Post your favorite browser

Ur mom

>>56401751
You're mother

File: Screenshot_1.png (169KB, 1919x1040px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 1919x1040px

>>56401751

Firefox with ublock and grease monkey for aak and appchanx

opera

File: 2016-09-03-094642_1366x768_scrot.png (179KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 1366x768px

qutebrowser

Google Chrome :^)

Chrome, syncing between my devices is great, you should try it senpai.

>>56401751
SeaMonkey a cute!!!!

For real though the list goes:

1. QupZilla
2. Midori
3. Pale Moon
4. Waterfox
5. Cyberfox
6. Chromium
7. Sleipnir
8. Firefox Dev/Aurora
9. Firefox Beta
10. Firefox
11. Chrome Canary
12. Safari
13. Edge
14. Chrome
15. Internet Explorer 6-7-8-9

File: sfgghjlk.png (55KB, 1255x910px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 1255x910px

Nightly

File: Untitled.png (72KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 1920x1080px

Firefox.

File: Screenshot_20160903-132410.png (66KB, 1080x1920px)

66KB, 1080x1920px

This one

>>56401751
What does SeaMonkey offer that other browsers don't?

>>56404851
It's a gtk2 firefox. The gtk3 filepicker is crap.

Also, firefox has gone full sjw and the browser performance is shitty these days. Also, seamonkey is a full internet suite. Look it up

File: Sans titre.png (1MB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1680x1050px

>>56401751
Q U T E B R O W S E R

>>56403033
>Nightly
Is it as laggy as normal Firefox?

>>56403052
how do i make it look like that?

>>56401751
Man SeaMonkey looks good on GTK2.
>>56403017
That's pretty autistic, but you're probably a web dev.

>>56406742
nope im not autistic (had it checked out, because my doctor thought i might be). and i'm not a web dev really. I know a bit of CSS/HTML though... h-hehe... :3

File: serveimage.jpg (352KB, 2457x2940px)

352KB, 2457x2940px

>>56406763
Hi, I'm a doctor, I've just check you up.

The result is : you're definitly autistic

sorry anon

File: screenFetch-2016-09-03_09-50-04.png (1MB, 3840x1080px)

1MB, 3840x1080px

Furryfox

>>56406815
yeah i already saw a autist specialist in real life and he confirmed within 5 minutes i definitely am not autistic

File: Screen Shot 2016-09-03 at 11.56.48 AM.png (442KB, 1792x1139px) Image search: [Google]

442KB, 1792x1139px

Opera 12.16

>>56401751
That looks ugly as fuck, OP. I hope there are performance benefits or something.

* Firefox is best for extensibility/ricing
* Chrome is best for convenience
* Qutebrowser is best for minimalism/efficiency and probably performance

Caveats: Chrome is only convenient if you sell your soul to Google, become part of their ecosystem, and use their services regularly. Otherwise you mind as well go with Firefox. And Qutebrowser has a slight learning curve, but it's totally worth it.

Ultimately all browsers function identically and it's mostly a subjective choice. Arguing over the performance of FF vs Chrome is retarded because most people use many add-ons/extensions which heavily affect performance.

>>56405922
It's the same as Firefox, but it gets updated every day. It may add or remove features. Bad performance in Firefox is usually tied to having many add-ons. Also you may be using the 32-bit version of Firefox, and you could see performance gains if you use the 64-bit version (https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all/)

>>56406936
It's not like he's stuck with it looking that way, that's just how he's got it set up. And there are benefits, it's essentially a continuation of Netscape Communicator.

File: foxy.png (212KB, 1366x728px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 1366x728px

>>56406936
Forgot a picture of my preferred/current browser.

Opera but its ded so chropera

You are my favourite browser

>>56402141
Sexy

Is Palemoon faster and more secure than Firefox?

>>56407135
https://www.palemoon.org/technical.shtml

>>56406878
So you're just a fag then got it

File: wp_ss_20160903_0001.png (677KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

677KB, 1440x2560px

Here you /g/o, using it in continuum as well when no real pc is needed

>>56406936
>Qutebrowser is best for minimalism/efficiency and probably performance

Now that Qutebrowser is running on QtWebEngine it sure is best for performance

How compatible are firefox add-ons with palememe?

File: 1465841186641.jpg (33KB, 600x371px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 600x371px

>>56407266

>>56402141
this
/thread

File: pall-mall-cigarettes.jpg (101KB, 436x650px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 436x650px

>>56407135
what???

File: 1462066498741.png (13KB, 266x220px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 266x220px

those saying qutebrowser:

how do you survive without noscript/adblock/4chanX?

>>56407503
4chanX : I don't use it
adblock : there's an adblock based on a host file , which you can set to auto update
noscript : it's indeed missing

but all the pros > the cons

Palezilla Fire Moon

>>56407553

ehh I dunno... I can survive without 4chanX and my sadpanda scripts but the lack of plugins like https-everywhere and umatrix...

what pros are you refeering to by the way?

>>56407553
I can't even get regular 4chan to work in qutebrowser, the captcha says there was a connection error every time.

