GitHub depression

>>56393370
Ye, pretend it doesn't exist so those autistic mentally ill people don't get free recognition from Jewish media.

>>56393370
can we train a neural net to do the opposite and generate pull requests all over github?

>>56393370
Yes, stop paying attention to it.
Stop talking about it.
It's unimportant.
sage.

  1:5-1:14   warning  `boogeyman` may be insensitive, use `boogey` instead                       boogeyman-boogeywoman
  1:42-1:48  warning  `master` / `slaves` may be insensitive, use `primary` / `replica` instead  master-slave
  2:52-2:54  warning  `he` may be insensitive, use `they`, `it` instead                          he-she
  2:61-2:68  warning  `cripple` may be insensitive, use `person with a limp` instead             cripple

This is hilarious.

>>56393370
>whether your own or someone else's writing...
This is painful to read.

>>56393370
My girlfriend and I refer to each other as master, mistress and slave. It's part of our personal culture and sexual freedom.

Alex is oppressing us, it's a bigoted project that aims to diminish our identities and make us fit into their social mold. Down with the feminarchy!


Now watch as the feminazis explode after reading this paradox.

>>56393370
>implying primary is a term related to replica
>implying primary/replica is a 1:1 synonym for master/slave
>implying every cripple has a limp
21st century holocaust when?

File: 944406.png (252KB, 400x398px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 400x398px

>>56393370
What is this?

You have to be super-careful around white women, faggots and niggers because they aren't as mentally or emotionally strong as master race white men.

Yeah it's a little annoying but it's a lot less annoying than having them running their mouth complaining. It's like being married to a woman, a little annoying amount of give can really pay off if it keeps her fucking mouth shut.

my name is alex you will refer to me as "he" not "they"

>>56393548
what did they mean with this?

>>56393453
>warning `cripple` may be insensitive, use `person with a limp` instead
Yeah man. Instead of calling us what we are, why don't you remind us of the body parts we lack by insinuating that we HAVE something?
Fucking douche.

>>56393431
I wrote a bot that randomly looks through newly posted repos and checks if the word "code of conduct" shows up anywhere.
It usually doesn't, and so I have the bot send an automated pull request with the "contributor covenant" generic CoC, and check again in a week.
If they reject it, I send an automated complaint to github for sexually harassing me.

Woah woah woah! "Moving fast?" what about the disabled who might move slow?!

https://twitter.com/wooorm/status/720321116175085568

File: 1465831684865.jpg (7KB, 300x294px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 300x294px

>>56393370
>learning C# because why not
>doing this for a couple of weeks
>decide to do some projects on it
>go to GitHub to see some projects
>Pokemon GO bot
>Pokemon GO bot
>Pokemon GO bot
>Pokemon GO bot
>some bullshit by Microsoft
>Pokemon GO bot
>Pokemon GO bot
>mfw

File: 1413183383219.gif (29KB, 482x800px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 482x800px

>Be careful with american, it’s profane in some cases

File: thomas_the_triggered_tank_engine.png (116KB, 320x371px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 320x371px

>mom may be insensitive, use parent instead
>dad may be insensitive, use parent instead
>son may be insensitive, use child instead
>daughter may be insensitive, use child instead
>brother may be insensitive, use sibling instead
>sister may be insensitive, use sibling instead

It's not like you have to use it.

>>56393539
t. Socially stunted autist

>master / slave != primary / replica

I've always used parent / child, but some SJW told me that was triggering to orphans or people with bad childhoods. No joke.

It's not about being sensitive or having respect, it's about controlling others.

File: rms.jpg (285KB, 759x1848px) Image search: [Google]

285KB, 759x1848px

I'm going to tell Stallman about it so he can get his personal blog LGBTQXYZ-certificted.

>>56393585
good job anon

>>56393585
Why

>>56393539
>mentally or emotionally strong as master race white men

Most SJWs are straight white men with a lot of self hatred.

>>56393431
Do it.

>>56393982
ill make the logo

>>56393823
wait, how the fuck is UK profane?

