[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Where do you have your taskbar?

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 95
Thread images: 21

File: tasbar-poll.png (11KB, 685x409px) Image search: [Google]
tasbar-poll.png
11KB, 685x409px
http://www.strawpoll.me/11201524
>>
>>56546955

> 2016
> Not using a FOSS terminal
>>
>>56546955
I don't have a task bar, but I have a status bar at the top. Does that still count?
>>
>>56546977
Sure, what ever works for you.
>>
File: 27-votes.png (25KB, 988x606px) Image search: [Google]
27-votes.png
25KB, 988x606px
Results so far.
>>
>not using a vertical taskbar
Enjoy those 600p vertical space on your 1366x768 craptop
>>
What about GNOME and Dash to Dock
You have one at the top and one on the left
>>
File: consider the following.jpg (29KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]
consider the following.jpg
29KB, 200x200px
on windows:

bottom
>i don't know how to computer and i would rather waste screen realestate than move the taskbar

top
>same as bottom, but i also wish i had a mac

right
>i like accidentally hitting the close button of my windows

left
>doing it right
>>
File: .png (83KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
.png
83KB, 1920x1080px
>>56546955
Blatantly correct choice.
>>
middle
>>
>>56547611
>not diagonally
>>
>>56547436
>168px taskbar
whut
>>
>>56547657
>ijmplinging that your taskbars, titlebars and other shit don't eat up the remaining space
>>
>>56547436
>600p
>768-600=168
That's a huge panel, fag. It's like you compensate something with such huge size
>>
>>56547559
"stop liking what I dont like" - the post.
>>
>>56547666
>using toolbars
>>
why is hidden not an option?
>>
>>56547718
The last option.
>>
>>56547726
hidden doesn't mean i don't use it you dip
>>
>>56547745
Where is it hidden from?
>>
>>56547718
Because it's still on one of those sides.
>>
>>56547627
Kek
>>
>>56547605
Oy vey!
>>
Bottom is quite clearly superior. On a wide-screen monitor it leaves you with a massive amount of space to freely show full window titles. The icons are also easy to open thanks to their big size. Moving the cursor to the bottom is also rather easy. Top could be decent, but it really conflicts with window frames (can't close full-screen windows by moving to screen top edge, can't work with browser tabs as easily)

Both left and right are pretty dumb since they don't even allow you to view window titles without making the bar huge. Also the argument about vertical space is dumb, a bottom bar takes a negligible amount of vertical space. And in fact vertical space is more abundant than horizontal space if you have two windows side-by-side.
>>
>[current year]
>using a taskbar
>>
>>56547826
>And in fact vertical space is more abundant than horizontal space if you have two windows side-by-side.
Cherry picking much?
>>
>>56547876
At least personally I almost never have just one window taking up the horizontal space. There's always browser window occupying the left half if nothing else.
>>
I've had it left till i moved up and bought 2 monitors.
>>
>>56547903
Then your an edge case.
That isn't a problem, but it's not the norm.
>>
>>56547559
>left
I'll have to try this after work.
>>
>>56546955
are there seriously more people here who use taskbar on top than taskbar on the left?
>>
File: Untitled.png (995KB, 4480x1440px) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.png
995KB, 4480x1440px
>>56546955
top of my 2nd monitor.
>>
File: panel.png (69KB, 1919x95px) Image search: [Google]
panel.png
69KB, 1919x95px
autohidden at the top of my secondary screen. i removed any window switching functionality because there are better methods
>>
>>56548346
Really now? What's a better method than directly clicking to the window you wanna go to?
>>
File: o.webm (2MB, 1920x540px) Image search: [Google]
o.webm
2MB, 1920x540px
>>56548431
>>
i move it frequently.
>>
i3 doesn't need a taskbar, but i have a statusbar at the top. it's at the top because hierarchy.
>inb4 left and right
hurr vertical text durr
>>
>>56547826
>window titles
The windows have icons for a reason, anon
Also on something like Gnome 2 or XFCE you can the names listed vertically
>>
>>56548650
Problem with that is that it gets messy when there's more windows, and it will be hard to locate the one you're looking for since they're not always visible.

But yeah it's fine
>>
>using a taskbar
>not using i3 with glorious dmenu masterrace
Enjoy your absolute zero productivity, winbabbies.
>>
File: server-core-setup-sconfig.png (17KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]
server-core-setup-sconfig.png
17KB, 1024x768px
>>56546955
>>56546968
>>56546977

>2016
>having a task bar
>not using Windows Server Core as your desktop OS
>>
>>56548650
>two actions is better than one action
>there is nothing in my tray
>>
>>56548901
yes, in most cases those two actions are faster

applications that create tray icons are cancer
>>
>>56549046
>tfw your OS is cancer
>>
>>56549091
well yes, it is gpl licensed
>>
File: Taskbar.png (61KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Taskbar.png
61KB, 1920x1080px
>>56547605
Just a PSA:

