I2P vs Tor vs Freenet

Tor. Fuck using a shitty clone that requires poo in loo Java.

>>56501543
Could be implemented in anything.
Tor is compromised and soon even lowly law enforcement and chink hackers will track down your CP downloads.

>>56502225
You asshats keep saying this with no proof. Idiots enabling js is not proof that it is compromised.

>>56502225
The same could be said for Tor. You don't have to connect using Tor Browser. You could make your own web browser.

What's wrong with I2P then?

>>56502952
>>56502952
nothing
just a little slow at first

Is there anything of interest except from cp on I2P? Should I bother searching more about it?

>>56503025
A lot of the stuff is private forums and shit like on TOR. Sometimes people put there websites on there so they AREN'T discovered

i2p is cool but it doesn't have as big as a "public" deepweb to browse, so unless you actually have links to places chances are you're going to get bored of i2p faster than you would of Tor.

>>56503093
Well I don't really have any interest in deep websites, I just want to anonymize myself

>>56499179
Tor: everything is here
I2P: literally nothing except a forum about how great i2P is
Freenet: Illegal files on your computer and similar to I2P

>>56503486
i2p doesn't let you get to the normal clear web, but it's theoretically optimized for things like torrenting which tor isn't good for.

>>56503520
>Tor: everything is here
>I2P: literally nothing except a forum about how great i2P is
Also this

OK, noob question. Is there a way to route everything I do through tor an I2P? Not just the browser.