it's over, Apple won, Samsuck is fin you fags sure got told

File: 1463416331663.jpg (33KB, 453x500px)

33KB, 453x500px

>samshit
Holy kek

>>56494591
Both companies bring out over-hyped,rushed phones every year. Go get a Oneplus bitch.

>>56494619
>samsuck

>>56494591

Normies are going to be turned off by no headphone jack.

Doesn't Apple use Samsung batteries tho

>>56494660
Just like they still won't buy Macs due to no optical drives amirite

This happened with iPhones before and its going to happen with phones in the future. Thats the price you pay when a good portion of your phone is basically explosive

File: stevejobs.png (16KB, 470x495px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 470x495px

>>56494692
>This happened with iPhones before

so, apple sold exploding iphones and had to issue a world wide recall on the entire product line after airports b& the devices on airplanes?

wow i just can't seem to recall hearing that in the news before.....

they are just butthurt over no headphone jack, even though they won't be buying one.

inb4 all other companies copy of apple like they normally do and remove headphone jacks from their phones next year

File: 1447987004280.jpg (71KB, 618x411px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 618x411px

>tfw when exynos s7 edge
>tfw zero brand loyalty and don't care about any problem with other models
>tfw neck and neck with 6s in speed

>Apple phones have touch disease
>Apple doesn't even acknowledge the issue and ignores customers with broken devices

>Samsung phones have battery issues
>Immediately acknowledges it and issues recall
Guess who won.

>>56494683
There's an objectively better alternative to the optical drive. What's the objectively better alternative to the headphone jack?

>>56494683
The reason they did that was because nobody was using optical drives to begin with. And many laptops had been released without one prior to that.

Also changing a technology that worked fine with a technology that works like shit is always a bad idea.

> 160$
> 5 hour battery
> if it falls of my ear while walking (cos people still do that ) I expect it to break/get crushed/lost.

File: 1361839282324.png (374KB, 717x698px) Image search: [Google]

374KB, 717x698px

>>56494813
>What's the objectively better alternative to the headphone jack?
normalfags don't care about bluetooth compression, so bluetooth is the objectively better alternative to 3.5mm.

>>56494894
>X is better than Y because people who don't care about X and Y say so
Do you have any idea what "objectively" means, you retard? It means displaced from an observer. There is no objective metric on which Bluetooth is superior.

>>56494894

Do you understand what objective means? How is wireless objectively better than an already set, tried and true standard every manufacturer in every country agreed on. We cant agree on anything elese, but the fucking 3.5mm audio jack was one.

>>56494913
thanks for correcting the record...

>>56494913
>Do you have any idea what "objectively" means
>>56494920
>Do you understand what objective means?
of course. 3.5mm is objectively superior to bluetooth but only if you understand how bluetooth works and give a shit about audio quality.

normalfags don't understand and don't care. all they know is that 3.5mm makes their phone thick and bluetooth doesn't, so bluetooth is "objectively" superior to them. only the poorest normalfags will give a shit about removing 3.5mm because they can't afford bluetooth headphones.

>>56494729
>>56494596
>>56494591

Why do you people use images of steve jobs laughing at the current affair of things when he is already dead?

>>56494894
or just use teh adapter...

>>56494591
It didn't take this incident to show that Samsung phones are shitty. They take Android and shove their bloatware into it and then let carriers add whatever else they want. This leads to lag and lack of updates.

>>56494948
why do people use a meme from a box of an xbox from 10 years ago?

because you are a newfag, that's why

>>56494797
As much as I dislike apple, they're advancing technology. Once everyone copies them and makes better alternatives, you'll be happy apple did what they did

>>56494977
Jesus Christ. How much are they paying you?

>>56494946
>normalfags don't understand and don't care
And that right there is a subjective metric, not an objective one. So your only point for bluetooth is that people who don't give a shit about quality like it more? [citation needed]
In that case Acer makes the best computers because people who don't give a shit about computers like them more.