It's possible to make the taskbar thinner using '7+ Taskbar Tweaker'. Just 1 icon instead of 2. Pic related, my setup
>>
>>56551302
Protip: compare the widths of mine and yours.
>>
>>56546955
>not having a bottom taskbar on autohide
>>
>>56551302
How?
>>
>>56551455
>having a taskbar
>>
>>56547559
>bottom
>>i don't know how to computer and i would rather waste screen realestate than move the taskbar
>implying I want taskbars on the left or right in a multi-monitor setup with screens side by side
>implying I want taskbars on the left or right on a portrait monitor.
That would be pretty retarded
>>
File: .png (206KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
.png
206KB, 1920x1080px
>>56551464
Right click on taskbar icon, advanced settings, set no width limit to 1. It can be resized now, and you can hide the 7+ icon after that.
>>
File: ss+(2016-09-11+at+01.54.23).jpg (888KB, 3170x1014px) Image search: [Google]
ss+(2016-09-11+at+01.54.23).jpg
888KB, 3170x1014px
Top just because it's default in bbZero. Left and right are pure cancer, bottom is alright.

Monitor on the right is a TV I use to get comf when watching movies.
>>
File: 1397866124871.png (232KB, 338x370px) Image search: [Google]
1397866124871.png
232KB, 338x370px
>>56551540
>horssefucker
>>
left on my right screen
>>
>>56551540
thank you!!!

rarity > luna
>>
left in wangblows
top or without in loonix
>>
Does my wm bar count, if so top.
>>
>>56551540
>Windows 10
>Pony faggot

Not surprised tbqh.
>>
Bottom, auto-hidden.
>tfw I'm also an anti-minimalist oversized dock-using monster
>>
>>56551479
>not having a taskbar
>>
>>56551785
>wasting screen space on such a useless thing
>>
>>56551429
What do you mean? Mine's of about ~30px.
>>
File: joker.jpg (130KB, 757x505px) Image search: [Google]
joker.jpg
130KB, 757x505px
>>56551780
>buying a mac

JUST LOCK ME UP
>>
>>56551822
I meant that you should look at the width of mine. And compare it to yours.
>>
>>56546955
task bar on top master race
>>
>>56551861
>implying there's anything wrong with that
This is an 18+ website.
>>
File: 1457483553449.png (302KB, 400x403px) Image search: [Google]
1457483553449.png
302KB, 400x403px
Default is always best
>>
>>56551861
>>
>>56551706
>Not upgrading for free
Even more of an idiot than I thought.

kys loser.
>>
>>56552124
>taking a free downgrade when you can just not downgrade
>>>/v/
>>
>>56547559
>bottom
>i don't know how to computer and i would rather waste screen realestate than move the taskbar
You have a small monitor, son.

>left
>doing it right
That's where the icons go. Can't click the icons if the taskbar keeps popping up.
>>
>>56551815
>not having it set to autohide
>>
>>56552157
>Windows 10
>Downgrade

Kek. Enjoy your shitty Metro, Balmer.
>>
>>56546955
"auto-hide"

Is very buggy but the best option to be honest.
>>
>>56552247
>having it at all

>>56552255
>Windows 10
>upgrade
Metro is 1000x better than the clusterfuck that is Windows 10.
>>
>>56552255
>>56552277
I just use the classic shell to have my regular windows 7 style start menu and do not worry about learning the newest configurations.
>>
>>56546955
>not having your taskbar 3 units wide on the bottom of your portrait monitor
>>
File: .png (276KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
.png
276KB, 1920x1080px
>>56552376
I actually like the aesthetics, and apps view is easier to navigate than classic style tree view, you can even sort it in different ways. But I understand why many people don't like it. Overall, 8.1 is more consistent because the desktop part is largely unchanged.
>>
>>56552503
RARARARA > WOONA
>>
File: .jpg (15KB, 500x90px) Image search: [Google]
.jpg
15KB, 500x90px
>>56552529
>>
>>56552503
AYYYYYYY /MLPG/
>>56552529
You're wrong.
>>
Sad to see most of you faggots still ise taskbars instead of glorious tilling wms and keybindings
>>
>>56547559
left
>looks ugly as shit but at least I saved 10 vertical pixels so i can have an extra line of text on my screen
>>
File: .png (25KB, 366x447px) Image search: [Google]
.png
25KB, 366x447px
>>56552568
>MLPG
>>
>>56552568
I'm right.
>>
>>56551302
thank fuck
>>
File: uwot.jpg (37KB, 528x528px) Image search: [Google]
uwot.jpg
37KB, 528x528px
>>56552580
>>
So many fucking greenposts it's making me sick
>>
>>56546955
If you have a taskbar and aren't making it autohide on the left then you haven't truly lived yet
>>
>>56546955
Both, MATE master race.
>>
>>56553399
>not having 4 taskbars on every side of his screen
Fucking plebeians.
>>
>>56548700
>The windows have icons for a reason, anon
What about when you have multiple windows of the same application you fucking pineapple
>>
>>56546968
>pacman broke x again
>>
File: ICONS.png (6KB, 108x180px) Image search: [Google]
ICONS.png
6KB, 108x180px
>>56553758
Then they are grouped together like this
Thread posts: 95
Thread images: 21


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.