https://password.kaspersky.com/
How good is your password anon
I should use a better one tho
come @ me fags
>tfw my password is gasthekikesracewarnow
How'd I do?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Undefeatable. And easy to remember for me.
>>56341488
waste of Hitler dubs
kys
>>56340902
>typing your password into a site that doesn't need it
Shiggy
i hope none of you are using your actual password
>>56340902
>>56341552
>typing your password
millenials
>>56341552
>not typing a similar password
Fucking retard
Why don't people use sentences as passwords? They can be long and quite easy to remember.
Every password I tried took 10,000+ centuries.
Thanks KeePass.
>>56340902
This site is complete and utter horse shit.
catswithhorses1920 is rated as 4 centuries, but in reality the first dict you find in a google search would crack it in about 5min.
pretty shit test tho
>6 letters then 4 numbers, all letter different, last 3 numbers same
12 days
>remove the last number so there are only 2 same
4 months
fucking useless
>33 years to "bruteforce" TopZozzleM8
It sucks that the password I actually can type is bruteforceable in a non-infinite amount of time currently. quantum computers and moore's law will break it sooner rather than later. I'll have to see about fixing that.
Most of my passwords are either twelve or sixteen characters, and can be hacked by someone with a botnet or supercomputer. My PGP keys are safe though, as I use 64 characters for my passwords. Wew.
I'm willing to bet that this doesn't have any similar tools to use, like dictionary attacks, huh?
Interesting. You can do a simple shitty password like '7q7w7e7r7t7y7u7i7o7p' and it will still take it a fuckton of centuries to crack. Better than my shitty password I currently use.
>>56343498
The main key is not to show anything about how you might be building your password, and hope that the cracker doesn't have a database of patterns.
>>56343526
Yeah having a rainbow database of commonly known phrases, titles, lyrics from songs and poems etc you could probably crack it quickly.
>implying that kaspersky doesn't use this to make a dictionary
> entering your password in a "password test site" that deposits all passwords into a dictionary
i wonder why governments don´t offer such websites
after all the nsa would profit by having a better database
>>56343751
>after all the nsa would profit by having a better database
>nsa
>better database
They already capture all data 24/7 and have done so for 3+ years now since the Bluffdale systems went online, you stupid fucking person.
>stupid fucking people will be the death of us all