How much money have you cost advertising companies?

>>56498796
>using AdBlock

Please go.

>>56498796
i should be the one making money not them!

File: 1461701882600.png (2MB, 2915x2084px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2915x2084px

>>56498796
>using AdBlock/ABP in 2016

>>56498860
>>56498829

What else is there

>>56498796
Bazillions monies

>>56498796
If they want me to read their shit they better pay me

>>56498875
ublock origin

>>56498875
ABP is fine, /g/ is filled with snowflakes.

File: euphoric.gif (1MB, 326x256px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 326x256px

>>56498829
>le superior advertising block software meme

>>56498882
>Recommending uHide
I'd rather block the ads and not just hide them.

>>56498888
>ABP
>Taking money for whitelisting "acceptable ads"
They are even more shady than the advertising business

File: ab2.png (2KB, 120x36px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 120x36px

>>56498796

>>56498796
$2

File: Untitled.png (4KB, 188x325px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 188x325px

>>56498796

File: 2016-09-08-21-54-46.png (16KB, 176x358px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 176x358px

>>56499003
> 19 %

What kind of shit sites are you browsing?

>>56499003
>>56499185
also, your font rendering is hilariously bad. Compare your screenshot to mine.

is ublock + tampermonkey + anti-adblock killer still the most effective filtering?

>>56500680
why would you use tampermonkey?

ublock has anti^2-adblock integrated

>>56498888
>>56498891
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Does-uBlock-block-ads-or-just-hide-them%3F

>>56498796
What's with these constant anti-adblock threads? Someone's getting paid for them, right?

>>56498796
Hopefully a lot

>>56498888
AdBlock isn't Adblock Plus faggot pussy

>>56499003
>>56499185
What does the % means in ublock ? I've never understood this shit

>1,319,627 or 13%

>>56501355
Have you tried not being retarded?

>adblock
use noscript you idiot

>>56501418
Yes, does it mean 13% of all ads ? I doubt that

>>56501438
13% of all connections were blocked.

>>56501437
Hey, here's an even better idea for you, dipshit. Don't block ads at all and stop stealing money from others

>>56501475
13% off all existing "connections" on my filters ? I really don't get it

File: Capture.png (2KB, 122x49px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 122x49px

a few

>>56498796
Most sites don't get any money for just displaying the ad.

They get money only if the visitor clicks on the ad.

I don't cost advertisers money by blocking ads.
In fact I save them money. I'm not clicking their ads but at the same time they aren't wasting bandwidth that would otherwise be used to display an ad that won't be clicked.

Ad blocking is win/win.

>>56501546
13% (by count, not size) of all things your browser has downloaded have been blocked

>>56501617
>he thinks ads need to be clicked
You're not very bright.

>>56501635
>not size
It better not be able to calculate that. It would mean it downloads the ads.

Adblockers use too much RAM, so I just browse with Javascript disabled these days, except for sites like 4chan where there's minimal advertising anyway

>>56498796
>advertising companies
we save then millions of dollars, they doesn't have to pay for advertising products that we don't buy

Not a penny because I wasn't going to click them anyways.

>>56501516
Ok, if you stop shoving shitty ads in my face.

>>56498796
hopefully millions

>>56501888
Fall in line or perish.

i'm really spoiled. i get mad now when i have to deal with commercials and ads. really mad.

i dont want to see that shit.

Speaking off, anyone started getting youtube ads randomly lately?

Only happens when I watch RedLetterMedia and only in the middle of the episode.

Happens very rarely though.

>>56501676
not necessarily, you can frequently get the size of something before downloading it.

>>56500827
certainly

File: Screen Shot 2016-09-08 at 6.22.25 PM.png (57KB, 506x424px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 506x424px

>>56498796
not bad

>>56501516
fuck off mate it's my pc and i'm not buying your shit anyways

Adtech employee here.

Youre costing the publishers money, the advertisers never play so their unaffected.

Also 1000 ads (video) sells for ~8 bucks.
Assume 4-2 bucks for 1000 banner and other shitty ads in your cost calculations.

HAVE FUN!

File: xwi4Oac[1].png (10KB, 161x357px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 161x357px

>>56499185
What kind of shit sites are YOU browsing?