>>56393453
Nvidia really person with a limped the perforpersonce of their 7xx series cards, didn't they?

>>56393370
this shit makes me rage evry tiem.
https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/pull/3507

>>56394035
Nationalities are always profane.

If the script comes across "The United States of America" it immediately notifies the appropriate authorities so you can get the help you need. Uttering the most profane of nationalities is forgivable only through reeducation.

>>56393585
suck a dick faggot

>>56394035
TRIGGER WARNING: BREXIT

https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/pull/3507/files

for

>>56394227
https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/pull/3507/files

for fucks sake...

>>56393370
Why do you sensitive, retarded faggots need to GitHub?. Computing is already fucked.

>>56394227
why.

>>56394227
>>56394243
> this is not a joke repository
> this is the official .net compiler

>>56393539
>being white is the only thing he has to be proud of, meanwhile these people actually make something that people use (whether it should be used or not is irrelevant)

I bet you BTFO feminists on twitter all day while mommy cooks your tendies, right?

File: Screenshot_20160902-215822.png (153KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 1440x2560px

Welp.

>>56394227
>I have a counterproposal, for the sake of clarity and better representation for ethnic minorities. Rename whitelist to 'supremepalegoodgoys' and blacklist to 'untermenchafrosemitics'. Will any of the people with commit bits back this proposal ?

>>56394315
kek, Can someone please create a new issue based on this?

>>56394315
im surprised it didnt complain about "white"

File: Screenshot from 2016-09-02 22:10:09.png (24KB, 409x248px)

24KB, 409x248px

>>56393370
What is this SJW bullshit, there's nothing wrong with what I wrote.

Software shouldn't guess gender
https://github.com/nlp-compromise/nlp_compromise/issues/117

File: Screenshot from 2016-09-02 22:12:51.png (6KB, 770x251px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 770x251px

ok

>>56394035
how is it not?

>>>/pol/

take your edgy opinions back to your containment board

>>56393535
Why do they always look weird?

>>56394497
Please just fucking end me. How do you actually get this fucking mad about a computer calling you by a different pronoun than what you have concocted yourself to be that millisecond? This is the internet at its worst.

>>56393370
duh there is. ignore it. it'll never get traction outside of the contributors themselves, who likely all contribute to the same dozen or so social justice type projects

File: ss (2016-09-02 at 10.29.22).png (64KB, 982x800px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 982x800px

>catch insensitive writing
>Mein Kampf is not considered insensitive

good to know

>>56394497
>I feel offended by the algorithm.
urge to kill rising

File: 20160522_184654.jpg (2MB, 2160x2160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2160x2160px

>>56394792
I would love to see them try and catch these cases though...

"This text seems to resemble the writings of Adolf Hitler too much. Please reconsider."

>>56393370
WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS SHIT IT LITERALLY JUST REPLACES GENDER PRONOUNCES

>>56393370
To put it simply, it's the jews. Get redpilled

>>56394301
They should create a separate branch for that insanity so us normal people can still code like a normal person

>>56393539
this has to be a bait

File: 22920631.jpg (100KB, 460x300px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 460x300px

>>56393370
Another thing I just noticed about this page that bugs me: the sample sentence is "we confirmed his identity". In this context, using the 'his' pronoun is not at all problematic, because the sentence literally concerns knowledge about the man's identity. These cucks will force their inane narrative even when usage of a gendered pronoun is completely fucking appropriate.

>>56393539
Error line 3:
reconsider using "her", it might be profane

>>56395140
It is, because pussy white men are the ones who complain about "he/they" and "don't say bad things about nigger xirls"

>>56393370
Using their instead of his is grammatically incorrect. Their should only refer to more than one person. If I ever come into contact with the people that made this I will torture them beyond belief before ending their lives, and it will be justified.

I'm just hoping that the SJWs leave AI alone so we can have something that resembles a normal human

File: heresy.jpg (29KB, 402x564px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 402x564px

>>56393535
Is this how theirs skull looks like?

>>56395280
>Using their instead of his is grammatically incorrect.
Wrong.

