>$159.99 for wireless earpods P R O G R E S S R O G R E S S

>>56484359
Doesn't matter.
Apple sheep will eat that shit up

>>56484359
jaybird wireless headphones run 80-200 dollars, and the price has been like that for years

anyone complaining about the price is dumb as fuck and not connected to the cost of decent wireless headphones

these also have better wireless technology than standard bluetooth and better microphone than any wireless headphones out

>100 dollar stylus
>160 dollar earbuds
>100 dollar battery case
What's next a 200 screen protector?

>>56484437
Forgot the inevitable
>"we at apple are also offering 1 wireless airpod for $79.99 just incase you misplace one. We have your back."

>>56484359

But they have Beats quality sound desu!

lmao poorfags

Apple is top quality at the right price

>>56484359
I make more than that in an hour. Seems a reasonable price.

>>56484359
And it's $299.95 for a pair of Beats Solo 3
Who the fuck cares?

>>56485003
>P R O G R E S S
>R
>O
>G
>R
>E
>S
>S

A CAR COSTS MORE THAN A HORSE FUCK TECHNOLOGICAK PROGRESSION :@@

>>56484535
> keep in case when not in use
> while in use, one side falls out of ear
> notice immediately because something fell out of your ear and no audio is playing
> look on ground and pick up

Android fags are worried about the users of these headphones because they are used to living in third world countries where the streets are giant sewer grates

File: 1298664933797.jpg (30KB, 275x300px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 275x300px

>>56485105
>mfw my car costs less than a fucking horse

>>56485003

>Beats Headphones
>"Quality"

>>56484359
keks macfags are so stupid

>>56485149
Oh look at the hipster who hates popular stuff

>>56485112

My earbuds don't fall out, fuckboi. And if they did, they're attached to a cord, so they won't hit the ground.

>>56485003

Rather be a poorfag than a gayfag 2bh

>>56485166

You mean hates shitty stuff?

Beats are literally the Monster Cables of headphones.

>>56485105
you have never bought a horse

File: 1471821469025.gif (2MB, 360x270px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 360x270px

>>56484359
>kek

Why was Phil Schiller introducing the product and not the real product team anymore?

>>56485180
> trying to advertise a fault as a solution

How come you never see professional photographers using their iPhones to take photos?

>>56484408
>Good goy believe in the marketing schema

>>56485215

>putting shit in his ear, immediately after picking it up off the ground

itt : triggered assblasted GNU/NEETs

File: plebeian.jpg (51KB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 720x540px

>>56485112
you will look like the most stupid ass nigger ever when they fall out in the subway and end up under a seat or in some difficult to reach disgusting space. have fun i guess, because everyone else will too, laughing at you

File: image.jpg (68KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 600x600px

>>56484535

is bluetooth in any way deteriorating sound quality compared to wired headphones?

>>56485164
They are just as retarded as gaydroid fans, both group is autistic as hell

>>56485218
How come you never see professional photographers using their cheap chinkphones to take photos?

inb4 thiefs begin pulling them out of peoples ears and running.

>>56485207
Retarded faggot

>>56485203
Beats have good sound quality you hipsterbabby, expensive as fuck but still good sound quality, better than a similiarly priced sony

File: 1300044776986.jpg (17KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 250x250px

>>56484408
>wireless earbuds
>worth any more than $3.50

>>56484408

That's not a great comparison. All of the Jaybird Bluetooth headphones have shitty reviews.

>>56485323
Yes

>>56485020
>I only have to suck 4 dicks to get these

what in the fuck? who why? $160 is like a month of food for me.

>>56485433

Apple users don't much, due to lack of funds from buying the latest product. That's why most of them look like present-day Jobs.

>>56485433
You want to be that pedestrian with wired earphones??

>>56485344
Because if you're a professional photographer you're a retard.

>>56485384
proof?

>>56485465

don't eat much

>>56485480
someone on /g/ said so

>>56484408
>decent wireless headphones
heh

>>56484408
The technology cost is clearly not the issue here. The issue are the marketing behind them. Bluetooth has long been implemented and they sell stereo WAN streamers such as the CSR8645 and the RN52 for ages, and support not only firmware flashing, but the 4.1 protocol for low power BT protocols, primitive speech recognition, and hardware side equalizers. What these companies do is simply shrink them, add a LIPo and a entry tier driver with uncomfortable, plasticky tips and vents and call it their progeny. If one could open source a pair, you could build it under 10 bucks (the controller runs about 7), and this isn't even at bulk quantity. To iterate, there has been no headphones out there worth its salt, and building it on some proprietary platform at a premium is even worse of a deal than a regular Bluetooth headphones with known specifications and thresholds.