>>56502290
Thanks and you're welcome.

0 money.

I wouldn't buy into any shit anyway and adblocks keep my brain cleaner.

>>56502290
Thats assuming I would click every single one though, right?

>>56501834
>he thinks ads need to be clicked
You're not very bright.

File: contender.png (7KB, 163x368px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 163x368px

>>56499003

>>56498891
(You)

>>56501153
It is:
> Migrated AdBlock to use Adblock Plus (ABP)'s open-source core
https://github.com/kzar/watchadblock/releases/tag/3.0

>>56502053
Not frequently, always.. fuck you clearly don't understand how computers interpret data.

>>56498796

Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't ad revenue come in on the basis of per ad served? By that logic, you cost them the most money when you actually let the ad load and then don't buy the product.

>>56501692
This is actually true, the ones who lose money is the website, the advertising company doesn't lose a penny advertising to someone who wouldn't buy the product anyway.

File: Untitled.png (17KB, 213x363px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 213x363px

Feels good never thinking about this shit.

>>56498796
bout tree fiddy

File: 1457950717741.png (3KB, 154x57px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 154x57px

wew

>>56506802
What the actual fuck?

File: Screen Shot 2016-09-08 at 11.35.09 PM.png (24KB, 163x361px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 163x361px

uMatrix catches most shit nowadays

>>56498796
I really don't care about increasing my penis size though. I think I'll keep my adblocker on until they make less intrusive ads. I'm perfectly fine with ads that are related to my interests, I even click them when I enable ads for a trusted site.

For example edaboard has electronic ads and they're really interesting to me, but I don't want to see forced ads everywhere. Wasn't this the whole point of Google's spying, how are they still terrible at showing me electronics ads while keeping others away?

File: BHgdl8I.png (140KB, 560x560px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 560x560px

>>56498796
>How much money have you cost youtubers?

File: Trampled Underfoot.png (7KB, 160x372px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 160x372px

>>56498796

>>56507567
If there's anyone that deserves money, it's the youtubers. Billion dollar productions attract crowds of millions while 10$ production attracts hundreds of millions. If the people watch it are entertained they're the same. We don't deserve anything.

>>56498882
Don't fucking tell them

File: 2016-09-09_00-13-26.png (14KB, 212x482px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 212x482px

>>56498796

File: Capture.png (15KB, 202x373px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 202x373px

>>56498796
So you're telling me... that I have the highest counter in this thread?

>>56507604
You actually don't cost youtubers anything when you're using adblock. Not a every viewer gets an ad, so let's say 1 in 10 people who watch a certain video get an ad, and the 10th person has adblock, the ad just goes to the next guy who watches it. It's only ever going to be a problem if a very large percentage of people start using it, at which point google will probably start restricting its use.

Source: Heard a youtuber talking about it on a stream

>>56507925
>Not a every viewer gets an ad
I find this difficult to believe.

>>56498796
Why wouldn't you just use ublock origin?

>since install
>877,740 or 14%
And this does not count all the shit I have blocked with uMatrix which is much more.

>>56498888
Except that it's inferior.

>>56498891
Please just stop posting.

>>56501437
1: doesn't block ads that are not causes by js
2: inferior to uMatrix and/or uBlock Origin still

>>56502075
>ABP

All the browser plugins lag your browser out to shit still parsing all those trackers/AIDS.

You can simply use the ublock origin/adblock plus lists they come with on hosts or firewall to kill it completely before it ever reaches your browser thus saving memory. You won't get that "we detected Adblock" bullshit popup either that some sites are now deploying to beg you for money.

File: ss+(2016-09-09+at+01.34.22).png (8KB, 157x363px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 157x363px

>>56498796
Not enough.

>>56498796
Probably next to none if any thing at all, because most advertising doesn't apply to me. (Technology advertising would, but only to a very minimal degree)

>>56498796
If uBlock Origin hides ads instead of blocks them, why do some shitty sites still prevent you from accessing content when it's enabled?

>>56508570
>You can simply use the ublock origin/adblock plus lists they come with on hosts or firewall
Wrong, only a very small amount of filters can be used and none of the cosmetic filters.