>>56494946

It's subjectively better to them. Moron.

Objective means there is a truth - regardless of perspective.

As in 2 * 2 is 4, whether you can or cant count, or your religion say it isn't. It is still OBJECTIVELY 4. Subjective to your perspective its potato.

File: Screenshot_20160908-082427.png (257KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

257KB, 1440x2560px

>>56494983
I'm on android famalam

>>56494995
TouchJizz isn't android

>>56494984
>because people who don't give a shit about computers like them more.
that's wrong. normalfags like macs more.

here is how the normalfag views this:
bluetooth headphones don't have cords, allow me to charge my iphone 7 and listen to music at the same time, and sound just as good as my apple earbuds. they are so much better.

>>56494988
>As in 2 * 2 is 4, whether you can or cant count
only if you subjectively view 2 * 2 = 4 in a base 10 system.

/g/ always turns to complete shit whenever Apple releases something.
For some reason it seems to attract a ton of /v/ crossposters too, who feel the need to """discuss""" GPUs in 123 different threads.

>>56495017
>that's wrong. normalfags like macs more.
According to what? I definitely see more Acer and Asus around.
And my point was that even if the majority likes something more, that has nothing to do with how good that thing is. If most people liked blue more than other colors, would it be the best color? No, it's an ad populum.

Even if normalfags like this more (highly doubt it, they gain literally nothing), it's irrelevant.

>samshit fucks up and blows up

THAT DOESNT MATTER WHAT MATTERS IS APPLE REMOVE THE HEADPHONE JACK OMGOMG APLE SUK DONE


Lagdroid fanboys are so fucking stupid

File: _20160908_143359.jpg (48KB, 1080x242px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 1080x242px

>>56494683
>comparing the 3.5mm jack to CD drives

People had already stopped using CDs when apple removed CD drives from their products whereas the 3.5mm jack is still supported by 99% of existing audio equipment.

I get dibs

>>56495017

Mathematics is OBJECTIVE as true to the meaning of the word.

2 * 2 = 4 no matter if you believe otherwise. You can add a bunch of caveats to it. But the end result is the same.

You're argument 'regular' consumers think wireless is better is a subjective argument.

Either way, I think now you realize you are wrong and are arguing for fun. Enjoy your stupidity.

>>56495054
This person cannot grasp the difference between subject and objective. No point and trying to explain to this person over and over. He's probably a nigger anyway, or a feminist.

>>56495054
>And my point was that even if the majority likes something more, that has nothing to do with how good that thing is
stopped reading here. you're debating semantics because you think this is rebbit or you have autism or something. yes, i understand that bluetooth is OBjECTIVELY inferior to analog audio, but "objectively" better to normalfags because they don't give a shit about things like bluetooth compression. normalfags listen to 96kbps rips of youtube or radio music for fuck's sake.

>>56495021
There are dozens of GPU threads a day all year round. /v/ is a large part of /g/ unfortunately. Honestly it sounds like you're the tourist.

>>56495074
kill yourself lad. you're the same kind of human trash that comments "*You're" on youtube or plebbit.

File: 1472691422720.png (217KB, 798x275px)

217KB, 798x275px

>>56495061
They should have released an extended warranty program after having denied the issue for years amirite?

>>56495061
Samsung fucked up, admitted the mistake and made a full recall.
Apple fucked up (touched disease), ignored their customers.

>>56495078
>objectively better to normalfags

>objectively better
>to someone
I hope my kids never grow up to say shit like this. This isn't semantic, you're just wrong.

>>56494988
>Subjective to your perspective its potato
lel. nice.

>>56495113
refer to >>56495098

>>56495120
>>56495098
>omg stop showing me I'm wrong!