>>56485379
Okay? So what would be comparable for a COMPLETELY WIRELESS solution, with no connection from earbud to earbud. Are you googling you droidfag? Google harder because there are like 3 that exist

>>56485376
>Beats have good sound quality

Not according to every audio magazine ever. It's not even up for debate. Even the new Studio Wireless model is pretty shit. You can get better quality headphones < $100.

>>56484408

Android user here. He's right. Good wireless headphones have always been stupidly expensive.

>>56485323
There is a higher level of fidelity through an analog 3.5mm jack vs a digital signal.

Allahu' Ackbar.

>>56485517

See --> >>56485507

File: aussie.png (9KB, 258x324px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 258x324px

>>56485376
>Beats have good sound quality

>>56485466
i dont even use headphones in public. i dont even like music enough to have to listen to it while im walking around and shit.

File: headphone guide.png (316KB, 1000x533px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 1000x533px

>>56485376

People that think Beats are the shit are the same Fucking hipsters you see drinking Blue Moon and Shock Top because they think they are microbrews.

>>56484408
>Apple headphones with bluetooth wedged into them
>Good
Pick one, my mindless friend. Not arguing that there are no good (and not cheap) bluetooth headphones out there, but 159 for the sort of headphones Apple shits out is painful.

>>56485771
Nonsense - Beats are shit, Blue Moon is tolerable, your a faget

File: 2nd_amendment.jpg (127KB, 960x640px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 960x640px

>>56485281
>kind of tired in the morning
>riding the subway
>take out earbuds, shaky hands, drop one
>mfw 80 dollars gone for good

>>56485771
i like both those beers.

do you go anywhere else but outback, or are you a flyover hillbilly white cracka?

so..

you can either use the bluetooth wireless headphones that have lesser audio quality

or you can use an adapter that needs to be CHARGED to plug in your own headphones

also do the wireless headphones come with the device or you need to buy it separately?

>be me
>spend half my community college loan on iPhone 7
>know i'm going to lose my virginity now
>seen all dem fine white girls at starbucks
>pop dem AirPods in dem ears
>JayZ playin
>aight
>aight
>be dancin down the street
>uh oh
>i spot my arch nemesis jamal on da corner
>i turn an run
>goin about 80mph
>he pursues ,matching my speed
>AH
>muh AirPod fall off
>shit man dat costs as much muh part da rent
>decide to turn and rescue
>Jamal closin in
>i dive for my airpod
>darkness
>i awake in an alleyway with my pants around my ankels
>airpodsless

>>56485946
At that price I'd assume separately.

>>56485924

That's pretty funny, because both of those Beers are served at Outback.

>>56485215
>implying a wire is a fault
>>>/r/eddit

>>56484359
It's not bad price, to be quite honest. Though, I highly doubt I'd be able to keep them for awhile because I'd lose them in the first 24 hours of having them.

>>56486709
What are the odds they have zero bass?

Doctor Who was right

http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/EarPod

>>56486034
kek

>>56486034
>not removing your kidneys

jamal lacks vision and iniciative

The sad thing is that no one could tell these from $3.50 pack-in buds in an A/B test. They're that good now.

Capitalism has failed because people are just too dumb.

File: SHE2100PP_28-PID-global-001.jpg (156KB, 1250x2400px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 1250x2400px

>>56484359
>have to recharge from 5 in 5 ours
D R O P P E D
R
O
P
P
E
D

File: 160dollaz.png (994KB, 708x958px) Image search: [Google]

994KB, 708x958px

>>56484359
Hey! I'm very familiar with this product!

First off, the price is actually a lot lower than what I was expecting. The cost of materials alone makes profit margins almost nonexistant, let alone all the development cost this product has gone through (roughly five years). That's a lot of manhours and a lot of investment. I think they're pricing it so low to get people on board with a wireless audio future. Most people involved with the product were expecting them to retail as a luxury accessory for over 300$, based on what they are and what's gone into them.

