So like? I don't know what the fuck this " ... " shit means.
can someone please explain to me please
do you mean in programming terms or physical meaning?
>>56445088
Are you fucking retarded? It's just a sequence.
It means you are retatded
>>56445088
good luck OP
>>56445088
google summation
>>56445088
it's the ... operator, it is used for extending sequences past the beginning, it can fit in any sequence that has at least 3 terms as you see in the picture
make sure you don't mix it with the .... operator (that's 4 periods), which is used for linear expansion
>>56445088
If this is confusing it may be time to take more math
variadic argumentssum(2, 4, 6, 8);
>>56445088
please fail your next class, you deserve it.
>>56445129
>Are you fucking retarded?
Honestly im slightly am when it comes to this. But thank you.
Since its a Sequence do I just write
1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 all the way up to the "N" value or wut
>>56445088
go on libgen.io
obtain 'Precalculus' by Sheldon Axler.
go to sequence and series page, read about summation. The Art of Programming, and Algorithms book (by CLRS) 3rd edition both explain the difference between the ... (dot dot dot) notation of sums and the sigma sum notation as well.
>>56445155
w8 + gr8 ... b8
>>56445174
>libgen.io
Fucking Thank you.
>>56445155
In case you're not b8ing, you can't write the sequence until N because you don't know N. Use sigma notation and calculate an expression for the value of the sum or just use a for loop like a true pajeet.
>>56445201
Im honestly not fucking baiting.
My teacher never went over what "..." means.
>>56445155
All that means is it's a sum of cubes to some arbitrary integer N^3 that is greater than 0 so positive. (Note that a sum of cubes always ends up a square).
So could be cubesum(20) or sumcube(23049034930)
Google sum of cubes
https://www.codechef.com/problems/CUBES
Read a precalculus book.
>>56445232
What the fuck is that shit? You should iterate from 1 to n and sum the cubes in some variable, it's not that hard. Also, you should really follow the advices on >>56445174 and >>56445280
>>56445358
I did Thank you very much.
I'm making the improvements as we speak.