France and Germany interior ministers (the two persons in pic

They will lose, just like their HADOPI system is a huge failure and waste of money.

Banning encryption is not even technically feasible.

You can't make "encryption" illegal any more than you can make "doors" illegal.

>>56258956
You'd be surprised about German building regulations, mate.

Has there been any proof that ISIS uses encryption?

>>56258880
I don’t think HADOPI is a failure. Now that the loopholes concerning torrenting have disappeared, I can download all I want and will risk nothing until I recieve a written warning.

>>56259081
Citation needed, but from what I read, the previous terrorists (Bataclan, etc) did not use encryption. They were actually using the PlayStation Network to chat.

The two last ones (killing the old priest) used Telegram.

>>56258780

> let in invaders
> spy on natives

Globalism at work.

In the Netherlands it took quite some effort to convince the government encryption is fine. And not to introduce decryption orders.

And now Germany and France will force it onto us. And our government will just use that as an excuse.
>our hands our tied sorry

What does that even mean ? "if the government can't spy on your computers you're a criminal" ?

>>56259803
Basically this

Muh "B-But i have nothing to hide xD" led us to this situation

>>56258780
You think you've got it bad? I'm a Britbong. We've got a Dolores Umbridge lookalike as unelected PM who wants to revoke the Human Rights Act, make the mass surveillance and mass hacking they're already doing legal, and ban encryption.

I will be telling her the same thing I told her when she was trying to ban porn: fuck off.

>>56259081
No, mostly just OPSEC. The grugq has a good set of writeups.