>>56484770
They actually sound pretty great. I tried beats ages ago and hated them, but these sound good, and blow me away considering they're packed with electronics. No idea how they made it sound good with all that shit in the audio chamber area.

They fit really well in my ears. I couldn't shake them out when I tried. I feel bad for the people that they don't fit well in, because they're a dope product. Mainly if you've got the watch and the phone and can use the magical pairing to whatever you're playing shit from mode. It's awesome.

>>56485214
A lot of the product team was in the stands, but they've been working crazy overtime to get shit ready for today, so no time to rehearse and shit. Plus, switching off for all the different teams would have been rough.

>>56485323
No. DACs are in each earbud, and they're good enough that they sound awesome to me. I used to consider myself an "audiophile," I even tried out STAX 009s and those planar magnetic ones that aren't made by China. AirPods sound good to me, but maybe I can't perceive the difference because I have tinnitus, or maybe because I'm not a huge placebo munching faggot.

>>56485465
Apple corporate probably prefers to think they look like that because they're filling all their circles on their apple watches.

>>56485539
You're literally retarded. Analog transmission can only deteriorate a signal. That's why digital exists in the first place.

>>56484359
>4 hours
how can you even begin to damage control this?
I feel sorry for whoever has to update the shill manual for these

>>56484359
God forbid for someone to make new, expensive technology without any flack.

The Airpods look small as hell and you more likely losing them. I can see why they cost a lot being that small.

>>56484437
>What's next a 200 screen protector?
I know a dipshit that bought actually $200 iPhone screen protector like a year ago now
He also dropped his phone while drunk one night and it shattered everywhere

>>56486944
I'm this asshole.

>>56486952
4 hours of what?

I think the most legitimate concern is losing them, but having lived with them for a while, the case makes not losing them feel a whole ton more manageable. Plus, I never have to worry about tangled cables!

>>56486988
>4 hours of what?
I hope you're pretending

>>56487012
I'm not pretending, I don't know what Apple marketing is saying about shit. I haven't heard four hours anywhere. Five hours of continuous music playback I've heard, but if you take them out of your ears and store them into the case (which you would unless you want to lose them), they charge back up pretty fast.

>>56484359
C A P I T A L I S M
A
P
I
T
A
L
I
S
M

>>56485539
>analog

and this is why I literally never listen to a word fucking /g/ has to say.

File: 1441406852337.gif (2MB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 200x200px

>5hr battery life

>>56487098
What do you do that you need more than five hours of continuous music playback on a regular basis?

>>56487058

five hours of continuous music playback is a long friggin time. The most I ever listen to music is 60 minutes, 90 minutes tops. Also, 99% of all movies don't go beyond two hours.

People that need more than a continuous 5 hour charge are probably detached antisocial bipolar sociopaths.

Seriously, FIVE HOURS of listening to music is serious autist next level brain damage.

>>56487121
I skate longer than that every day.
>needing to charge your headphones
>ever

>>56487121
I work you leet piece of shit

>>56485376
>hipsterbaby
More like not a faggot that doesn't research his investments/wears it because it's "cool". You're literally paying for the icon.

File: l.jpg (214KB, 800x1136px) Image search: [Google]

214KB, 800x1136px

FIVE HOURS
ONE HUNDRED SIXTY DOLLARS

>>56487154
I'm thinking if you're needing more than five hours while you're mobile, you're an edge case for sure. If you're lurking on your desktop, you might as well use the DAC you shilled for and use your audiophile cans, too. It's not like you're not allowed to use wired headphones anymore. People really love to hate Apple.

>>56487172

work? 5 hours straight, without a break? bullfcuking shit. first off, you're a chantard, that in itself screams NEETdom or lazy dipshit drug addled lazy fuckup.

>>56487172
>>56487196

WHAT WORK DO YOU DO?? What work do you do that prevents you from using a more stationary setups, and simulatneously needs you to work for five hours in a row, but ALSO doesn't require you to be able to hear safety warnings and have no buds in at all (factory work/landscaping shit). I hope you realize that this is a serious rarity.

>>56487214
Not him but I work 8hrs straight without a break

File: 1203622889390.jpg (51KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 500x500px

>People actually defending wireless earbud in /g/

Techloligy died for this?

