Unigine Valley Benchmark

File: a.png (55KB, 558x576px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 558x576px

clicked extremehd preset, not sure why it's saying custom here
gpu is a HD7850, 2G, running on mesa/radeonsi (foss driver)

>>56189539
I guess with the proprietary driver you could get better performance.

>>56189581
probably, but the free one is more flexible, runs with the latest kernels, is more stable, and is fast enough for my purposes

>>56189368
>valley
love this meme

File: 5165189198.jpg (52KB, 566x643px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 566x643px

>>56189368

>>56189368
Fuck, I ran the benchmark but it didn't fucking screenshot. I had 21FPS, score ~850 on a GTX 960m + Intel Core i5-6300HQ.

File: Unbenannt.png (65KB, 1129x878px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 1129x878px

And a Geekbench run 4 da lulz.

>>56189368
/v/alley

File: valley.png (35KB, 934x848px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 934x848px

here you go

>>56189921
noice

Just downloading it now lads, prepare to be blown away

>>56189966
Intel Atom incoming?

File: unigine_valley.png (33KB, 641x610px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 641x610px

cpu @ 4.4ghz

File: 1080.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>56189368
ive been meaning to OC this 1080, but it boosts to 2,000mhz so

File: GTX1080 heaven 4.0.png (28KB, 378x353px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 378x353px

>>56189987
fuck, idk why it did that

>>56189921
wow, a $500 CPU loses to a 2600K
intel really has dropped the ball.

>>56189987
>>56190040
get it together man
not only are your screenshots terrible, you're not even running the same benchmark

File: 1450356503040.jpg (106KB, 749x826px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 749x826px

>>56190040
>378x353

File: 35345.png (43KB, 1909x968px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 1909x968px

>>56189921
I see 1080 is totally worth it, good job Nvidia. And my 980ti was even half a turd.

File: GTX1080 valley 1.0.png (42KB, 505x443px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 505x443px

>>56189921
>>56190062
sry, i'm a bit drunk

here's a better one.
still 7% slower than a top of the line 6800K

>>56190279
you turned off the AA mid bench and turned it back on.
980ti hit around 90fps when OCd in valley.

>>56190294
Lol no I didnt, and you should check some benchmarks. My card was at 1450Mhz and its a pretty normal score.

File: Unbenannt.png (1MB, 1602x927px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1602x927px

>>56189987

File: 00000.png (776KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

776KB, 1366x768px

she's a bit warm now lads

>>56190917
lolwat

File: valley.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>56189921
what clock is your 1080?

because i only scored 5 points less with my overclocked 980 ti

>>56189368
>2.1ghz

I can only imagine playing arma 3 on that beast

>>56189368
cpu bottleneck

>>56190972
It started with 2025mhz on the core, but it dropped down to 1987mhz at the end. Memory is at 11000mhz

File: snip.jpg (58KB, 790x683px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 790x683px

>>56189368
I think you are fucked, you min FPS is way too low.

>>56191112
That sucks, my gigabyte xtreme starts at 2100 but falls to 2088 then 2066. Temps are in the 50s, I need more juice!

>>56191156
its because this benchmark is only using 1 core of my 8 and they are only at 2.1GHz

>>56189732
It saves a HTML file to your document folder.

>>56191202
Yeah you would get better results from a i3 2100

>>56191231
i know

File: 1471288334628s.jpg (2KB, 109x124px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 109x124px

>>56191241
Just that you know

File: valley.png (614KB, 748x585px) Image search: [Google]

614KB, 748x585px

>>56189368

λ ./valley 
Loading "/home/nand/.Valley/valley_1.0.cfg"...
Loading "libGPUMonitor_x64.so"...
Loading "libGL.so.1"...
Loading "libopenal.so.1"...
ALWrapper::init(): can't load "libopenal.so.1" library
libopenal.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Can't initialize OpenAL wrapper. Install latest OpenAL.
Warning "null" sound app is used
Set 4096x2160 fullscreen video mode
GLAppWindow::create_visual(): glXChooseFBConfig(): failed
Engine::video_restart(): can't set 4096x2160 fullscreen video mode

Can't set video mode
ALWrapper::init(): can't load "libopenal.so.1" library
libopenal.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Can't initialize OpenAL wrapper. Install latest OpenAL.
Warning "null" sound app is used
GLAppWindow::create_visual(): glXChooseFBConfig(): failed
Engine::video_restart(): can't set 4096x2160 fullscreen video mode

Set 1280x720 windowed video mode
GLAppWindow::create_visual(): glXChooseFBConfig(): failed

Unigine fatal error
GLAppWindow::create_visual(): glXChooseFBConfig(): failed
Engine::video_restart(): can't set 1280x720 windowed video mode
Shutdown
^C

Unigine quality

File: Capture.png (34KB, 568x544px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 568x544px

Why is GPU-z seemingly the only application that can understand more than 4GB of vRAM?