I want to use it, but I'm going to wait for it to be more mature

>>56407717
minimalism
fast
low performance footprint
keyboard driven interface (vim like shortcuts)
hints
QTWebEngine

aliases
ex I type :4c and I'm on 4chan, way quicker than using a mouse to click a bookmark.


And more : https://github.com/The-Compiler/qutebrowser/blob/master/FAQ.asciidoc

>>56407738
Weird

Which OS do you use ?

Is Qutebrowser up to date ?

If you can't find a solution post your problem here : https://github.com/The-Compiler/qutebrowser/issues

the dev will quickly answer

File: ss1.png (203KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 1366x768px

>>56401850
>not using native adblocker
Oh man!

File: 2016-09-03-130921_1366x768_scrot.png (143KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 1366x768px

>>56407807
I'm using Arch, qutebrowser is v0.8.2-1. Here's a scrot of what I'm seeing

>>56407872
close all sessions of qutebrowser and try launching it like this :

qutebowser --backend webengine

Is it better ?

>>56407927
I had to install qt5-webengine, but I seem to be able to post with it now.

Can I change the file-choosing dialog? I'm getting a different one than I usually do.

File: selection.png (854KB, 2456x2674px)

854KB, 2456x2674px

Safari is the best browser, desu

>>56408046
kek

>>56408059
What are you kekking about?

>>56408025
of course, use it like you usually do

>>56408070
You claiming one of the worst browsers is even remotely close to the best

>>56408097
What makes it the worst?

>>56408104
No side tabs among the lack of other features, poor addon support, etc.

>>56408112
>No side tabs
I hope you don't mean Firefox or something else embarrassing.

>lack of other features
Such as?

>poor addon support
It has the essentials. There's nothing stopping someone from writing the extension either.

File: firefox vs qutebrowser.png (67KB, 1772x682px)

67KB, 1772x682px

>>56408079
I've never done that before.
Pic related is a comparison, Firefox on left, qutebrowser on right. I'd like to change it to the Firefox one when I use qutebrowser.

>>56408140
>I hope you don't mean Firefox or something else embarrassing.
Anything would be less embarrassing than Safari
>being embarrassed by your choice in browser
top fucking kek

>Such as
Mail client, RSS, Data compression VPN, etc.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Features_of_the_Opera_web_browser
>It has the essentials. There's nothing stopping someone from writing the extension either.
>lol just write them urself
My point exactly.

File: autism-00023.png (961KB, 811x863px) Image search: [Google]

961KB, 811x863px

>>56408195
If I was embarrassed by my choice of browser I wouldn't have posted it and stated the fact it was the best. Pay attention.

>Mail client, RSS, Data compression VPN, etc.
We're talking about web browsers.

>My point exactly.
Then why are you complaining about extension support? You agree.

>>56408192
Neither do I, the window doesn't pop up as I always save my files at the same place

It's using a QT file manager, maybe try to ask how to modify that on :

Github/TheCompiler/Qutebrowser/Issues

CHROOOOME!!

>>56408232
>If I was embarrassed by my choice of browser I wouldn't have posted it and stated the fact it was the best. Pay attention
No fucking shit. I'm saying that being embarrassed by any browser is beyond retarded.
>We're talking about web browsers.
No shit.
>Then why are you complaining about extension support? You agree.
You're a fucking dumbass.

>>56408301
>No fucking shit. I'm saying that being embarrassed by any browser is beyond retarded.
Yet you lash out unprovoked. Seek mental healthcare.

>No shit.
Then why are you talking about VPNs, RSS, file compression and e-mail? Stay on topic.

>You're a fucking dumbass.
If we agree then why are you insulting me? You have emotional issues. Were you abused? I was too.

>>56407738
You can't make threads, but you can enable legacy captcha.
You should only really be using the keyboard with it anyway.

File: Screenshot from 2016-09-03 19-47-47.png (199KB, 1360x768px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 1360x768px

>>56401751
Firefox is my favourite

>>56408348
>Yet you lash out unprovoked. Seek mental healthcare.
What the fuck are you on about?
>Then why are you talking about VPNs, RSS, file compression and e-mail?
Because those are all features Safari lacks.
>Stay on topic
I never strayed from the topic.
>If we agree then why are you insulting me?
Because we don't agree, you goddamned mongoloid.

>>56408386
>What the fuck are you on about?
You started attacking me for saying a fact.

>Because those are all features Safari lacks.
Well yeah, we're talking about web browsers. Why would a web browser compress my SoF collection for me? I have Keka for that.

>I never strayed from the topic.
But you keep bringing up RSS and VPNs and stuff. All I did was post my web browser. wew

>Because we don't agree, you goddamned mongoloid.
I wish. I'm actually white mixed heritage.

>>56408449
>You started attacking me for saying a fact.
I've done no such thing.
>Well yeah, we're talking about web browsers
And how Safari's one of the shittiest.
>But you keep bringing up RSS and VPNs and stuff. All I did was post my web browser. wew
And all I did was post things your browser should support.
>I wish. I'm actually white mixed heritage.
Either way you're a fucking faggot. And clinically retarded.

File: what-0072.jpg (182KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 1920x1080px

>>56408511
>I've done no such thing.
You laughed at me.