What next, wireless headphone?

>>56487263
Does your job require you to be moving around mobile-like all the time and still allow you to be listening to music while performing it? I'm actually seriously curious what sorts of jobs fall into this category.

>>56485259
Haha, you KNOW this shit will happen to you. But you'll still cough up the 160$ anyway and shill about how great the customer support was. Then everyone else will be laughing at YOU as you walk out with your empty wallet from the empty Apple store.

File: 1425237401821.jpg (63KB, 621x720px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 621x720px

>>56487202
>listen to music for more than five hours with lightning headphone dongle
>phone goes dead because you can't charge it while listening to music
IT
JUST
WORKS

>>56487238

You can just use one ear and not be a retard in those situations.
In factory work I've done I could certainly use 12+ hours of battery life. Sometimes 20+ hours in a row.

>>56487263


>works 8 hours straight
>thinks browsing porn is work

>>56487195
Im not paying forni just tried it out and it has a good clear sound

>>56485593
>>56485654
>>56485519
I tried it out, liked it and nothing you show will change that hipsterfags

>>56487292
FUCK

>>56484408
> bait.jpg
There's always a huge cuntfaggot who's placing shit bait to trigger the autism league.

Sincerely, f u c k o f f.

>>56487288
Yes

>>56487298
I mean 8 hours of doing what I'm paid to do

Hah, good thing I'm not stupid or prone to wasting extravagant amounts of money that can be used to purchase into my mutual fund accounts.

I'm honestly amazed at just how awful Apple has been performing under Tim Cook as far as production choices. The Mac Pro "Trashcan" model is such an incredible downgrade from the Xeon 2009 models that we operate at work.

>>56485259

Then to complete the picture the BLM bro starts blaming everyone around him because he lost his shit. It's all everyone elses fault and he starts chimping out and pumping his chest.
Thank you Apple for giving them more reason to throw a spear chucking fit and ruin everyone elses day someday in the fucking future.
Thank you Apple you cucks

apple """""reinventing"""""" something that's been around for years and charges 1/2 a soul for it isn't news, anon.

>>56487292
Well, I'm thinking if you're in this strange situation, you can use another product, like a desktop PC with a pair of wired headphones. Even still, the new phone's battery lasts a long time. Every time I'm listening to music for ages, I'm either bluetoothing in my car, or at a desktop and not mobile. AirPods are awesome for their intended purpose: being mobile, or exercising/running stuff.

>>56484359
http://www.plantronics.com/us/product/backbeat-fit

I got these two years ago for 100€. Longer battery life, waterproof, more durable. Apple is innovating again.

>>56487202
More like disappointed, they bring nothing new to the table

>>56487295
If you're using only one bud, the other one can be charging in the case. You've checkmated yourself, nig. You know the case has a battery and charges the buds, and that they can be used one at a time while the other is off, right? If you've only got one ear/can only use one, then there's an issue, I guess.

File: 1233441231492s.jpg (83KB, 255x255px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 255x255px

>>56487322
>I'm honestly amazed at just how awful Apple has been performing under Tim Cook as far as production choices
>tfw watching the new apple is like watching Silicon Valley tv comedy series.

>>56487381
It's like a horrible, horrible reflection of the pre-Jobs era but with obsessive "minimalist innovation" instead of stagnation.

>>56487295
20 hours of factory work in a row? no way that's legal. Where do you work? The Apple manufacturing plant in China?

>>56487321
You still haven't even given a hint at what you do, faggot.

>>56487348
>to solve the issue with the device simply use a device instead
brilliant! apple does it again!

>>56484402
Pretty much. Apple's branding relies heavily on selling an image, not actual products. It's no mistake that they chose to use the word "courage" in their release: they want their users to feel superior, they want people to buy into that image.

They've been doing this for decades.

>>56487420

I start suspecting that you people are actually retarded, but then I remember that I'm browsing 4chan, and then it's perfectly clear that you are.

>>56485228

and here I thought we'd see an apple user being spitroasted by airpod dicks.

File: we must go thinner.jpg (678KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

678KB, 1200x800px

>>56487398
>with obsessive "minimalist innovation"

MY SIDE!

