Apples INSANE brand loyalty

>>56495088

Long term buyers justification. Also reviewers just make up bullshit.

>>56495088
This is a thread about something that is never happened. What is wrong with you?

>>56495088
Reviewers>journalism>arts>gay>apple fanboy.

>>56495156

Top parts never happened but we all know it would if they had a 750p screen. Reviewers sometime criticise sony for having a 1080p screen.

>>56495088
The z compacts by Sony have a 720p screen and nobody cares except stat whore reviewers.

>>56495193
Are the criticisms of the Sony screen valid?

>>56495227
it doesn't have a meaningless buzzword attached to it so its bad

>>56495227
Why did Sony fuck up that series

I really want a good sub-5" lagdroid

>>56495088
You're literally bitching on the internet about a situation that didn't happen about a cell phone...

Reevaluate your life for fuck sake

>>56495227
>720p screen

don't you mean the ALL-DAY BATTERY SCREEN?

>>56495231

Honestly don't know since I've never used anything higher than 1080p.

I'm guessing there is a noticeable difference though from using my own 1080p phone which could clearly be improved(but not by much), don't know if it's worth the sacrifices though.

>>56495289
I'm getting 2 full days of battery life on my 2.5 year old z1c after I removed the shitty facebook app.

>>56495262

We all know it would happen though.

>>56495088
Marketing. Apple buyers are generally very insecure people (teenage girls, closet homosexuals) who feel a desperate need to belong somewhere. Apple's marketing team plays right into this need, giving them a feeling of belonging. This of course explains why apple (but also other brands) fanboys get so hostile and defensive when criticizing their choice of products. For them it's not just a product, it's quite literally an extention of their personality.

>>56495259
They just announced a new one last week

>>56495088
Have you actually look at an iphone recently? they have great screens, the best ones after samsungs.

It's like you all forgot that 1080p and up phones are a meme.

Congratulations you were brainwashed by the industry.

>>56495088
How do they do it?

If a journalist ever bitches about apple products, the media won't ever be invited to any apple product release.

It's simple bitchslap tactics from apple to prevent honest journalism.

I'm using a Galaxy S3, which is 720p with Pentile so effectively only 480p. It looks ugly but it's a phone so I don't care. I have no plans on upgrading.

File: 12063036_737123213060603_492738463_n.jpg (82KB, 480x587px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 480x587px

When can I buy a apple branded surge protector because my wall outlet doesn't have enough outlets to charge all my apple branded accessories.

>>56495227
I still remember and cringe at Wired's review of the Z3 Compact (720p screen, 319ppi):
http://www.wired.co.uk/article/sony-xperia-z3-compact

>CONS: screen is not quite as pin-sharp as we'd like
Suck more Cook cock, iWired bitches.

>>56497434
>defends apple
>calls someone else brainwashed

kek

>>56495088

modern cults
i think its >>> /x/

That resolution is perfectly acceptable on 4,7'' screen.
I mean, i'm still satisfied with my 1280x768 Nexus 4. I don't see why you'd need a higher resolution screen on a phone. What's the point?

File: 1462466939508.png (1MB, 600x577px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 600x577px

>>56495088
what is this and why does it look like a surveillance camera?

>>56495088
Because Android is suppose to be better than Apple. As soon as we stoop down to their level of shit hardware and consumer blindness, that's when Android looses.

nobody gives a shit about resolution.
sony has a 4k res phone, nobody even knows its nickname.

somebody is going to swallow one of these.

File: 42IE1PA.gif (2MB, 177x150px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 177x150px

>>56498441

>>56495088

Because capitalism rewards excellence, OP.

Don't worry, von Mises promised so. He wouldn't lie to you, would he?

The free market will fix it. Have faith in it!

File: 1466584283235.png (66KB, 510x332px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 510x332px

>>56495088
>Samsung/LG/Sony release a high end phone with a 750p screen


Implying anything cares what those companies actually release!

>>56498389
No way is that acceptable. 1080p should be the minimum at this point. Are you telling me you hate having more pixels?