>>56495120
Not an argument
t. different guy

>>56494729
https://9to5mac.com/2016/03/21/iphone-6-fire-flight-hawaii/

https://9to5mac.com/2014/02/22/this-is-what-an-iphone-5s-looks-like-when-its-battery-catches-fire-and-explodes/

https://9to5mac.com/2016/08/02/iphone-6-fire-cycling-fall-australia/

https://9to5mac.com/2014/02/03/14yo-schoolgirl-receives-2nd-degree-burns-when-iphone-5c-reportedly-catches-fire-in-her-pocket/

ok

my Verizon s7 had an android update last night and when I ran it the phone got so hot I couldn't even hold it for more than about 10 seconds before I had to set it down. the metal side on the right was fucking ridiculous

>>56494591
What kind of autists spend their time making pictures like this

>>56494591
>>56494596
I love the smug look on his face

>>56495130
>>56495142
i'm not arguing against your autistic debate that i used objectively wrong. i'm arguing that normalfags will view bluetooth audio as "objectively" better than 3,5mm audio.

how pathetic do you have to be to sit there and ignore literally everything someone else says so you can focus on incorrect usage of words?

>>56495098

Oh, damn. Error in my spelling, but not my argument. Glad we got it straightened out.

>>56495163
13 year old /b/ tards
Why do you think there are currently 15 phone threads and 20 GPU threads on /g/?

While I think the removal of the 3.5mm Jack is the dumbest thing apple have done in a while why are people in this thread acting like Bluetooth isn't a universal standard across nearly every single mobile device and laptop released in the last five years?

>iphone can't do shit
>androids exploding

It's over, PCs won, smartphones are finished.

>>56495170

THEY CANNOT FUCKING VIEW IT AS OBJECTIVELY BETTER YOU FUCKING SCHMUCK.

OBJECTIVE IS TRUTH. They may view it as better, but not objectively. It's subjectively better to them. Objectively no matter what they think - the truth is wired is better.

WHY ARE YOU SO FUCKING STUPID?

>>56495198
>>THEY CANNOT FUCKING VIEW IT AS OBJECTIVELY
stopped reading here.

>>56495207

Because of reading comprehension level.

>>56495216
no, because you have autism and i'm not interested in debating the usage of words in quotations versus their figurative definitions.

>>56494948
because he's keking in heaven lad,that's why

>>56495170
>Idon't know what different means
>I totally disproved him by telling him to kill himself 1!1!1!1!!
>I started an argument on the internet because I can't even accept a trivial mistake but you are the autists guise

>>56495170
You seem to not get this. Let me try and explain this very, very slowly.
>i'm arguing that normalfags will view bluetooth audio as "objectively" better than 3,5mm audio.
This sentence is an oxymoron. It makes no sense. It's like saying last week you went on vacation to spaghetti meatballs. That's food, it's not a place, you can't 'go' there.
In that same fashion, someone can't view something as objectively good or bad. It's not possible. Something can BE OBJECTIVELY good or bad or it can be VIEWED AS SUBJECTIVELY good or bad.
The problem is, the sentences you use to admit your mistake themselves have that mistake. You say you misused the word, and then proceed to misuse it again.
>but then what would I say?
Normalfags subjectively view bluetooth as better, and then you give us a citation for your ridiculous claim.

>>56495108
>>56495113
Samshit fucked

>bbut bbut apple sux

Fags

>>56495232
>heaven
Should... should we tell him?

File: Good Job!.jpg (10KB, 199x314px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 199x314px

>>56495108
>Few events throughout the years equals to a global recall

>>56495284
>provides no counter-point

>>56495232
Homossexuals go to Hell dude.
t. Homossexual

>>56495284
>X sucks xDDD
Not an argument

>>56495288
>>56495300
oh yeah... I forgot... Thanks lads

>>56495071
>tfw phone companies brags about 5hr listening time per charge
I used to listen more than 9hrs on my old Xperia Ray and the battery wasn't even empty after that. Often on radio and such too which probably draws even more power.

>>56495295
The fact that they never did a recall just prove they're a shitty company that doesn't care about its customers. Thank you for shooting your own argument down.