Singular they is found in the writings of many respected authors, dating back almost 250 years.

"If a person is born of a ... gloomy temper ... they cannot help it."— Chesterfield, Letter to his son (1759)

>>56394550
>>>/oven/
take your faggotry to the ground.

>>56395315
"John lost his bicycle"
"John lost their bicycle"
The sentence makes sense but the context goes down the drain

>>56395355
John might be a robot without a gender.
When the gender is unknown, singular they and their is a perfectly fine and correct part of the English language.
It has nothing to do with social justice.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singular_they

>>56395376
Using their implies John had lost a bicycle that does not belong to him

On another note I did not once mention anything about social justice

>>56395376
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singular_they
It's even older. First documented use, on this page at least, in 1483.
The /pol/boy got triggered for no reason, yet again.

>>56395355
Maybe John identifies as female, shitlord

>>56395415
I think you forgot that multiple person can reply to a single post

>>56393535
I guarantee that this man has never had sex.

>>56395448
>dodges the question
>bashes the unimportant points

Yeah you're a SJW alright

>>56395471
>Using their instead of his is grammatically incorrect.
In any case, this statement is factually wrong:
>>56395280
>Using their instead of his is grammatically incorrect.
Ask any English teacher and THEY will confirm it.

>>56393620
this is what you gett for not learning a useful language like C

>>56395487
I think you missed
>>56395355
>>56395414
The context is not preserved

Any of you fags gonna do >>56394357 ?

File: holdbreath.jpg (31KB, 430x430px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 430x430px

>>56393504
feminists on /g/...

>>56395448
Who the fuck cares what John identifies as? His parents don't care, his doctors don't care. The only person who cares were his friends, but he lost them all by being a FREAK

>>56393535
He looks like a faggot feminist version of jude law

>>56395280
"they" can refer to a single person, but only in specific contexts.

sjw retards try to use it in every context and it sounds retarded as fuck.

>is there any way to stop this shit?
Yes, ignore them. Being ignored is the worst punishment for an attention whore.

File: asd.png (30KB, 884x522px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 884x522px

Surprisingly politically correct for a song from the early 2000's

>>56395945
>Fear
>profane
wat

>>56395986
> That girl learned to FEAR my cock when I raped her
It can be profane and a trigger

>>56393697
>sibling might be insensitive, use proxy instead

>>56395280
their is used in objective infinitive cases but it most logically a case for errant behavior, as in they've been appointed a label and dealt with. They are no longer a problem. It refers on the most obsequious terms but addles only the possibility and mispronounces no juncture to be lacking unobviously.

Yeah, fuck you too

>>56393453
I'm not a fucking they let alone an "it"
thats pretty insensitive to people

>>56396043
everything can be profane.
>that girl learned to HONOR my cock when I raped her
See?

>>56393585
Kek

>>56394243
Do these people even sleep?

It's grammatically incorrect to use what is known as a "singular their" and should be replaced with his/her/demihis/demiher/other76gendercancerhere

>>56393370
THEY IS NOT A GRAMMATICALLY CORRECT SUBSTITUTE FOR HE REEEEEEEEE

>>56394301
> .net
> not a joke

>>56396877
did you know that any actual linguist is completely fine with it? that's because they know that languages evolve and shit, and it's perfectly fine

>>56393453
>`master` / `slaves` may be insensitive, use `primary` / `replica`
This causes me physical pain. That's not even an approximately equivalent substitute.

>>56393370
>race related

fuck this race baiting shit

>>56393453
Does this thing recognize context before offering suggestions?

>Oh man, my person with a limping arthritis makes living so hard

>>56395315
>Letter to his son
i.e. an informal piece

File: comedy gold.gif (561KB, 240x180px) Image search: [Google]

561KB, 240x180px

>>56394454
It's so fun to watch how they always create the unequality they try to fight themselves

>>56393813
parent/child implies that the parent has spawned the child or has ownership of the child, which is not always the case. Consider IDE's implementation of master/slave.