>>56487348
>Apple is the first one to make Bluetooth ear buds

>>56487121
I listen to audio books during my commute to work and music when I am working.

>>56487406
Not OP, but I listen to music and code for more than 5 hours non-stop at my workstation. I would hate having to recharge them during workday.

>>56487398
The oddest thing is, unlike that pre-Jobs era, they're still selling. Even the Mac Pro still gets orders, it still has the specs from Dec 2013 and still gets orders.

>>56487473
>>56487472

I don't understand why you HAVE to use this product, then. If it doesn't fit your use-case, don't get it. That said, I don't see why you can't code and simultaneously listen to music from your machine.

>>56487523
>I don't understand why you HAVE to use this product, then

Nice goalpost.

>>56487523
Cause the machine I code on isn't connected to the Internet for security reasons?

Also I am giving you scenarios where a person can listen to audio for more than 5 hours. Also I need to charge my phone and be able to listen to music still.

>>56484408
You seemed to have missed the memo that wireless headphones or a shitty adapter (that will also be ludicrously expensive) will be the only options for people with iPhones.

>>56487523
> I don't understand why you HAVE to use this product
Did you not see the point of this thread is that these earbuds suck, especially at this price point. I'm telling you exactly how it doesn't fill my needs and that my needs aren't unique.

is it like the regular earbuds here they bulk buy a bunch of $4 Chinese headphones and paint them white and sell them for like $20?

>>56487348
>I'm thinking if you're in this strange situation, you can use another product, like a desktop PC

Yes, because everyone leaves their computer on when they're listening to music while going to sleep

Oh wait, is listening to music in bed another one of these "strange situations" that aren't worth considering, Mister Cook?

>>56487637
>>56487583

They're a pretty dope product. I'm using them now, they sound great, and they hashtag just werk. I've also got several other pairs of bluetooth headphones, these are the ones I choose to use. I'm not happy that the headphone jack is gone, but I haven't spent a lot of time with my iPhone 7 yet, so who knows if I'll end up actually missing it. I was pissed when they took out the optical drive, but then I never used it, so maybe it's gonna be one of those situations, rather than a firewire situation.

>>56487650
There's a lot of work that went into the AirPods, and they're pretty damn good considering they've fit all of the electronics in there, too.

>>56486944
COMEDY GOLD HOLY FUCK I CANT STOP LAUGHING

TOP NOTCH POST ANON

>>56487406

Misc Seafood Processing, Somewhere in Alaska.

>>56487693
>listening to music in bed
This is why the smaller Sonos devices exist

>>56486944
>>56487523
>>56487700
Faggot shills fuck off

File: 1455270119509.gif (2MB, 230x175px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 230x175px

>>56485139
underrated

>>56487369
>It stops playing when you take it out

>>56487693
Do you sleep with earbuds in? That sounds painful. Yeah, I guess wireless earbuds don't do well for overnight listening sessions.

>>56487722
That's pretty interesting. Never knew anybody that's done anything like that. You'll love Apple's Apple Watch Series 2 with new ceramic case! It's now rated as water resistant, so you can happily gore fish and squid without worrying about damaging your favourite Apple trademark smartwatch! Seriously though, I've never known anybody with this sort of job, and know nothing about it.

>>56487762
Bitch, please. Go back to your sissy thread. You're gayer than Tim Cook.

>>56487583
>the machine I code on isn't connected to the Internet for security reasons
That's pretty hardcore bro - you work for a defence contractor or something?

>>56484359
I just don't understand how they can only last 5 hours

>>56487777
you can start it again. There's a whole selling point that you can use them one at a time if you want. You can even turn off the in-ear-detect if you want.

>>56487784
The product is literally the size of their regular, wired earbuds, and has a shitload of circuitry in them, so there's not a lot of room for battery. On top of that, it has to handle RF and DAC, as well as a bunch of other sensors that it's processing data from all the time. It's more a question of "How the fuck can they last five hours!?" to an engineer.

>>56487784
That doesn't seem that bad considering how small they are, and how they have to (or should even as an Apple product) produce better sound that a shitty bluetooth headset while being smaller than one.

