1080 vs 480 rx GO

File: image.jpg (53KB, 690x720px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 690x720px

1080 because it's a bigger number, duh

/thread

>>56476469
you stupid

>>56476751
>actually thinking anon is serious
you stupid

>>56476962
thinking that I'm thinking that anon is serious
you stupid

>>56476751
no your stupider

>>56476174
what metrics are we comparing them on?
Performance? 1080.
Price:performance? 480.
Availability? Neither.

>>56476174
Rx 480 isnt a high end card, idk why dumb people keep making this comparison.

What a horrible thread.

>>56478682
so now that the dust is settled OP, who won?

File: 1336288861488.jpg (15KB, 320x272px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 320x272px

>>56478736
you mean these?

>>56478733
me

>>56478861
no, this ones

>>56480672
you mean these?

>>56480699
oh

File: 1471902695957.jpg (71KB, 552x661px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 552x661px

>>56478631
the rx 480 is a great card!

File: passmark.png (44KB, 786x593px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 786x593px

just ran some passmark tests a while ago with my RX 470 and apparently Nvidia GPU's aren't so great at 2D rendering

File: passmark2.png (60KB, 1046x745px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 1046x745px

>>56481528
also RX 470 scored better than the GTX 980 in a few 3D tests also especially DX9, only thing is DX11 where it fails for some reason and ironically that's where all Nvidias benchmarks are cherry picked on DX11