manjaro

File: 760653.png (52KB, 924x1400px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 924x1400px

Even /g/ can make a logo without having to indulge in copyright infringement.

>>56293982
Kek'd. Almost as funny as Debian being sued by Pixar for their logo being Buzz's chin swirl.

>>56293920
wtf i hate linux now
Windows 10 doesn't make that shit

>>56293982
nin literally encourages people to torrent their music and they posted all their music to youtube on purpose so I suspect they won't care about the manjaro logo

>>56294387

Nor would they care about Linux, much like any sane person.

I just installed it, excited as fuck to be honest.

How secure is it?

>>56295548
As secure as you make it yourself.

>>56295583
What would you suggest to make it secure?

>>56295548
Well, their SSL certificates on their website expired soooo

>>56295600
VPN
Crypt HDD

Why you need it so superdupersecure?
If you're a tinfoilhat go get Tails.

I just installed this distro myself, and i got to say. Everything just fucking works.

EVERYTHING
JUST
WERKS

Manjaro is not a very cool OS.

>>56297178
The fuck you mean not a very cool OS?

File: 2016-08-27_19-29-19.jpg (574KB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

574KB, 3840x2160px

>>56297196
It doesn't really do anything Arch doesn't do except give you packages a week late

To prove I do know what Manjaro is, here's a scrot. I actually use Manjaro to access my payroll for work but it is not very cool.

>>56297222
You run distros in vmware, you're not actually using it as an OS in my opinion.

Why would you log into vmware from a windows machine to access your payroll?

File: 2000px-SBurb_Logo.svg.png (40KB, 2000x2116px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 2000x2116px

>>56293920
reminds me of the spurb logo

>>56297251
only the freetard version of java seems to work right because the website is really old and using the latest java makes it complain about security certificate problems that I can't be assed to make go away.

Why doesn't using an OS in vmware count as using it? It serves a purpose and to be fair it does it fine, but there's no reason to use it over Arch.

File: Screenshot_2016-08-28_01-36-19.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

I like it. I prefer xfce to gnome so I like it better than Fedora.

For me, only Fedora and Manjaro actually work/ez to tweak. I've had issues with every other major distro (except gentoo and arch, way too lazy to try them),

>>56297281
Give me a reason to use arch over manjaro?
>a week late updates
Who gives a flying shit?

>>56297318
>Give me a reason to use arch over manjaro?
Do you want tacos made by an authentic Mexican chef or tacos made by a guy that read that chef's blog?

>>56297313
Im afraid to post screenfetch because i actually put real name as username, can't really figure out a way to change it.

>>56297332
>Would you like your pizza made from Dominos when Pizza is actually italian.

Stop with the autism please, be real.

It's just an arch installer, no hassle. Nothing wrong with the os.

>>56297352
I'd prefer real pizza to Domino's, sure.

>>56297352
also it's NOT just an Arch installer. In fact you can't even guarantee the packages from Arch are 100% binary compatible with Manjaro packages - I remember reading this before.

If you want an Arch installer, look at Architect or something. Even Antergos is closer to what you describe, though it does add in one non-official repository for convenience. But it uses the actual Arch repos unlike Manjaro.

>>56297341

# usermod -l newname oldname

>>56297455
usermod user xxxx is currently used by process.

File: 13833376_1155637141144361_701450389_o.jpg (230KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 1920x1080px

I've "tested" all the proper manjaro editions and all the community ones too.
The two I've liked the most were the deepin and jwm editions.
I tired to use majaro + deepin as my main os, but failed on me after some updates, after a week, but if we overlook this little fuckup, it was working perfectly.
The problem with the jwm edition was that I couldn't get my touchpad to work properly and i gave up after a hour, and went back to ubuntu.

File: Screenshot_20160828_085258.png (534KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

534KB, 1366x768px

Manjaro masterrace reporting in

>>56295548
Less secure than vanilla Arch. Manjaro does their regular syncs to the unstable branch. This includes security updates to already 'stable' packages. Arch doesn't do this all daily approves syncs that aren't undergoing testing in their upstream. So while Arch's packages are secure with the latest relevant updates applied, Manjaro users are waiting for the latest security to exit testing before it's applied to weak packages.

>>56294387
>>56295057
>they
>nin
well guess you don't know the band all that well

>>56297380
>>56298375
These statements are correct

t. Arch User