PROgrammation en LOGique

>>56473269
Never actually used but seems like something that's only used in academia (like Haskell)

yes

because it's worthless

>>56475806
Why do you feel it's worthless?

>>56475564
That's probably true, I haven't heard about a successfull project written in it.

>>56476241
Prolog is slow as shit, extremely limited, and everything it does, imperative and functional languages can do better

>>56475564
Haskell is used in lots of enterprise applications you dumb fucking cunt. Look it up, haskell is used everywhere. You're probably using something running haskell right now without even realizing it. So maybe next time check your god damn facts before you open your stupid whore mouth.

It feels backwards.

>>56478339
>getting this mad over a /g/ meme

I only have used it back in my uni days. Mainly for "AI" stuff (inference system). The syntax is one of a kind and the programming style is close to FP. IMO it is a good language but not a good general purpose one.

I have read that the first Erlang implementation was done in prolog so there is at least one successful project having used it.

>>56478339
Fuck off cunt, I used Haskell at uni and liked but never used again because there are few and worse libs than other languages
Your elitist attitude is the reason Haskell will never be a serious language used in enterprise
Also random number generation rely only on Intel special instructions AKA probably backdoored, enjoy your toy language pleb