Audiophile fags will defend this. https://www.youtube.com/w

File: smug horror.png (121KB, 354x347px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 354x347px

>>56430947
looks like parody

>>56430947
No. No, we won't.
Most real audiophiles are objectivists. We don't sperg on the intertubes because life is too short to bother putting down loud idiots.

I can't decide between Turtle Beaches and Beats, which is better?

>>56432561
my dick

>>56432572
Gotta say, he's right.

>>56430947
Fuck no. Then again I'm no audiophile, but I love my FLAC & 160€ headphones.

>>56430947
I laugh at audiophiles in hpg

File: audiophile.webm (3MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 640x360px

>audiophile

FACKEN LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

File: 437fdc433c1803a934700d5c2cb0b70d.jpg (70KB, 353x500px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 353x500px

Is it considered audiophile if I listen to flac internet radio streams?

>>56434396
Tyll's no audiophile. He's a salesman.

>>56434396
r u fkn srs m8, does he have a problem or something?

>>56434396
kek. I bet he's listening to flac

>>56430947
he is crying because the celestial noises are really hurting his ears

>>56434396
lol, look at him cumming

Hey guys I listen to 30s hot jazz that I find on YouTube.
Am I an audiophile? My rig consists of a sweet Sennheiser hd558 pair

I have seen various discussions about wether people can (and indeed should) be able to detect a difference in quality between flac and wav files.

Well I am absolutely certain I can tell. I don't consider myself the most analytical listener, and I'm not always the best as describing it but the difference for me is marked-and my wife agreed.

Flac is a bit drier, a little sweeter perhaps and I think details better resolved. Wav seems fuller, richer and perhaps a bit more dynamic. Flac maybe a bit 'cleaner' sounding?

>>56434413
Kys dumb faggot

>>56430947
>work in audio industry
>everyone laughs at 'audiophiles'

Truly the most retarded niche you will ever meet.