there is literally nothing wrong with systemd

I really like it. I hope we can get a full replacement for all GNU programs.

>>56337856
so say we all

>>56337856
>triggerd, reeeee
in all seriousness, there literally IS nothing wrong with it.

>>56337856
>Gpl licensed, free and open source
>"Just werks"
>Faster boot process
>Eliminates bloat/meme packages

There is NO reason why one should delete systemd from his system. There is nothing systemd can't do what other init systems can.

>Botnet
Source is open, show where

>Not Unix
Neither is linux

>pottering
So what packages did YOU make yesterda

>>56338621
but what makes it better than any other init system

ITT: increasingly nervous systemd shills from Red Hat.

15 rupees have been deposited in your accounts.

Reminder to sage and report.

File: 1465290425966.png (85KB, 552x497px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 552x497px

>>56338757
Well, what makes other init systems better than SystemD?

SystemD is an easy to install, mature and well documented init system, but people dislike it because MUH GNU STUNDRDS DEHUHDEHEH

If you want one truly shit piece of software just look at windows

The hate for it may be somewhat overblown, but it does way more than an init system needs to or should

>>56338757
Faster boot, socket restarts

>>56338757
it actually uses mathematics (systems theory, hence the name) to control the init process instead of relying on some neckbeard to guess at it

>>56337856
is this an OJ brand?

>>56337856
no thanks, i dont want to drink the koolaide

the cake is a lie too

>>56338621
SystemD is a botnet though. Also it is extremely resource hungry. It is a fucking joke on anything embedded or small.

SystemD is what will drive the final nail into the Linux coffin.

>>56340502
>it is extremely resource hungry

citation needed

>>56340526
No, citation not needed. All you need to do is look at the size of the systems.

SystemD is bloated botnet horse shit.

>>56340598
>muh package number
>muh file size

jesus christ /g/ is fucking retarded

>>56340613
It also sucks down way more ram and CPU while running, Windows child.

>>56340598
Cash machines from 2002 can run XP without issue and embedded devices that are so small on memeory don't even run normal sysvinit or any GNU crap anyway, they have static hard-coded boot chain.

Meanwhile systemd is the init system used by many car manufactures for several years now. It boots my BMW's infotainment system.

>>56340671
This is why you're gay though. SystemD and Linus' crazy 64 bit hardon make Linux about the worst embedded OS choice at this time.

Probably why your shitty rapefugee-built car uses such a shitty init system.

>>56340646
>while running

>>56340502

You don't know what a botnet is, do you? Embarrassing display on a technology forum.

>>56342304
Of course I do. It's a meme.

Did they include a mail server yet?
And will Stretch beDebian GNU/systemd?

>>56337856

For desktops/laptops, it's fine.

For servers or clusters it is hideous, if only for the binary log files.

>>56338800

>mature
Kek, not compared to SysVinit it isnt

>>56338327
>triggerd
is that a new systemd component?

>>56338757
Here's what I like about it, listing only things that I found lacking under OpenRC
>user services
>session/seat tracking
>socket activation
>simple suspend/hibernate (pm-utils was a nightmare)
>monotonic timers / random timers
>automatic daemon restarting
>service-based process tracking and management (via cgroups)
>usable logging interface (journalctl)
>service file overrides
and more

>>56339533
Where did you get the idea that systemd was only an init system?

I've had plenty run ins with systemd fucking shit up. but here's a legitimate list of stuff that you objectively should consider reading.

http://suckless.org/sucks/systemd

that being said, normies won't notice sysV from systemd because they are too busy installing $PS1 shit for zsh or fish.

>>56342860
>Here's a mostly misguided list of complaints made by people who have a grossly warped and underinformed understanding of what systemd even *is*

The most amusing part is that they think all of systemd is in pid1, when pid1 (i.e. “init”) is literally one of the smallest components.

Yeah let's all use a high security OS and then fuck that over by presenting an adversary (read: NSA) with the largest attack space possible. :^)

Why aren't you using systemdick goyim?

Shave 500ms off your boot time so we can access your system even faster when Intel AMT fails us.