>>56494986
roll for /pol/

>>56494986
/soc/, hopefully a guy at 285 Fulton St, New York will get it this sunday

>>56495312
Thats what you retards do constantly

>>56495300
What counter point you faggor, i said when samshit fucks up uts still about how apple sucks, there is this and every other thread about it as evidence, there is no need for counterpoint

>>56495277
didn't read.

>>56495324
When it comes to tech there can always be a a few baddies out of a bunch... when you get to the point of having to initiate a global recall it's because its more than a few. Stop lying to youreslf

>>56495334
>>/pol/
Stupid facist

>>56495300
>hell
Should... should we tell him?

>>56495318
Yeah because there is absolutely no changes made so new phones have stronger more power consuming hardware, some decade old shit tech is totally just like the ones today

>>56495344
Better luck next time, anon.

>>56495343
>uts still about how apple sucks
That's not what I said. You said Samsung sucked because of a particular issue on which they did a recall. I said Apple has had issues as well, except they didn't do a recall, which is worse.

>>56495353
Yes, touch disease was "a few baddies". Sure thing.

>>56495295
>only a specific model is affected
>35 reported incidents
>35 is less than "few" in comparison to the total amount of existing note 7s
>a global recall of all models is still issued

>>56494986
/sp/

>>56495343
>Thats what you retards do constantly
>NO U XDDDD

Not an argument

>>56495376
I said that samshit made a mistake and you lagdroid fanboys says it doesnt even matter because apple had made mistakes too

>>56495396
Where did I say it didn't matter? You seem to have a very big issue with proper quoting, anon.

>>56495393
Then why do you use it as an argument :]

>>56494986
Kys

/pol/

>>56495353
>~24 cases out of millions caused by a shitty battery manufacturer
>be ethical and initiate a recall
>somhoe a .01% chance this isn't a "few"
>implying anyone forced them to initiate the recall

/g/ gets more retarded by the day

>>56495418
NaA

>>56494986
Give the phone to /pol/ as a peace offering from the middle east

>>56495413
In this and every other thread abput the samsung issue

>>56495396
>doesn't matter

Nobody is saying that. People ITT started comparing these two companies because some shill felt the need to claim apple is better than samsung because of the recall. It isn't that unusual that poeple point out how apple responded to similar things in the past after that.

>>56495418
>no u xDD
Not an argument

>>56495453
99% of the thread is about how samshits mistake doesnt matter because apple sucks

>>56495444
Well I didn't.
In any case I'm not crucifying Samsung because they had about 30 cases and initiated a recall. Shit happens, and they handled it fine. It's not that it doesn't matter, it does of course, but their behavior was fine on this matter.
Apple on the other hand just ignored their own problem.

>>56495477
What thread? Where are you seeing people say that?

>>56495377
>>56495429

Why are you people so keen on defending your hand grenade phones? The recall not about "ethics" its about not getting sued and because they know there's more of them out there.

>>56494591
nexus is the only acceptable smart phone

>>56495477
>I can't read or can't comprehend what I read

>>56495490
Who cares? They acknowledged the mistake and made a recall, I couldn't care less why as long as they do it.

>>56495372
Because they definitely need to run on 100% to play music, besides the biggest power consumer, the screen, is is usually turned off when playing music.
Pretty sure my new chink phone could play music over 5hrs too.

>>56495143
>few cases vs a widespread problem that causes the company to recall every fucking phone

kek, samshit fags are really desperate

This wouldn't have happened if you got a Windows Phone.

>>56495555
Yes, those 35 phones, less than 0.01%, were a 'widespread problem'.
>b-but recall
That's a good thing, retard. The fact that they did a recall has nothing to do with how widespread it is.

File: 1469499496397-g.gif (436KB, 200x150px)

436KB, 200x150px

>mfw when the mobilefags have been let out of the zoo again

>>56495490
>The recall not about "ethics"

Nobody said otherwise and nobody would bring up apple's fuck ups and how they responded to those if shills didn't say that one company fucking up one phone makes it worse than another company.

