IT STARTS WITH
ONE THING
one port
>>56514609
>>56514614
I DON'T KNOW WHY
IT DOESN'T EVEN MATTER HOW USELESS YOU ARE
mOMS SPAGHE T T I
KEEP THAT IN MICE
>>56514624
DOESN'T EVEN MATTER HOW HARD I TRY.
Courage.
>>56514595
Is the water resistance rating higher than that of s7 atleast?
>>56514668
Keep that in mind, I designed this phone without the "head"
>>56514706
no. ip68 vs ip 67.
same with s6.
>implying people with iPhones listen to music with them
no. apple has looked at all the data and less than 1% of users even use the headphone jack
unlike NEETS, applefags are normies and actually talk and interact with people rather than retreating into their devices because the outside world is too big and scary for them
>>56514797
Let me guess, you have an ipod for your music? Such a good goy. I have to give apple credit for the level of brainwashing they do to the consumers.
>>56514829
you mad that the iPod you through in the trash is now worth $500 plus
stay salty harry
>>56514797
>apple has looked at all the data and less than 1% of users even use the headphone jack
[citation needed]
>>56514856
Man you're a cuck. Apple ass fucks you with the cost of their iPhone and then you proceed to buy another device which offers no additional functionality. Why are people like you allowed to reproduce?
>>56514963
OH NO! YOUR PHONES COSTS $300 MORE THAN MINE
IM SO POOR
LOL STAY SALTY HARRY
>>56514987
>Crap, they're right!
>Better shitpost!
Daily reminder that this is why phones are this thick.
Apple is a lifestyle product.
I PUSH MY FINGERS INTO MYYYYYYY
>>56515116
apple nano ports when
>>56514595
>>56515253
>tfw dlc hardware
>>56515253
why does that adapter not have a headphone jack port? what's the point?
>>56515273
*rubs hands*
>>56515280
innovashun
>>56515151
ASSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
Technology is far enough.
A phone does not need any connector apart from a few pads on the pcb for programming/diagnostic.
Anyone who genuinely doesn't believe that is truly tech illiterate.
Apple is shit tho, don't be mislead!
>>56515523
What are you even
>>56514956
>[citation needed]
Stallman, on mobile phone surveillance
>>56515523
Yes, it is possible to produce a phone with wireless charging that has no ports but it wouldn't be practical, would it?
>>56515645
moto z play shilling
>>56514797
what else would they use? do you still live in 2005 too and think people still use discrete MP3 players in 20 fucking 16???
Calling it now, next year/year after will have no ports at all and will be charged by placing some kind of magnet charger on top of the home button.
>>56514797
So why did they include the adapter? 99% don't need it.
>>56515708
but it would be innovative
>>56515768
because apple cares about each and every one of their customers
even the autist minority
>headphones
When will apple invent a way to beam music directly into my head
>>56515838
a couple years after someone actually invents it
Literally not an issue. Every iphone user already carries around a purse for their chargers/powerbanks anyway.
And /g/ do not act like you faggots don't carry backpacks literally everywhere.
>>56515927
you got me
>>56515927
there is carrying stuff and there is constantly holding things in your hand retard