say Intel make the best cpu

>>56558196
A thread died so you could post this shit. Keep that in mind.

>>56558196
Intel do make the best cpu's #FACT

Don't you have a company to run into the ground, Logan?

File: cringe.jpg (3KB, 160x160px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 160x160px

>>56558330
>anything CISC
>even a contender for best CPU

>>56558196
Currently intel has better cpus when it gets to single threads(and some on multi threads) when comparing them with fx 9590 , but hopefully, zen is going to fix all that, and get to even grounds.

Let amd rule again..!

The current highest Passmark score belongs to the Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3. It's an enterprise-class server-oriented 145-Watt monster that costs nearly $3k, but it's Intel.

Though Passmark's CPU database may not be current.

>>56558196
They do, though. It's expensive, but they make the CPUs that have the best performance on the market. AMD should cut their losses at the high end and target lower end and midranged hardware. Same goes for GPUs

>>56560322
>people still think RISC is good because it had ebin SPECfp benchmarks in 1992
give me a break
even in the "golden age" before vendors ended up having to bloat the fuck out of their chips just to stay competitive that shit still had trash integer performance meaning it was trash for 85% of the average /g/ poster's daily workload

>>56560322
>Modern CISC processors are RISC at a fundamental level.
>Definitely best CPUs

You need to go outside or read wikipedia when you shit Anon.

>>56558223
You didn't post in that thread to save it .

And now you care it died .

You opportunistic fuck