What's the best browser? v2.0

>>56368193
fug off

>>56368122
>separate Opera and Chropera options
For once OP is not a fag

File: J3Q4MNs (1).jpg (78KB, 667x1000px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 667x1000px

>>56368594
:)

>>56368122
>not salam browser
Fucking infidels, when will they learn
Enjoy your eternal torment, I'll be over here enjoying my 72 virgins

File: islam_means____by_nayzak-d4jx56f.jpg (437KB, 1000x1500px) Image search: [Google]

437KB, 1000x1500px

>>56369531

>>56369689
Oh my allah... I would love to haram her if you know what I mean ;)

File: my_happiness_is____by_nayzak-d54nc9y.jpg (269KB, 1024x1188px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 1024x1188px

>>56369698

>more votes for Chrome than for Chromium

Just, why?

>>56369867
Once you're part of the botnet, you are forever part of the botnet shilling society.

>google ultron is not first
So op IS a faggot

Holy fuck there are so many shitty meme browsers

>>56369947
Yes, because OP is totally at fault here.

>>56369951
Well, it's because /g/ is autistic and expects to see its browser there. :)

qutebrowser is not text based at all
Its keyboard based but it has qt gui, thats the whole point

File: estutmirleid.gif (949KB, 500x283px) Image search: [Google]

949KB, 500x283px

>>56370000
I'm sorry...

>>56370026
its okay, i forgive you

File: danke.png (446KB, 1123x633px) Image search: [Google]

446KB, 1123x633px

>>56370044

File: why.png (2KB, 494x61px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 494x61px

why?

Bumperino.

File: rikkaaaa.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>56370068
this thread is now a waifu thread

File: hello-kinmoza-episode-1-karen-sparkling-eyes.png (441KB, 1048x587px) Image search: [Google]

441KB, 1048x587px

>>56371303
Okay. :)

I want something similar to chrome, and not shit. Need good cross-platform interaction, any ideas?

>>56373257
Chropera is a bit better than Chrome.
Plus, it's cross-platform.

Vivaldi's better that Chropera, but it doesn't have a mobile app yet.

>>56373257
You can also just use Chrome's alternative: Firefox.

File: 1466655146987.jpg (16KB, 185x243px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 185x243px

>Chrome in second place

File: Soon.png (6KB, 476x118px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 476x118px

>>56373474
Not for long, though.

>>56368122
>qutebrowser
>text based

>>56373959
See >>56370026

God tier: Firefox
Top tier: Other open source browsers
Shady tier: Chromium
Shit tier: Any closed source browser

>>56374179
Pretty much, yeah.

>>56374179
Sjw tier firefox

>>56374667
>I let my retarded political opinions influence my browser choice
>>>/pol/

>>56374667
http://betanews.com/2015/03/16/mozilla-approves-nazi-themed-anti-feminism-firefox-extension/

I don't understand how many people are able to stand how slow Firefox is. Is it because many of you never tried any other browsers so you aren't even aware how shit Firefox is?

File: 1472704554679.gif (731KB, 200x202px) Image search: [Google]

731KB, 200x202px

>>56368122
Firefox.

They might be SJW but their politics don't affect my browsing experience.

>>56375283
It's because it may be slow but it's still the best up to date browser family

>>56375308
How do you figure? Opera, which has like 35 employees compared to Mozilla's 300, is a faster and smoother browser.

>>56375351
Muh speed is a bullshit meme. It's a fucking browser, it either renders a webpage or it doesn't. Other than that what matters is features, and ever since Opera died Firefox has been taking the cake.

>>56375372
I'm sorry, I see no reason to use a less responsive and laggier browser. Opera did what it had to do and you see that Firefox is doing the exact same thing, it's just a matter of time until it becomes Chromefox. Chromium is simply superior. Now, if Eich was still in charge, I would have more faith in Firefox.

File: 1456740776958.png (812KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

812KB, 600x600px

>>56375424
>I'm sorry, I see no reason to use a less responsive and laggier browser
Well I guess if you're a masochist you make shitty choices like that.
>Opera did what it had to do
You mean Opera had to kill the greatest browser man had ever conceived? I disagree. I disagree that Firefox needs to do the same thing as well. They may be going that route but by no means do they need to.
>Chromium is simply superior
pic related

>>56375424
Too bad his browser, Brave, is absolute shit.

File: 1386397079897.jpg (188KB, 846x476px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 846x476px

>>56368122
Chromium

>>56368122
Why do you have qutebrowser listed under text-based? (I accidentally voted for OTHER before I saw it)

That's severely miscategorized, qutebrowser is a GUI browser. (Functionally pretty similar to pentadactyl)

>>56375486
Currently it is, because it's mid development, but even at this point it's faster than mainstream browser. It just needs more polish and it will be good.

>>56375485
Good thing people are actually pragmatic and choose the browser that's the most comfortable to use instead of feigning loyalty to something that died long ago. Opera made the right choice, by now their browser would've have been as shitty as Firefox is now.

>>56375550
>browser that's the most comfortable
But that'd be Presto Opera and Firefox.

File: tutmirleid.jpg (57KB, 736x552px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 736x552px

>>56375502
I apologize a lot. I was trying to condense the poll options to fit the strawpoll limit (and to add a few extra memebrowsers), regrettably I put it in there without rechecking the type of browser it is.

>>56375587
Oh Firefox's market share figures and trends certainly support your statement.

>>56375667
>the market share argument
Oh I see, you're just retarded.

>>56375587
How is Chrome not comfy?

>>56376007
No side tabs, looks like ass, feature lacking.

File: qutebrowser.png (160KB, 2046x2126px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 2046x2126px

>>56376018
>browser developed by a multi-billion dollar global megacorporation
>has no tabs-on-sides

>browser developed by some autistic guy in his spare time
>has tabs-on-sides

How can Google be this incompetent?

>>56375297
I'm happy for you. :)

>>56368122
I loved Firefox for years but lately I've been using Chromium and/or Opera. Shame that Firefox is dying.

>>56377018
RIP FoxyBrowser

>>56376047
dont you know? having features would confuse the normies

>>56377617
Yeah, that's why we paint our cars red - so they go faster! Psshh, who needs a better engine.

>>56376341
O boi

>>56369867
Because theres no practical difference between thw two. Other than updater and properietary codecs like mp3

>>56375259
>Update 1:Mozilla responded, saying that the extension has been removed. At the time of writing this article, the extension’s landing page says “This add-on has been disabled by an administrator”. A statement will follow.

>Update 2:Here comes the statement. “Mozilla reviews and responds expeditiously to reports of abuse. ‘Men Kampf’ was removed after Mozilla received such reports today and it was determined that the add-on violates ourConditions of Use“, says Mozilla director of marketplace and content ecosystem Bertrand Neveux.

>As you can see, Mozilla acted swiftly to remove the extension from the Firefox add-ons store, following reports. Meanwhile, the similar Men Kampf for Chrome continues to be available in Chrome Web Store.

File: 1431768551656.jpg (57KB, 737x691px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 737x691px

>>56368122
>no Pale Moon

>>56368122
>not using lunascape

>>56379780
Oh fuck never mind.