>And how Safari's one of the shittiest.
It's not though. You haven't given any reasons, you just shifted the conversation to other programs.

>And all I did was post things your browser should support.
My browser supports that, but we're talking about web browsers. The "web" in web browser is important because it's not the same as the browser which you use to look at files.

>Either way you're a fucking faggot. And clinically retarded.
Now you're insulting my sexuality? What the fuck? I'm trying to be polite with you despite getting really annoyed with the mental gymnastics stuff you're trying to pull. Stop.

>>56408566
>You laughed at me.
>laughing = attacking

>It's not though. You haven't given any reasons
I gave plenty of reasons
>you just shifted the conversation to other programs
No I didn't. this whole time we've been discussing browsers.

>>56408511
not even the anon you're arguing with, but
>one of the shittiest
this is subjective
>And all I did was post things your browser should support.
Why should it? If people want these features then they can install Firefox or something. It's like criticising SumatraPDF for a lack of features when it doesn't intend to include them.

>>56408598
>Why should it? If people want these features then they can install Firefox or something
Exactly. Safari's so unusable you're telling me to stay away and install Firefox yet you're still arguing for it. Why?

>python

dropped

>>56401850
Ads in 4chan sometimes are better than the posts.

>>56408591
Yes, laughing at people hurts their feelings. Not all of us have high self confidence. I thought you said you were abused? Why would you lie about that? Do you know how much suffering it causes me even today?

>I gave plenty of reasons
>No I didn't. this whole time we've been discussing browsers.
Safari isn't Finder. Finder is the browser, Safari is the web browser. This is a web browser thread. I don't understand the miscommunication here.

Do you support Donald Trump? You seem like you're an alt-righter. I'm not even a liberal or SJW or whatever, but you've been incredibly hurtful and offensive because of my choices. I don't appreciate that.

>>56408628
The backend is C++.

>>56408617
It's not unusable, it functions as a web browser for the 99% of people that don't use RSS etc. so there isn't much reason to include these features. I'm not saying stay away from it, use it if you like.

>>56408658
>Not all of us have high self confidence
You're on the wrong website then.
>I thought you said you were abused?
I never said I was abused, you just asked that out of nowhere. And yet you're asking me to stay on topic. kek
>Do you support Donald Trump?
Fuck no.
>You seem like you're an alt-righter
Fuck no.
>you've been incredibly hurtful and offensive because of my choices. I don't appreciate that.
I don't give a shit.

>>56408672
never mind, it actually does support RSS

"the newest versions of Safari for OS X have an RSS subscription feature built directly into the web browser"

http://osxdaily.com/2014/11/03/subscribe-rss-feeds-safari-os-x/

>>56408702
>You're on the wrong website then.
4chan used to be more progressive and left wing before you people showed up. I've been here since 2006, I don't want to leave.

>I never said I was abused, you just asked that out of nowhere. And yet you're asking me to stay on topic. kek
Then why do you have emotional issues? Why are you attacking people online for having preferences you don't agree with? I don't understand.

>Fuck no.
Then why the bigotry and homophobia? When all I did was post a picture and state a fact?

>I don't give a shit.
Some day you might make someone kill themselves by being so mean. Consider how the other person feels some time.

>>56408806
>begs me to stay on topic when I never strayed from the topic
>whole post is off topic
You're a dumbass.

File: nope-00038.jpg (84KB, 768x1024px)

84KB, 768x1024px

>>56408853
You're the hardest person I've ever tried posting with on 4chan. You don't get.
I tried being polite, but you're an asshole. I'm going back to /r9k/. Fuck you egg sucker.

>>56408982
>I'm going back to /r9k/
Good, stay there.

>>56401751
Qutebrowser is the only answer.

>>56401751
qutebrowser

posted from my qutebrowser

>>56409077
indeed

i'm pleased to see it being adopted by the /g/ community

>>56407825
>unironically using W10 on /g/

>>56406936
>That looks ugly as fuck, OP
I actually think it looks pretty good. You are probably complaining about my gtk+ theme anyway.

>>56407266
IDK, but some popular addons work with seamonkey

>>56408372
Gotta link to that theme? Or is it custom?

>>56407266
majority if you stay updated

firefox aka the only browser worth using

Naked Browser Pro on Android

File: Screenshot_20160903-172927.png (178KB, 1080x1920px)

178KB, 1080x1920px

>>56413361

safari

>>56407825
That piece of shit doesn't work. Didn't even block YouTube. I downloaded it for the native blocker feature and the fact you can pop out videos... For YouTube only, I think... It's trash. Uninstalled instantly.

nightly because i got fucked over with the last FF update (unsigned addons)

>>56406021
Doubt you are still here Anon, but just in case anyone else wants to make their browser sexy, I use Stylish, Greasemonkey (for 4chanx n' shit) and the style for the browser is from http ://userstyles.org/styles/123572/ultra-minimal-firefox.

>>56406977
What do you mean opera's dead?

>>56402141
How are you theming pages on qutebrowser?

>>56417529
theming pages ?

What browser should I use for 1080p 60fps youtube videos?
my pc gets 30 degrees hotter with double the framerate, on chrome