why do people want their record player to look like a toaster?

>>56367889
>2016
>using vinyl records

File: ultra high definition confusion.jpg (2MB, 4000x4000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4000x4000px

why did people start making toasters that looked like record players?

>>56368051
>2016
>not using them
You dumbfuck.

>>56368051
>2016
>thinking there's anything wrong with that

>>56368051
>any year
>succumbing to rotational velocidensity instead of sweet analog goodness

>>56368531
vinyl is the worst when it comes to rotational velocidensity
do you even realize how many dB's of dynamic range you lose with each playback?

>>56368554
>do you even realize how many dB's of dynamic range you lose with each playback?
Has nothing to do with rotational velocidensity.

Can we stop the vinyl meme already?

It's not superior it's just more gay.

Let it die.

>>56368584
Can we stop telling people what to do already?

If they want to listen to vinyls they can listen to vinyls.

Die.

>>56368592

No.

If non idiots don't tell idiots what to do all hell will break loose.

>>56368620
There's literally nothing wrong with listening to vinyls though. Not everone's an audiophile.

>>56368627
No, there's nothing wrong with listening to vinyls.

Going out of your way to listen to vinyl and buying vinyls over other better shit however is dumb.

>>56368661
>Going out of your way to listen to vinyl and buying vinyls over other better shit however is dumb
Nah

>>56368676
>inferior sound quality
>inferior build quality
>often more expensive
>big as fuck

garbage

>>56368732
>no fun allowed
Like I said, not everyone's an audiophile. If I enjoy using vinyls, I have no issue spending more for vinyls.

>>56368746
What does "being an audiophile" have to do with this?

You're just saying "I enjoy buying inferior products because I'm an idiot"

Also reminder a lot of newer vinyl is just a CD rip.

>>56368780
>What does "being an audiophile" have to do with this?
You just listed inferior sound quality as a con.
>Also reminder a lot of newer vinyl is just a CD rip.
So what? CDs aren't packaged in 144sq" of album art.

>>56368800
lol what kind of logic is that? "only an audiophile would see inferior sound quality as a con!"


>vinyl fags

>>56367889
>retro optics
>BLUE LCD

>>56368827
Vinyls sound good enough to listen to. If they didn't, I wouldn't listen to them.

>captain autismo thinks his opinion is law

Cassettes sound good enough to listen to but I'm still not going to go out of my way to listen to them and I doubt you are either.

It's dumb shit for idiots.

File: IMG_20160901_013908.jpg (1MB, 2448x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2448x2448px

>>56368886
Wanna bet?

>>56368904
Yeah, I have a bunch of cassettes I haven't listened to for 20 years too.

>>56368904

I'm not that guy but you're a goddamn retard. Just wanted to say that.

File: IMG_20160901_014356.jpg (727KB, 2448x2448px) Image search: [Google]

727KB, 2448x2448px

>>56368931
I listen to them all the time.

>>56368948
Nah

File: 0005441655_10.jpg (134KB, 1200x715px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 1200x715px

>>56368886
All the cool kids on bandcamp are releasing their artesian beats on tape senpai

>>56368827
Autism.

>It's another "/g/ pretends to like vinyl" thread

If I would ever buy a vinyl, it would be just for collecting purposes.

Do I need to buy an expensive record player to hook up to my stereo? Or is a $70 one good enough for occasional use?

>>56370806
You need one of those $5000 touchless laser turntables unless your want your records scratched

File: 1463518713634.png (754KB, 736x715px) Image search: [Google]

754KB, 736x715px

>tfw you knew the wood panel and electronics meme was coming back into style but were too lazy to capitalize on it