Audiophile fags will defend this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tTRKFkE32XE
>>56430947
looks like parody
>>56430947
No. No, we won't.
Most real audiophiles are objectivists. We don't sperg on the intertubes because life is too short to bother putting down loud idiots.
I can't decide between Turtle Beaches and Beats, which is better?
>>56432561
my dick
>>56432572
Gotta say, he's right.
>>56430947
Fuck no. Then again I'm no audiophile, but I love my FLAC & 160€ headphones.
>>56430947
I laugh at audiophiles in hpg
>audiophile
FACKEN LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
Is it considered audiophile if I listen to flac internet radio streams?
>>56434396
Tyll's no audiophile. He's a salesman.
>>56434396
r u fkn srs m8, does he have a problem or something?
>>56434396
kek. I bet he's listening to flac
>>56430947
he is crying because the celestial noises are really hurting his ears
>>56434396
lol, look at him cumming
Hey guys I listen to 30s hot jazz that I find on YouTube.
Am I an audiophile? My rig consists of a sweet Sennheiser hd558 pair
I have seen various discussions about wether people can (and indeed should) be able to detect a difference in quality between flac and wav files.
Well I am absolutely certain I can tell. I don't consider myself the most analytical listener, and I'm not always the best as describing it but the difference for me is marked-and my wife agreed.
Flac is a bit drier, a little sweeter perhaps and I think details better resolved. Wav seems fuller, richer and perhaps a bit more dynamic. Flac maybe a bit 'cleaner' sounding?
>>56434413
Kys dumb faggot
>>56430947
>work in audio industry
>everyone laughs at 'audiophiles'
Truly the most retarded niche you will ever meet.