Is there any reason to be against net neutrality?

>>56413922

Money?

>>56413922
Yes.

>>56413922
It puts the internet under the same regulatory jurisdiction as radio and cable for the FCC to fuck up.

>>56413922
>updates on natural disaster situations should have the same packet priority as your pedophile cartoons

>>56413984
Oh, also. While it sits under the guise of keeping companies from charging customer A more than customer B for better service (as if this is a bad thing, but hurr durr muh fairness.) it'll likely cause a lot of carriers to simply have one flat rate service that'll be somewhere between their best and worst options. While this improves the bottom line, it'll be more expensive for poorfags, while being less expensive yet slower than those willing and able to pay for top tier service.

The only thing that's actually good about net neutrality is making it so ISPs can't charge money from places like Netflix for preferred service.

>>56414030
Of course, why should my pedophilia be restricted by low priority?