>>56498622
i'm saying that at 4,7" you don't need any more
318 ppi on a phone is clear and efficient, and that's still less than iphone 7, at 326 and 7+, at 401

>>56498622
>Are you telling me you hate having more pixels?
Having more pixels for the sake of having more pixels is useless.
It requires more processing power, meaning more lag or lower quality. It also requires more power in general which means less battery life. Oh, and it's also more expensive.

>>56498702
The A10 Fusion is probably the strongest and most efficient processor for phones. The Samsung Galaxy S7 uses qualcomm with a quad HD screen. And when compared to iphone 6S it does way better in battery life.i'm not saying to have the most pixels ever but at least up to 1080p because thats the standard resolution for everything; youtube videos; netflixs; pictures

>>56498795
>does way better in battery life
could it be because the battery is almost twice as big?

>>56495088
>It would get completely BTFO beyond recovery
No, I'd prefer it.

>comparing phones with 5.7 inch screen with a phone with a 4.7 inch screen

Its 326ppi, unless you are doing VR you dont really need more.

The iPhone + is 1080p which is more than enough for a phone

Every single reviewer agrees that iPhones have one of the best looking screens and they improved it again this year with wide color.

Lets see the reviews before anything

>>56499028
okay lets compare a 4.7 inch 750p iphone vs a 4.7inch 1080p iphone what will look better? OBVIOUSLY THE 1080P, 750p is 'good enough" BUT IT COULD BE BETTER. And apple is not giving us better

>>56495088
Not only that, they outright said it was the best screen in any smartphone right now.

Disregarding the stone age resolution, it's not even oled.

File: 1468550366448.jpg (57KB, 677x126px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 677x126px

>>56495088
All Apple reviews are fake.

>>56495088
The issue with Sony's last Xperia line was that it was too costly for the specs and any phone at the same price could do better. Welp, now the iPhone 7 costs more with less pixel density, but at least you have your 4k recording

>>56499302
tinfoils arrived

abandon thread

File: 1445468878099.jpg (171KB, 864x1020px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 864x1020px

>>56500487
>fact is tinfoil

Appletards are truly delusional.

>>56500512
>that pic
i'm no apple fanboy but have you even looked at the links you're promoting? every fucking business has the same blacklists. who the fuck wants to talk to a journalist that constantly writes negative shit about you? so of course you don't invite them to your promotions.

if you don't like some friend of your family, do you invite them to your birthdays or parties? of course not. this is the same type of shit.

>appletards
you're the one who;s a fucking retard who doesn't understand even basic social norms.

>>56500933
>every fucking business has the same blacklists.
>t. Appletard

>>56500955
you're a fucking moron, mr neckbeard.

>>56500933
Literally every laptop/pc maker sends review units out to the big name magazines/sites regardless of their review history. HP repeatedly gets slammed and still does it, Acer and Dell for their low end models as well.

The only one that throws a tantrum is Apple because their exploding overheating throttling toddler toys would get destroyed in comparison to real computers. Deal with it mackiddie.

>>56495088
we should spread the idea that quality of sound through wireless earphones degrades with distance or something
if you like the idea, we should make a thread about it

File: image.jpg (99KB, 604x604px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 604x604px

>>56500992
Everyone who senselessly bashes apple, just simply cannot afford it.jealousy breeds hate.
Premium costs premium, go back to your poverty tech and keep thinking you've made it.

>>56495088
to be fair samsung uses pentile screens instead of the normal RGB.
so 720p rgb > 1080p pentile

>>56501113
No it's people who actually care about there computers. People will spend 1200 dollars on a Macbook because "It just werks" and then literally only use their browser, when a Chromebook could do exactly the same thing just as well at a fraction of the price.

>>56501113
>audi
>premium

move out of the boondocks

>>56501326
chromebooks dont run os x though.

ive used several OS before and i think os x is my favorite, currently saving up money for a mac book air

File: image.jpg (16KB, 216x144px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 216x144px

>>56501326
Compare macbook and chromebook

>mfw

>>56501564
>Start a macbook, run chrome, connect to facebook
>Start a chromebook, run chrome, connect to facebook

??

>>56501643
people do more than just facedbook

it may be 750p, but it's a very optimised screen, which makes it perform pretty damn well
either way, i hope they upgrade it to 1080p with the next iPhone

>>56498622
Paying more for minimal gain is what I hate

>>56501730
Yes, like connecting to reddit, instagram, linkedin, their bank, amazon, spotify.

