>tfw daily forever zen+vega masterrace threads
>>56193834
My next build will be full AMD, but not because AMD is better, but because of the monopolistic shit Nvidia is pulling against them (the same deal with Intel).
>>56193834
And when it finally gets released and we get some proper nonbiased benchmarks, I'm willing to bet It'll be a huge disappointment. It will overheat as fuck and not be able to reach high end intel cpu's.
>>56193955
you can always say anything will fail
that way you always have your bases covered
>>56194668
I just follow the statistics. AMD havent released anything that could beat anything in its group since Athlon 64.
>>56194789
5870 was a shit slapper and all their GPU's have been competitive if not a flat out better value.
Also their Phenom CPU's for a time were a considerably better value.
You're only proving my point then by bringing up Athlons.
Your assumptions based on track record don't cut mustard.
>>56193910
>monopolistic shit
Nvidia isn't preventing you from buying AMD, don't be fucking retarded. (by buying AMD)
>>56194789
>since Athlon 64
Guess who they got to design Zen
>>56194936
That's ATI.
>>56194975
nah, i have already used ATI/AMD stuff several times in the past with 0 problems
>>56195727
AMD is ATI and has been long before the 5000 series
>>56195944
terascale 4 and 5 were designed before the acquisition. they started work on GCN right after the acquisition because AMD wanted to try and compete in the new gpgpu market.
>>56195966
The same people working on the 5000 series worked on GCN architecture. You're talking about an acquisition that occurred a DECADE ago. Technology changes by the second much less 10 years time.