>>56487779
That shill is not even trying anymore. You convince nobody man, just stop. We came to discuss how all these manhours came into a bullshit product at an unviable price point which have the disadvantage of fucking requiring you to plug in shit earbuds that are normally used when you don't have other nicer headphones. Fuck off to your missed investment land and just hope to make more money out of the beat beta phones which Apple paid gazillions to acquire so that they can keep selling more plastic to retard faggots who want to impress their friend and distance themselves from their proletariat heritage.

>>56487784

size. how big do you think the battery is?

samsung gear iconx headphones only have 1.6 hours of bluetooth playback.

>>56487815
>he MUST reply to every comment in the thread telling people why it's such a great product

how much are you paid per post, wagie?

>>56487779
>You'll love Apple's Apple Watch Series 2 with new ceramic case! It's now rated as water resistant, so you can happily gore fish and squid without worrying about damaging your favourite Apple trademark smartwatch!

ceramic is more resistant to scratches, but it can shatter if dropped.

>>56487460
aw dude that's just sad.

File: 1451089634692.png (217KB, 447x547px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 447x547px

>>56484359
>They can only play transcoded AAC's

wew

>>56487835
We'll see how they're received by the general public. I'm enjoying them a lot, but the most impressive bits are when you're pairing, and when you're using the watch and the phone and switch between. That's something other BT headphones can't do, and is super convenient. I think they'll do well.

>>56487870
>using the watch
Well now we really know you're shilling

>>56487870
EVERYTHING HE POSTS IS COMEDY GOLD

HOW DOES HE KEEP DOING IT

>>56487870
> Buy all Apple products, you'll see it's great!
Sure you retard shill, sure. Or I could buy actual headphones which will work with ALL products. Oh but that can't be good, other companies must be defeated.

>>56487865
They're bluetooth headphones. They can play anything that shits bluetooth audio over A2DP or HFP (the same protocols Android uses).

>>56487305
Ignorance really is bliss

>>56487899
I kek'd. Good one. To be fair, I got the watch for free. I don't really believe in it. I just thought the bluetooth swapping was super impressive (technically).

>>56485218
>>56485344
They do use them. Assuming they don't have their real camera ready and in their hands. Which would be rare, considering its their job to have it ready.

What is the W1 chip exactly? What does it do differently than other Bluetooth chips?

>>56487870
Wow. No-where else, ever, have I met in real life or otherwise consumer whores on the level that you can find on /g/. Whatever makes you happy, anon.

>>56487925
> got the watch for free
Lol, well I have to pay for my stuff and when you do, you'll realize that won't be worth it.

>>56487938
It's a shill dude, he's paid to convince people that they're good from the inside. Thing is it probably works like 30% of the time and that's sad. (being conservative here)

>>56487928
can confirm

>>56487865

aac is the better quality codec that apple devices can support over bluetooth.

the default is sbc.

no apple products appear to support aptx, the other higher quality codec.

>>56487939
I do realize I wouldn't buy a watch. They don't really do anything. I was pretty excited about the GPS module in it, though. That, and it being waterproof give me a use case: when I'm canoeing in the middle of nowhere, which happens a couple times a year. That's pretty much the only value it would add to my life though.

>>56487452
>shilling Apple
>look how superior and smart I am compared to you 4chan users

>>56487870

bose bluetooth headphones supports pairing with multiple devices, e.g. an iphone and a mac, if you use their iOS app.

>>56487933
A wireless chip that Apple designed for its new wireless protocol. It basically does everything Apple wanted out of Bluetooth

>>56487305
>I tried it out, liked it and nothing you show will change that hipsterfags
Been awhile since I've seen someone so proud of their own ignorance.
Congratulations on being so stubbornly close minded, I guess.

>>56484437
Then a $300 charger and a $150 cable

>>56487996
Pairing with multiple things at the same time shouldn't be doable as a slave device on Bluetooth. What happens if you try to play music on both devices at once?

so if one falls out of your ear you're just fucked? GR8 JOB APPLE

>>56488043
One is chosen and there's usually an algorithm to switch between them (if one stops and another starts or is already running, switch to it). Got a bose wireless speaker and it does exactly that, accepting two devices.

>>56484359
>$200
That's literally nothing you worthless NEET. I spend more than that before lunch.

File: wireless shit buds.png (193KB, 962x407px)

193KB, 962x407px

Honestly i've never heard good fully wireless earbuds. The last i bought were ~$80 and they were so bad I got my money back.