>`boogeyman` may be insensitive, use `boogey` instead

It's bogeyman. How about learning to spell before worrying about misgendering imaginary monsters?

>>56397183
Language evolves, but that doesn't mean every trend that comes along will ultimately end up being integrated. In this case, demanding people use singular they for political reasons is weird and controversial enough that I doubt it will survive the SocJus era.

>>56393453
>boogeyman is more insensitive than boogey
Don't they both refer to something bad? Do we not want to offend evil spirits?
>"oh fugg watch out for the boogeyman"
>"uh excuse me? Why are you assuming my pronouns?"
>"sorry didn't mean to offend you, xir"

>master = primary
Yeah, that'll definitely work when talking about data communications where you can have multiple masters.

>slave = replica
Again, in any data communication, that wouldn't make any sense. It's fine if you're talking about some device being a slave to another or something like that, but not if the slave is just relaying information or have multiple devices that require different values.

>he = they, it
I don't know what they were thinking when they made this. You read that sentence and you think I'm talking about a group. If I said it, you wouldn't know if I was talking about a person.

>cripple = person with a limp
>"because of his injuries, it is now a person with a limp" implies he can still walk. "because of his injuries, he is now a cripple" implies he can't fucking walk. Also, cripple extends to all limbs, not just legs (I've only seen it used in video games though).

Is there a list of more of this shit?

File: dream.png (152KB, 864x764px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 864x764px

>>56394315

File: Screen Shot 2016-09-02 at 7.23.10 PM.png (36KB, 572x394px)

36KB, 572x394px

>>56394093

File: wpw.png (25KB, 746x547px)

25KB, 746x547px

>>56397768

>>56397502
Boogeyman is proper American English, get with it eurofag

>>56393370

someone load the entirety of stallman.org through there and send the suggestions to his email

>>56394039
Hahahahaha

>>56396043
>She overcame her fear of heights
Why must you pick a worst/edge case scenario to demonstrate your point? The language does not revolve around one stereo individual that may be triggered upon hearing one word

>>56393370
2016
Still using github
Based kek

File: adndpronouns.png (36KB, 739x195px)

36KB, 739x195px

>2016
>not using gitlab

>>56393585
Holy shit I think I'm in love

>70 years into the future, robotics have improved to the point were all humans will occupy a cyborg body that is gender and race neutral. Your brain and thoughts will still be your own because science has not yet developed a brain like system to replace it. There will be no racism or sexism because everyone will have the same asexual, androgynous body. You will not be required to undertake the burden of coitus unless selected for breeding programs. The central committee will control all messaging to the world. You will not have any personal opinion or agenda. You will work the required hours and purchase the required items to maintain order in the global economy. Group think is encouraged, thought crimes are eradicated before anyone else even knows but the central committee will know because it will have access to your personal information and be able to control your body remotely should it need to. You will be assigned an appropriate, sustainable hobby that doesn't distract you from your employment and does not foster and feelings of prejudice or anger to anything else in existence. You will not be allowed to chose the colour of anything and your cyborg body will be a light tan colour as will everyone else in the world to prevent discrimination. You will never be able to die, even if you wish because that will be an illegal command and your CPU will inform the central committee of this desire. You will be referred to an educational facility for recalibration. Welcome to the endgame of technology.

See you there /g/!

>>56396944

Actually it is; Shakespeare even used singular they. That said, it is an unnecessary substitution given the context. If we know an individual's identity, we also know their gender. Therefore, we needn't use a term typically used with individuals of unknown gender.

>>56400448
>Actually it is;
no its not.
singular they can be used in SOME cases, but its not a complete substitute for he.

>>56400408
>implying you can't tell if someone is a nigger from the way he writes online
If it were just about the skin color racism wouldn't exist.

>>56394035
"uk" pronounced uhkh is and expression of disgust or petty anyance.
its like a disgusted sigh.

>>56394039
kek

>>56394227
>>56394301

Actually the commit discussion banter is top
https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/pull/3507

Would you add a CoC to your projects if the code of conduct was something like this? I've got a few drafts of a Don't Be A Dick CoC and I'm always trying to rewrite from scratch to figure out a best version.

