Should I learn HTML even if I don't have any artistic sense?

>>56299347
When I was 15 I learned HTML in a week. Do it for fun even if you don't plan on really using it.

>>56299482
Is it really that easy to learn?

>>56301076
even a 15 year old can do it!

>>56301076
There's nothing artistic about html since it only deals with text for the most part. To give your web page colour you then need to add some CSS

>>56299347
Don't confuse HTML with Graphic Design

File: 1447273548861.jpg (299KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

299KB, 1920x1080px

>>56301118

Should I learn both then?

File: helloworld-no-css.png (32KB, 1264x861px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 1264x861px

>>56301265
Do you plan on making websites like this?

>>56301265
No. A website is a document. If you want to learn more than HTML, consider learning XML and XHTML.
CSS is just garbage used by people who want to polish turds. If your document is good, people will read it regardless of how it looks.

>>56301076
There's a lot more to html than meets the eye. It's easy to learn but hard to master.

The thing about HTML is that you're not going to do shit with just HTML. You need HTML, CSS, and JavaScript to even create the most basic, passable website these days.

Seriously, unless you're going to do this for a living (and compete with the entire country of India), just use a template.

>>56301840
>Seriously, unless you're going to do this for a living (and compete with the entire country of India), just use a template.
You still really ought to know how to do things by hand, even if it's not an efficient use of time.

>>56301296

>If your document is good, people will read it regardless of how it looks.

This is totally wrong actually. People will read shit that looks nice and ignore good stuff that looks boring. This is true anywhere in the world and it has been like that for decades at least.

>>56302154
>4chan

>>56302154
>and it has been like that for decades at least
Ahahaha no.
It's been like that since we invented writing.