>>56488131
$40 cheaper than that actually. Apple is practically giving these away.

>>56486944
Apple marketing pls go

>>56487069
consumertardism

>>56487238
>damage control this bad for shitty 5hr wireless meme headphones that no one asked for
how much do they pay you?

>>56488138

That's because they don't exist. The only reason to wear such a thing would be for convenience, because you will be sacrificing sound quality.

>>56484359
No thanks, I'll be sticking to 3.5mm jacks

>>56484359
Wouldn't I get a far better headphones with kind of money?

>>56488852
but then you wouldn't be against le PROGRESS

File: 1457749400071.jpg (40KB, 353x357px)

40KB, 353x357px

>>56484359
Does anyone else picture apple bringing back the headphone jack on 7S after hearing backlash? I don't know why but I can see this happening

wow it's almost like you can just

wait for it

not buy them and use other bluetooth earbuds

you know damn well apple is infamous for having overpriced accessories so just don't buy them, it's that simple

>>56485654
as much as I think beats are overpriced and have poop build quality, to say that a flat frequency response is objectively better is just wrong

some people prefer a more bass heavy, treble heavy, etc sound - anyone using beats as monitors should know better

>>56485654
I thought Sennheiser was better

>>56486944
>K Y S
>Y S K
>S K Y

>>56488166
>>56487762
Apple doesn't talk about products, they talk about image.

Their customers don't care about features, they care about buying into Apple's brand. Steve Jobs could've sold shit on a stick and people would've said how it revolutionized the weapon industry.

>>56489384
>Their customers don't care about features, they care about buying into Apple's brand. Steve Jobs could've sold shit on a stick and people would've said how it revolutionized the weapon industry.

kek
I'm sure you sound like your dad.

>>56485376
Didn't beats literally put weights inside their sets to give them a supposed higher quality feel? Or is this commonplace

>>56484408
Wonder who can be behind this post

>>56484359

The sound compression must be horrid with device this small. I bet your ass you can't transmit FLACs and since apple are huge fags with their itunes bullshit they will just convert all the high quality music you put on you iBone to 160kbps garbage just so you can use it with your "wireless" earshits.

uh guys, where are the volume buttons?

>>56489420
It's common in a lot of headphones actually, the difference with Beats is they really seem to make an extra effort to trick people into thinking they are great headphones when they aren't, with all their celebrity endorsements and things as well. Supposedly the newer Beats are at least decent though, overpriced, but still okay.

>listening to musing whilst having a piss
>One falls in

>Jogging
>One falls down a gutter

>lose one down the back of the couch

>Some nigger on the train steals one out of your ear.


This is going to be glorious

Apple is literally modern art in tech form
>Whoa, they got rid of the headphone jack!
>so daring!
>So controversial!

>>56489565

Yes the new Beats are actually the first ones that aren't complete shit. They are still way Fucking behind their competitors though in terms of quality for the price.

>>56489560
On the wired headphones you plug into the adapter.


Kek.

>>56487305
Indeed we can't change shit taste. All we can do is pity you while we use better products.

>>56485112
With over 80% marektshare there is a great possibility that some of them live in third world countries ;)

>>56486944
>Expensive material?
>No Profit margin?

yeah shure this is some really good plastic coming from a slavery camp in china.

>>56486944
>You're literally retarded. Analog transmission can only deteriorate a signal. That's why digital exists in the first place.
When it comes to transmission it's true.

But you can't expect tiny electronics running on a tiny battery to deliver quality equivalent to real DAC and amp running on a bigger battery. So in this case, analog transmission is preferable to superior digital transmission but shitty DAC.

>>56484359
People will lose them very quickly and start bitching about it on Twitter, and soon will come the Apple AirCable® to tied them together so you won't lose them, before they announce the Apple iPhone Accessory Cable® that ties them to your iPhone case so it's more practical.

Soon people will pay a fortune to buy fucking string that provides zero fucking feature.

I just want to say the design looks fucking horrible.
I expected them to look like earplugs, not this horrible abortion.

>>56484359
iPhone is one of the cheaper "rich" product, everytime you see a celebrity with a phone, it will be an iphone. Apple dont care about progress, they know their baits/traps work well and that poor/middle class people will buy it anyway

They are fucking good at it