>As contributors to this project, we're here to work on the project. Let's try to focus on that and keep personal politics put of things.
>However we are all human and the code we write is informed by our individual and varied backgrounds and maybe something you disagree with will find its way in. Try to respect other people of all walks of life and their contributions.
>if you find yourself in disagreement with something and feel the need to, open up discussion about it and we as a group can talk it out.
>Ultimately those in charge of this project have the final say as it is their decision to make and they will make it from as informed a standpoint as they can.
>In summary: don't be a dick.

File: 1406152127347.jpg (269KB, 1183x800px)

269KB, 1183x800px

>>56401806
>I don't care about your personal life, problems, special psychological fairytale triggers, skin color, appearance, age, or gender.
>I care that you can code, and well.
>Either contribute well reasoned code or get out.

Faceless meritocracy needs to be enforced.

>>56401876
Edgy.

>>56401806
>CoC

I chuckle because it always reminds me of Corruption of Champions.

>>56401806
>dont be a dick
TRIGGERED

File: wooorm.png (6KB, 155x128px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 155x128px

hi

>>56394035
>anglos not disgusting
nice try

File: Untitled.png (671KB, 779x819px)

671KB, 779x819px

>>56401876
>Faceless meritocracy needs to be enforced.
Too bad we live in a liberal bizarro world now.

>>56394854
well that would suppose that their code can understand what you are writing: it would be at least impressive

Also
>inb4 their code is a big if else statement

>>56393453
>person with a limp
holy shit

>>56400448
SJW are not shakespeare

>>56402429
hi, wachu doin tonigh bby? ;)

>>56393535
>Titus Wormer
>Titus
He must be freaking ashamed of his name... o-ops, meant "they" "their"

someone fork it and negate the suggestions

>>56402666
literally the name of a despotic bloodthirsty roman emperor. I would be proud

File: sjwhub.png (63KB, 800x665px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 800x665px

new github logo

>>56402642
>the article
Wew

>>56393370
>gender favouring
>polarising
>race related
>religion inconsiderate
One of those is not like the other.
I'm not a SJW but I can see the point on the others, but religion is not equal and you are all dipshits if you don't think religion is pure ideology. So it's okay to discriminate against Stalinists, but not against people who worship a literal child rapist? That's common morality for you.

But either way
>the lord's year 2016
>github

>>56394550
>If you're not a middle class racist white dude who's afraid of calling a black man anything but "my dear friend and equal of african descent ha ha haaaa" and actually become frustrated when such pompous white assholes insinuate that you are an edgy neo-nazi for not acting like you're afraid of being outed as a racist, you are an edgy neo-nazi

seriously

these "people" are all white, all male, and all self-hating racists. they are not concerned with the well being of others. they are concerned with pretending that their unhindered racism doesn't exist by trying to get rid of everything that reminds them of it.

>>56402707
Umh, nope, it actually was "Tito".
Still, sounds like shit

>>56402771
>Umh, nope, it actually was "Tito"
that's the Ablative case. Nominative case: titus. it's latin. all name we have today coming form the latin are in ablative

>>56393453
>`he` may be insensitive, use `they`, `it` instead

What does it say when you use "she"?

>>56399920
>based Gygax

File: alexjswat.png (25KB, 812x461px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 812x461px

I think I broke it somehow.

>Actually it seems discriminating to "allow", "block", or "ignore" anything

Based @casper

File: aged_wb20150419030047131667.jpg (26KB, 361x361px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 361x361px

>>56393370
>>56393453
>>56394227
>>56394243
I just can't

>>56393620
the pokemon go api is in C#

File: no issues.png (12KB, 749x291px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 749x291px

There's an easy solution for this mess: don't write in English.

>>56403281
Continuing on this idea, perhaps we could all start writing everything in German? Then you assign a gender to *everything*, leading to the complete destruction of the whole SJW collective.

>>56393620
Create your own instead of whinging?