>to kill it completely before it ever reaches your browser
The extensions already do that
Moreover, unlike the host files and firewalls the extensions block the request from being executed.

>You won't get that "we detected Adblock" bullshit popup
You don't get it already because you are using the anti-anti-adblock filters. Moreover there is no reason why hosts files would not show the warning while adblockers would.

>>56508654
>If uBlock Origin hides ads instead of blocks them
It doesn't

>>56498860
Question;
If I use Ublock would I be able to stop ads from taking up muh data and would websites still be able to see/notice I blocked their ads? It's fucking annoying when websites I don't give a shit about are like "YOU MUST SEE MUH ADS" like, fuck off. I'll whitelist you if I give a shit.

>>56508770
>would I be able to stop ads from taking up muh data
What do you mean by that?

>and would websites still be able to see/notice I blocked their ads?
Not if you use the right filters.

>>56508824
>Not if you use the right filters.

Teach me sempai

File: 1454011627173.png (142KB, 704x736px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 704x736px

>>56508841

>>56508654
>>56508760
It does both, depending on the type of ad.

Not all ads are blockable. For example, text ads can't be blocked because they're part of the page content itself - rather than an external request to a script or image.

μBlock0 (and ABE etc.) do ad hiding for non-blockable ads like these, and ad blocking for actual page requests (e.g. scripts, iframes or images)

>>56509189
>For example, text ads can't be blocked because they're part of the page content itself - rather than an external request to a script or image.
These are called cosmetic filters.

>>56506527
No you can't you retard. The only way you know the size of a download is by reading the content-length header, if they choose to send it.

>>56507925
>google will start restricting its use
wtf can they do this? Do we need a google blocker now?

>>56508885
Just tested it out, thanks anon.

I like it when /g/ is cool guy.

>>56502053
That would still require a HEAD, a good way to let yourself be tracked.

>>56498796
Nothing.
I do not click on ads anyways, so would i like to see them?

>>56504712
It's like saying uBlock is the same as uBlock Orgin...

>>56509194
Yes, and cosmetic filters are ad hiding rules. Your point?

>>56510052
My point is that you are a faggot and should end yourself.

>>56508061
Okay. We don't care what you believe.

File: ayyyyy.jpg (22KB, 168x365px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 168x365px

>>56507772
fuck, you beat me, i thought i had the highest one

>>56498882
>>56499003
>>56499185
>>56501569
>>56502345
>>56502671
>>56506737
>>56506802
>>56507344
>>56507591
>>56507705
>>56507772
>>56508617
>>56508654
>still blocking ads on a addon level
stop being fags and gitgud

>>56510992
What do you use? Privoxy?

>>56498796
None, since I don't make requests of their servers.

where can i see it?
I have "count filter hits" checked but no idea where to see the number
also for some reason "show in tasbar" isnt checkable, and resets to blank every now and then

>>56498796
>How much money have you cost advertising companies?

Logically, a fraction of the money I've saved by not buying their products

What does the percentage mean in uBlock Origin

File: 900 DOLLERINOS.png (7KB, 157x328px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 157x328px

>>56499003
APROXIMATELY 900 $

>>56511490
> 2,463,688 or 15%
And that's not my only PC.

The internet is bankrupt.

>>56511354
How much shitty botnet all your visited sites contain.

>>56498891
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Does-uBlock-block-ads-or-just-hide-them%3F

The origin ublock did hide ads, but uBlock Origin blocks at a network level.

>there are people on /g/ who dont block ads at a dns or hosts file level

>>56511835
>The origin ublock did hide ads
Source?

>>56511896
>there are people on /g/ who think you can block all ads at a DNS or hosts file level
Good job blocking maybe 5% of the ads out there. Am impressed

Soon ad blocking will be illegal just like piracy and torrents. It's inevitable.

File: seven figures.jpg (75KB, 716x646px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 716x646px

>>56498796
"Seven figures."

>>56509906
You're like saying uBlock with its 1.3 yr old code base is the same as current uBlock Origin.

>>56511931
Yes, and then I'll have to stop blocking ads, just like I stopped torrenting..

... wait

>>56498888
>Shitty shill software that accepts bribes from ad companies to whitelist their ads
>Very heavy on the resources compared to μBlock0
yeah no thanks