How is it possible that a whole team of people can't maintain the kernel properly, and have trouble with it because of how hard it is working with it to the point that they rather dismiss most bugs as irrelevant, but also at the same time, this amazingly intricate kernel was created by one man alone? Is he the Tony Stark of computers or something? Why doesn't he maintain the kernel himself? This is why there's so much stuff wrong with the Linux kernel.
Go to bed, dad.
>>56406345
Yeah go post in the video card threads faggot. This one is for actual discussion.
>the linux kernel of 1991 has not changed and has had no other submissions from any other source ever
you can also do this thing called kernel modules and then turn them on later with this absolutely new technology invented last night called DKMS
>>56406340
with popularity comes complexity
with complexity comes a lot of maintenance effort
>>56406340
Who is Alan Cox, Ted t'so, and the many Kerbal patchers then and now? Linux is a product of connectivity and good leadership.
>>56407035
>Kerbal
>bringing up the incomplete development of a shitty game as an example of something (but what?)
The board for that is >>>/v/ newfriend.
>>56406340
read the cathedral and the bazaar you big retard
Linus' source code makes up about 1% of kernel nowadays
>>56406345
muh identity