All of the distro threads are dumb Autists complaining about

>>56461572
>what is a common thing throughout all distros you think everyone would want to see?
systemd

>>56461572
NixOS or some other container based distro

>>56461582
This, pretty much. Uniformity and stability are what we need across all distros.

>>56461582
That's a given. The most backwards of autists would not have a say. They would want shit like portage and other garbage. Linux should be for progress, lagging behind is for bsd.

>>56461572
>>56461617
Bedrock Linux is the objectively best distro but it doesn't have a 1.0 release yet.

>>56461572
>what would an offical gnu/Linux distro for the whole community look like?

For one thing, the diversity in distros shows that people have different uses for how they want their system to behave.

But I'd imagine the majority of them would want a simple out-of-the-box, stable OS with some nice visual frills. It would probably act like OSX without the weird, custom BSD shit.

Some people actually go out of there way to find normie-deterent distros. So, I don't know if this would be 100% possible.

However, I would expect that >>56461787 is mostly correct.

I feel like the most popular distro would be something highly customizable, but equally noob friendly.

> Load up iso
> Noob or nah? (if noob: Gnome and done)
> Select options (DE / Shell / etc.)
> Select programs (if any)
> Encrypt?
> done.jpg

Honestly, everyone would probably work together easier if free(tm) and open-source was all everyone did.

>>56461572
We must first destroy Ubuntu

>>56461787
>act like OS X
Mac OS has the worst window management of any desktop still in use.

>>56461853
>Gnome
I hope you mean MATE.

I think a universal package manager would move Linux toward a better future.

>>56461904
That's easily replaced. You can even write scripts on top of OSX currently to fix that.
I was talking more of the soft animations and gesture sport. People eat that up.