/LGBT/ - Le General *BSD Thread

>>56417214
wtf i love bsd now

Why does BSD attracts cucks so much?

>Use BSD license
Companies steal code, closes it off and tells you to fuck yourself

>BSD User-Developer experience
Literally get hacked by own Project leader :^)

>Placebo security
Un-audited ports, Nothing else runs in BSD without ports

>Compatibility
Some BSD cannot even have non-free codec packs. Not many proprietary software and drivers run on *BSD, specially OpenBSD. Many Realtek and Broadcom devices will never run because of its non-free only drivers.

>NO active development
Except for PC-BSD, there is no live *BSD desktop. OpenBackdoor removed Linux compatibility AND WINE. BSD market share is not rising.

>Less softwares than Linux
Cannot even perform Vt-d virtualization on windows guests. (Good for nothing). Behyve is miles behind KVM/QEMU.

>Community
Non-existent.
Few buttflustered autists that mostly comprise of mactoddlers (OSX is BSD :-DDDDDD).
FreeBSD is actually getting better though. I hope PC-BSD catches on but their primary goal is to fight own BSD counterparts' autistic community.


>Documentation
FreeBSD wiki has a good documentation but lacks contents.


>OpenBSD
OpenBackdoor is specially the meme of BSD community. It;'s a freetard BSD (Not even freetard Linux, that's less autism). No ZFS, no MAC, no jails, no non-free drivers, no non-free codecs, no non-free softwares, no Vt-d virtualization, no Linux compatibility, no WINE, project leader is a hostile autist that never grew out of teenage edge, no security in ports, non-existent community.


I am aware that many people use OpenBSD for nothing more than a router, and for this it indeed ideal. For the use of a router, extended access controls would not provide much benefit. I wrote this argument however because many people seem convinced that OpenBSD has suerior security in all instances and including as a network server or user operating system.

>Ex dev spills the beans and says there are backdoors in the core OpenBSD code base
>Cat's out of the bag
>Get rid of a few "minor bugs" as soon as shit went public
>"Disclose" the "whole" changelog

Why is this allowed?

File: Screenshot from 2016-09-04 16-26-39.png (588KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

588KB, 1366x768px

OpenBSD can't torrent

>>56417377
wtf i hate bsd now

>>56417214

> No Micro$oft Office
> No Adobe Flash

what a fucking rip off!

also, kill yourself idiot ;)

>9 posts
>4 IPs
I hate BSD too (as long as it uses a cuck license), but you're fucking pathetic
Kill yourself stupid nigger

>>56417346

> I wrote this argument...

you mean shitpost

>>56417377

Link to sauce or GTFO

I feel like BSD was dying until all the hobbyist OS's started getting killed. Now it has this annoying crowd of assholes that cling to their "kind of obscure" and not at all necessary Distros.

Just let BSD pull its plug and let it go away peacefully. Stop dragging its lifeless body around. This isn't weekend at bernies.

>>56417561

Netflix much?

>Being this insecure that you need to make threads about BSD and shitpost about it constantly

BSD is fucking gay

>>56417778

this

/thread

>>56417293
Then why does Whatsapp use FreeBSD to run their botnet if it's so insecure?

>>56418237
Because whatsapp doesn't need daily-used packages aka unaudited ports

File: 1465867345732.jpg (419KB, 1200x1000px) Image search: [Google]

419KB, 1200x1000px

>>56417346

>STOP SHILLING BSD REEEE
>proceeds to make anti-BSD shitposting threads

>>56418256
glad to know whatsapp doesn't need a web server

Hey guys I'll post with my trip for a bit here

Why won't PCBSD or FreeBSD or OpenBSD boot on my spare Mac Mini even after I picked the right architecture?

>>56420303
Glad to know you are posting from a web server

>>56420510
???

obviously you don't know that to run a web sever in freebsd, which whatsapp does, requires the ports collection

>>56420481
http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/6.0/macppc/INSTALL.macppc
did you read this?

why are unixes so gay?
bsd - /lgbt/
gnu - /fgt/
os x - nuff said

>>56420835
bsd is normally /baot/

>>56420819
Should've specified, EFI Intel model, not PPC.

>>56422828
Did you burn a CD? I think ISOs don't come with the EFI bootloader by default. Only the USB images do.

Should be a pretty easy fix, if you get the right bootloader and put it inside the .iso image.

>>56422872
Have a look here, too.
https://blog.jasper.la/openbsd-uefi-bootloader-howto/

>>56422872
Same with both a DVD and USB. Even with REFInd/REFIt. I get something saying to pick option 1 or 2, and I can't pick either. If I hold 1 down, while booting, it shows that I pressed it, but doesn't respond.

The only reason why someone would be this rabidly against OpenBSD is that they would prefer that the security advances that are typically pioneered by OpenBSD and then spread to other operating systems not happen.

Just something to think about.

>>56423133
An important distinction should be made here.

Most of what OpenBSD does is not pioneering. What they do is mostly find some sort of idea from somewhere else, they implement it, and force their users to use it. These users then act like lab rats pretty much. It's a pretty good idea.

>>56420844
yeah some guy is mad because people made BSD threads so he started making BSD threads "ironically"

File: stock-photo-humanoid-robot-with-woman-isolated-on-white-with-clipping-path-d-illustration-440931277.jpg (38KB, 429x470px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 429x470px

Why would I want to use BSD when better alternatives like Linux and Plan9 exist?

>>56423500
plan 9 is literally dead

>>56423167
To take an idea and to implement and test it is pioneering. Ideas are simply ideas until this shit happens.