>>56495585
>Nobody said otherwise and nobody

see >>56495429

File: back-in-the-days-trolling-meant-something.jpg (52KB, 470x600px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 470x600px

>>56494591
Still not going to buy crapple icrap

File: 1439226018859[1].png (190KB, 916x980px)

190KB, 916x980px

>>56495579
yes, they're recalling every phone because the problem only effects 0.01% of phones. Those gooks just love losing money.

>>56494797
and apple going out with we're going to sue they are stealing from us

>>56495605
>1 in 40 posters
>still can't respond to the main arguemnt and nitpicks on a word used in one certain post

>>56495555
>precautionary measure
>"""widespread"""

Would you have preferred they pretended it didn't exist- the numbers are small enough that this would easily be possible.

How much are you being paid to pretend to be this retarded?

>>56495605
No one elected that guy ambassador of /g/. I can go on /x/ right now and find someone saying the Earth is flat.
It doesn't matter if they did it out of ethics or not (and we can't know because they had to do it to not get sued, even if they wanted to). They did it and that's the only thing that matters.
If you want an emotional attachment to a company, find a mom and dad bakery or hand-made knives. Not a company rich enough to buy a country.

>>56495626
Ok, prove me wrong. Show me a source saying it affected more than that.

>>56494591
UUHH yea fuck you and all apple shills alike. Have fun with your wireless headphones bitch!

>>56494591
http://gizmodo.com/an-iphone-is-the-latest-thing-to-catch-fire-on-a-plane-1766081044

>>56495652>>56495657
>1 in 40 posters
>No one elected that guy ambassador of /g/, can go on /x/ right now and find someone saying the Earth is flat.

Jeez talk about not having an argument... I already made my point. Hand grenades had to issue a recall while Apple has had some isolated events which you and some other ass blasted children are trying to make seem on par with a global recall...

>>56495742
And you keep pretending not to understand my point: the fact that they did a global recall is a good thing and has nothing to do with being a widespread issue. They could make a recall over a single phone exploding. If you want to show me this isn't an isolated event of 35 phones which are less than 0.01%, provide a source.

>>56495657
The reason there's a global recall is because it's a widespread problem, Unless you think Samsung are wasting money for no reason.

>>56495742
You Apple Trolls are pathetic !

>>56495772
>The reason there's a global recall is because it's a widespread problem
Do you have any proof of this? I've asked 3 times now.
>Unless you think Samsung are wasting money for no reason.
It's not "no reason", they don't want to get sued.

Somehow you're having a huge problem in understanding this.

>>56495742
>35 in more than a million sold phones
>widespread

Repeating something won't make it become reality

>>56495816
>>56495771

see >>56495772

>>56495772
Apple would just ignore phones in other parts of the world

i fucking hate recaptcha!

>>56494591
Samshit brought it in themselves, could've stuck to releasing the note series once every year.

Question is, are the batts removable?
This recall could've been avoided if you could just swap batts out


>>56494649
> Both companies bring out over-hyped,rushed phones every year. Go get a Oneplus bitch.

>Trusting chinamen in charge of QC
lmao

>>56495838
see >>56495812
Repeating "it's a widespread problem because there was a recall" over and over does not amount to an argument.

>>56495812
>It's not "no reason", they don't want to get sued.

which means it's a big problem, surely getting sued by a few people costs less than recalling every single phone?

File: iphonecolors1.jpg (450KB, 1920x1440px) Image search: [Google]

450KB, 1920x1440px

>>56494729
No, when Apple devices have problems, they deny it. I don't know of any other company (besides chinky ones) that acts like that.

>>56495860
Dragging this to court would be bad for them and probably cost more than the recall. This has nothing to do with being widespread or not, they could get sued for millions by a single person.

>>56494986
move it top /pol/

>>56495860
You do realize that such a lawsuit would damage their reputation more, which would lose them a lot more money, right?

