Who Unix (BSD) here?

File: tux.png (105KB, 883x1024px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 883x1024px

>>56355461

>>56355461

I use it for my NAS

>>56355461
I run OpenBSD on my laptops and firewall, FreeBSD on a server, and am going to install OpenBSD on my UMPC when the new SSD comes in

File: sol10autism.png (266KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

266KB, 1920x1080px

Does System V count?

>>56358957
Yes. I recently tried the most recent version of Solaris though and had a very, very disappointing time.

File: now_i_ll_show_them__by_rizzyokuni-dacaz7r.jpg (180KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 1024x683px

>>56355461
>Who Unix (BSD) here?
OSX here.

>>56358970
Yeah, 11 is kind of lame as a desktop system, plenty usable but not very exciting, might as well just use BSD or GNU/Linux with MATE and enjoy way more software compatibility.

>>56359006
It wasn't very usable though. The pkg system didn't work at all for upgrading packages, and the system always froze before poweroff if you had solaris-desktop or X-all installed, thus creating a system that could not shut itself down.
I'm going to try Solaris 10 in a couple days though, hopefully it'll be better than 11.3

Has anyone tried Illumos?

>>56359029
I forgot about that, yeah the package manager was total shit. I just use OpenCSW anyway though so I didn't mess with it much.

10's always been pretty good to me, run it on all my SPARC gear plus this VM I use for dicking around.

>>56359042
DD'd OpenIndiana for a while, it felt very...forgotten, ancient packages, and kind of buggy. At least it was compatible with Solaris software, so you could upgrade the stable version to a semi-usable state.

I've had some people shilling SmartOS to me lately though, might be worth giving that a try.

>>56358957
I thought both BSD and System V kind of started mixing together near the end.

>>56360172
They certainly have. Especially Solaris, since it took a lot of SunOS stuff.
But they're not too mixed.