would you a robot /g/?

>Relationship-free access to snatch offered
>Dildo humping wimmins lib cunt triggered.

Everything seems to be in order here

>>56467677
Yes

Why just sex?
https://youtu.be/j-pF56-ZYkY

>>56467677
What are their arguments?

>ugly woman
>complaining about sex bots
Sounds about right

Cunts know their use is coming to an end

File: images (5).jpg (5KB, 299x168px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 299x168px

>>56467677
IM COMING TO YOUR TOWN

>>56467677
Only if it is as sexy as that cutie on OP's pic.

>>56467677
lol someone make a sex robot with her face

>>56467677
vibrating dildo: OK
female sex doll: SEXIST AS FUCK

oh you women, never cease to entertain

File: 1473083467558.gif (2MB, 300x169px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 300x169px

>>56467677
>technology not even close to being anything more other than a novelty for future tech shows
>women already in damage control mode

>unfuckable woman against elaborate sex toys

Pottery. She shouldn't care, they're not stealing any men that would have went her way anyway. I'd rather fuck a nice car exhaust than her yeasty, sort-of-shaved fupa.

>women aren't sex objects!
>create actual, literal sex objects
>wha-- that's bad too! because reasons!

>>56468224
>unfuckable woman against elaborate sex toys
No, just sex toys for men.

Strap a dick on it and they would buy 20 of them ffs.