It's over for Intel, they are finished.

AMD seems more daring with cache association and the L3.
This is pretty much the largest difference with SKL/BRD

>>56240385
>L0 cache
Isn't that the uOP cache?

>that AGU difference
Unless AMD's caches are magical they're gonna get hit real hard for those lack of AGUs in virtualization.

How is it allowed that AMD copies Intel technolgy(HT) and makes their CPU practically the same !!

Imagine how Intel must feel for its hard work to be copied by a two-bit company

@56240850
not this time, bait-kun

>>56240909
>@

AMDfags are newfags

>>56240850
Intel & AMD have a cross-licensing agreement. They both borrow & copy high level ideas from each other all the time, though of course the gritty technical details differ.

>>56240850
Amd designed the first consumer x86-64 cpu.

Intel could have made their own implementation , or copy amds implementation. Guess what Intel did .

>>56241000
Make something better :)

>>56240850
Sixty-four bit, thank you very much

>>56240627
Considering Intel has been doing this equally aggressively and for longer, how the fuck does this have any bearing on their performance vs. Intel?

>>56240385
Intel has a slightly advantage in everything, buffer, register load/store sizes, has faster decoders, and a proven L3 cache design.
It loses in primary cache sizes, but caches are all latency, can the much bigger L2 8way cache do its job?