>>56495911
first dubs of my lyfe O_O

>>56494683
Optical drives on Apple machines used to break after a year anyway

>>56495874
> Apple is pumping out defective products but people don't know it because Apple don't acknowledge it themselves!

That's cool info senpai, by the way you should also read about chemtrails and Alex Jones sick shit's happening out there.

>>56494591
>Samshit
>Applefags

basically the same thing.

>>56495889
It would have still been less, see ford.

>>56495944
holy shit im on fire

File: 13651958823ugJVGwXJH_1_1_l.jpg (222KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 1024x768px

>>56495974
My point is that they refuse to fix them by claiming it doesn't exist, retard.

See iPhone 4 antenna: broken design, never recalled. Or iBend6. Or touch disease. Those are design flaws. What's worse is that iToddlers will actually defend this, when they are the only victims.

>>56494797
Motorola has already figured out that removing the headphone jack from the Moto Z was a bad idea and they put it back in the Moto Z Play

>>56495361
hello summer

>>56495504
>no mSD slot
Triple shit

Bahahaha Samsung fags will defend this.

>>56494986
>>>/mlp/28366666
what now?

>>56496104

most phones have problems, but you don't see global recalls every day because most phones aren't trying to fucking kill you

>>56494591
I aint even scared

>>56495490
Ifags want to talk ethics when they have to put suicide nets up were their phones made.

>>56496557
> trying this hard to justify selling a phone that can't phone

ITS AN EXPODING PHONE!!

File: 0.png (485KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

485KB, 1440x2560px

>>56496381
No, well maybe the autistic ones, but fucking Samsung I swear... I listened to other people and didn't make my own decision so I got an S7.

Easily the worst purchase I made in years. To be fair, I'm not really a fan of Android, but I like what it can do. If anything, I should have gotten a Nexus. Fucking Samsung with their TouchWiz locked bootloader bullshit.

I can't even opt in for Android N. And they say we'll get it March of next year if we're lucky. Probably because Samsung is hard at work adding their shitty bloatware. This is a premium phone by the way... Arguably the best Android phone you can get right now and you can't get Android N? The fuck.

I'm done with Samsung and Android. I gave it a chance, I listened to you shills, and didn't get an iPhone like a normal person. Well, come Friday, I'm going to preorder the white iPhone 7 in 256 GB and finally have a good phone. S7 is just a ripoff iPhone anyways.

>>56497748
iphone is better anyways. and on a plus side, it does not blow up

>>56494894
Dumb anime poster

>>56494797
>inb4 all other companies copy of apple like they normally do and remove headphone jacks from their phones next year

I'm sure they'll think that over if there is backlash over the iPhone. Even loyal customers are upset, according to MSM.

File: WP_000266_23323598.jpg (147KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 1024x768px

>>56498217

File: 24fd4ba660045992a3e6a349462e6b805829ef7d.png (240KB, 511x381px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 511x381px

>>56498329

>>56498296
dumb dyel poster

>>56494591
Stupid ass thread.
Who the fuck cares?

If theyre fighting eachother to make a better product I think I personally won.

File: 1470031158124.gif (2MB, 374x254px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 374x254px

Ferrari makes cars that randomly catch on fire. They do nothing about it.
Porsche had a problem with their GT3 engine catching on fire, so they replaced the engine in every single GT3 they had sold.
Porsche is a good guy. Samsung is Porsche.

Samsung is shit anyway, just ad apple. Motorola all the way .
Quality/price ok
Little bloatware
Infinite ota updates
Still sporting my cheap first gen moto g. Runs like clockwork

All I wanna know is how can a global company with billions of dollars like Samsung fuck up something like this so badly? Do they have zero quality control? They didn't test out any prototypes beforehand? What a bunch of wankers.

appleshills in full force after the massive failure of yesterday

>>56499569
>a-a-apleshills!!!!!
>yes let's blame Samsung for designing ticking timebombs on Apple, that'll always work

Are you 12?

>>56499070
owned by the chinks now tho