Why tho
>>56393601
money
Steve Jobs wouldn't approve this.
>>56393601
apple: "it's innovation"
sheeps: FUCK YEAHHHXXDDD APPLE DA BEST HEHE XD"
>>56393601
To sell those Beats by Dr.Jobs
>>56393740
this
Matches the length of its owners' dicks. That's why.
REVOLUTIONARY DESGIN!
THIS
CHANGES
EVERYTHING!!!
>>56393601
is that cum?
>>56393956
>filename
Because fuck you, that's why.
>>56393601
for people too dumb to not be using BT car audio/personal headphones in 20 fucking 16
GNOME dev here. Can't say I agree with "beats all other GUI efforts in all of computing" - I still think webOS beats us in usability, and if it weren't for how far it fell, I wouldn't mind doing a mobile version of the DE :-D I'm glad people like GNOME, though - it may seem organized on the outside, but internally it plays out more like a fan project or something.
More to the point, however, I feel there's a bit of truth to this post. There's no real reason to use Linux other than "you like it" - sure, there are good aspects to it, but when it comes to OSes, there's no reason to use one over the other. We promote FOSS development because we believe in the philosophies behind it; however, imo it shouldn't be a dealbreaker when talking about software. I got to meet RMS a few years back, and while I appreciate his enthusiasm, I don't agree with him on this point.
HOWEVER, if there is a reason to use Linux, it's the headerbar concept. If you're not familiar with this, its a combined titlebar and menubar that GNOME uses on most of its core apps. It saves space for the actual content of the app to use and forces devs to focus on the core important pieces of their application when designing an interface. It's been copied in so many other OSes, but I feel only Linux users get the true, primal headerbar experience.
There's a user on DeviantArt I follow who does nothing but headerbar concept art, and I can say with certainty it truly shows the power of this amazing technology and its impact on society as a whole. We can do a lot with headerbars, and if we use them correctly, they can do a lot for us. too.
Why, my disabled wife wouldn't be able to use the computer to post her fanart if it wasn't for the simplified design of the GNOME Web browser, Epiphany. She's always found Chrome and Firefox's interfaces to be too unyieldy to use as a onehanded woman.
I hope I've done some good here, and please try GNOME!
>>56394393
Why would you use BT in a car? USB drive with all your stuff plus the car should display cover art all that too (tags).
>>56393956
That fucking file name
10/10
>>56394436
please don't, this isn't a good pasta
>>56394511
>2016
>Still using USB drives
Honestly my car is '05 and only has auxillary input, but I CBA to buy a new faceplate and I like it when shit breaks and I get to fix it.
>dat poorfag engineer lifestyle
>>56394436
>GNOME dev here. [...] I still think webOS beats us in usability
>Gnome
>usability
Look at the rope and hang yourself. That's is fucking usability.
Jfk gnome dev really think of doing a nice job.
>>56394436
I can't laugh at this, t.bh
>>56394629
I bought a 04' Avalon for one of my kids and put in a double din stereo with BT/USB/HFC. It was $100. 128GB USB 60GB of music 10k songs with cover art all id3 tag info displayed.
No BT battery drain is best.
>>56394700
I will say though I do have QC 2.0 chargers in all the cars so it would matter little since all phones are QC2.0 or newer.
>>56393601
it just werks
I'm still waiting for cheap 10gigE for the home.
>steve jobs was killed for resisting this 'innovation'
>>56393601
wtf why is that shitbolt connector bent as fuck
>>56393740
>hehe xd
>>56393956
Where is the conversion being done? Or can Lightning output analog audio?
STEVE JOBS IS ROLLING OVER IN HIS GRAVE
FUCK
YOU
APPLE
FUCK
YOU
FUCK YOU
GIVE ME ME 3.5 JACK
FUCK YOU
FUCK YOU
>>56394063
it's called rain. get out more
>>56396473
Look at the size of the sleeve on the lightning connector.
The DAC is in there.
>>56396565
It looks normal to me, but that's some tiny circuitry if true.
>>56396487
You're going to look pretty stupid (even more so than now) when the next iPhone has a 3.5 jack, aren't you?
You're basing your whole nerd-rage on a rumor that has not been verified. You want it to be true so much.
>>56396628
IM GOING TO BE PRETTY FUCKIN HAPPY IF IT HAS A 3.5 JACK SENPAI
There's something very wrong with that Lightning connector on that adapter, very wrong indeed. It looks like it's inside a sleeve and not protruding directly from the ABS material.
That shit is just borked man.
>>56396595
Lightning connectors already have a circuit board inside them.
>>56396565
fuck man, I wonder if the audio quality will take a hit. I'm mostly worried about the amplifier, not so much the dac
>>56396473
>can Lightning output analog audio?
Nope.
USB 3 can though.
>>56393740
>"""""""""""""""""""Innovation"""""""""""""""""""
I would honestly praise apple if they switched to 2.5mm jack instead.
>>56396731
It would have to be a special IC with lightning, DAC and amplifier on it.
>>56393956
DELET THIS
>applel
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/7467560
>>56393956
Applefags WILL FUCKING DEFEND THIS SHIT.
>>56396917
Switching to 2.5 makes less sense than getting rid of it entirely.
"Look, we switched to another jack that basically no one uses and offers no benefits!"
>>56394700
Which stereo? 100 sounds bretty good
iPhones are LITERALLY for fags. This adapter is to give the iPhone a "cock dangling" look when people go to gay nightclubs.
>>56397180
You must go to some pretty niche nightclubs, anon.
>>56394393
>in 20 fucking 16
>>56396628
There's no fucking way it'll have it.
>>56393601
well, this is a whole new level of cancer.
>>56397497
>trusting macrumors
kek, found the apple fag.
>>56393956
Absolutely kekd
>>56396669
Wtf I hate Trump now