I don't know what delusions you have about the average users computer use, but most of them only use their browser on their computers.

File: ive-jpg.jpg (76KB, 841x714px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 841x714px

>>56501113

That's a big girl

>>56495088
BIG NUMBERS is an expectation of those manufacturers because they set the precedent, and its one of their main selling points, of course they'd get blown the fuck out gimping their devices in some way, even something so trivial as resolution

Apple's customer base doesn't share these expectations, they're buying into an experience and a name, not a bunch of numbers on a shelf talker

>>56498291
Saying that defending something makes you brainwashed is just as unreasonable as defending it for no reason

File: E1C69D3E27B892F3D6F12AFF039F7BF6685B22478FF096F28Apimgpsh_fullsize_distr.png (514KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

514KB, 640x640px

>caring what reviewers think
Lmao

>>56501869
>seriously replying to /v/
why do you people do this

File: 1473271344927.jpg (5KB, 251x240px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 251x240px

>>56501326
>"I care about my computer"
>buys a fucking chromebook

>>56501843
For you

>>56499163
>what will look better? OBVIOUSLY THE 1080P
but who fucking cares? longer battery life and better performance is much more important than infinitesimally smoother fonts all day long anyway

File: 0046 - CsJKOBy.jpg (290KB, 1052x1664px) Image search: [Google]

290KB, 1052x1664px

Explain this, people who believe in the you can't see any higher meme. This guy clearly knows what he's doing, and from y own experience the difference is obvious straight away.

>I've conducted some blind tests where a viewer had to sort 4 photos (150, 300, 600 and 600 ppi prints). The two 600 ppi were printed at 1200x1200 and 1200x2400 dpi. So far all have gotten the correct order of highest to lowest ppi (includes people up to age 50).

http://www.clarkvision.com/imagedetail/eye-resolution.html

>>56498441
Is this image real? It can't be

File: 1469643550047.jpg (866KB, 800x2500px) Image search: [Google]

866KB, 800x2500px

>>56501113
>go back to your poverty tech and keep thinking you've made it.
topkek

>>56502530

Kek that's true, I'm working at tesco through uni and everyone has a expensive phone, even full time workers.

I'm kind of disappointed by the lack of a headphone port. For some people wireless just isn't an option, take me for example.

I like to run an extra long wire from a pair of earbuds under my clothing and insert it to my urethra, winding nearly a foot of cord inside. Then I take public transit and wait for someone to snatch my headphones (I live in a pretty rough area) and feel the pure bliss as the 3.5mm jack scrapes the inside of my dick.

With Apple going away from corded headphones Android phones will be sure to follow suit before long and then I doubt anyone would bother to steal outdated wired earbuds at all.

>>56495088
The worst part about the earbuds is that ugly stem. Im sure a better design exists. It's like the pencil and the charging port on the mouse. Apple is stuck in group think.

File: 14231167_10209212450101359_7277741753237598388_o.jpg (44KB, 1004x706px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 1004x706px

>>56498441

>>56503089
I don't care about the adapter. It should come in the box though, and not be $40 or something ridiculous.

File: dIbSz.png (255KB, 352x473px) Image search: [Google]

255KB, 352x473px

>>56502892

>>56495088
did apple never stop to ask why nobody has produced two wireless earbuds before?

>>56500512
I don't know if it's true or not but that pic is literally hurting your case. Imagine when one of the top results for your so called theory is a GAWKER article.

>>56503235
>apple fan sites and major tech sites confirming it is discredited because gawker latched on

Fuck off retard/

>caring about stats on a mobile device

Enjoy your laggy unresponsive battery chugging piece of shit in 2 years while my 5S is still working perfectly fine.

File: 4059227.jpg (8KB, 212x212px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 212x212px

>>56502273
Where are the explanations?

File: shitpost.jpg (270KB, 538x752px) Image search: [Google]

270KB, 538x752px

>>56495088

>>56503452
>Still using a GS3
>Buying about 1 battery a year, under 10 dollars
>Can update the MicroSD if I want

Why even get a new phone?