>>56191282
>libopenal.so.1

Its obviously that you are missing a lib. Blame your OS.

>>56189368
which preset you dumb cucK?

>>56191330
Cant you read?

It says Extreme HD

>>56191324
I also just noticed it thinks Windows 10 is Windows 8. Huh.

>>56191043
i got this over the 6800k because

MOAR PCIe lanes
MOAR CORES
and less TDP

Im mostly doing Lightroom, Photoshop and Blender work with it.

>>56191327
If you don't know what the hell you are talking about, you may want to keep your mouth shut

File: Capture.png (38KB, 879x643px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 879x643px

>>56189368
pls no bully

File: 2016-08-16-unigine-default-gtx-1060.png (29KB, 529x619px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 529x619px

MSI GeForce GTX 1060 6GT OC GDDR5 6GB Dual Fan OC @ Stock

>>56191382
its your system idiot, seems like >>56189539 has no problem with it.

>>56191438
If you don't know what the hell you are talking about, you may want to keep your mouth shut

>>56191357
Coulda got a 6850k or 5930k, 12 threads vs 8, and with a overclock to 4.5ghz you wouldn't be bottlenecking a gtx 560. 40 pcie lanes as well. Actually what is the purpose of 40 lanes with a shit processor? You can't sli with that thing.

>>56191469
What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I’m the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You’re fucking dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that’s just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little shit. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little “clever” comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You’re fucking dead, kiddo.

>>56191491
>the only thing you can do is copy/paste shit memes on 4chan
What a worthwhile contribution to society

File: Capture111111.png (36KB, 533x625px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 533x625px

I am fine with this.

>>56191478
My cpu has 16 Threads not 8. I don't Bottleneck anything on my Workflow. Plus I love having a dead Silent pc. The low tdp comes very Handy for that

>>56191539
>amd

Bottlenecking that 970

When you gonna move up to an i3 with the big boys?

>>56191539

How is it so bad, the FX 9590?

I would of expected at least 2500 score.

>>56191509
Says the guy who cant even get a simple benchmark running.

>>56191543
Wouldn't want to give up 4 threads for 2ghz clock? There are many ways to have a silent pc.

>>56191564
Unlike you I actually know perfectly what the problem is, partly because I recognize what's going wrong by looking at the pattern of the screenshot itself, and partly because I can read error messages (unlike you).

I also know how to fix it. I just don't care. See you in some other thread, loser.

>>56191552
>>56191561

I have had it for a little while and it runs anything I play right now. I don't have the time to put into playing a heavy amount of games at the moment so not too worried about upgrading, also life gets in the way.

Maybe when I have more time I will switch to an intel build. I do feel like their processors are a lot better. I was a full AMD build before. Hence staying with the AMD processor but switching to an nvidia card.

Maybe 2018 I will do a full rebuild.

File: RE5jV.png (90KB, 257x318px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 257x318px

>>56191585

>>56191570
Not for a higher TDP.
I dont want a XBOX Huge CPU Cooler and also i dont want an AIO watercooling.

>>56191478
this. his 8c/16t at 2ghz peforms on par with a 6c/12t 4.5ghz in multithreading.

>>56191478
PS: i dont need SLI for blender multigpu rendering

File: r9 290.png (25KB, 543x618px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 543x618px

3 year old R9 290 coming through.

>>56191640
Right, so they did the 40 pcie lanes sell you? Got 4 network adapters in there?

>>56191691
>Right, so they did the 40 pcie lanes sell you? Got 4 network adapters in there?
No, adding 2 more GTX1070 is blender support is there.

>>56191699
I see

>>56191726
thats not the right preset bro

File: 1449816590194.jpg (53KB, 637x662px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 637x662px

I don't play at pleb aspect ratio of 16:9 only 16:10.

File: Capture.png (36KB, 632x670px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 632x670px

when you see it..

File: 1471193302001.jpg (75KB, 626x662px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 626x662px

>>56191813
You and I are almost the same

>>56191834
That's with SLi? Interesting.

File: Capture.png (36KB, 649x653px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 649x653px

>>56191838
git gud

>>56191845
Yeah, the cpu was a placeholder, once I jumped to the fx-8370, I got 60-100 fps.

File: unigine 3.png (104KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 1920x1080px

>>56191729
Eat my short dick.

Only reason it says custom now is because I had to turn on fullscreen.

>>56191838
>>56191852

Just noticed mines a 2gb and yours is a 4gb, what is bottlenecking you?

File: 5870.png (28KB, 587x657px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 587x657px

surprised mine even did it. even got up to 30 fps
only 6 years old though.

>>56191880
Yea my 7950 is what 4 or 5? Feels like an eternity.

>>56191838
Damn son. We're half bros.

>>56191539
This is an incorrect score. I got a much higher score on my fx-8370 and gtx 960 2gb, something you are doing is very very wrong.

>>56191946
Drivers maybe? It has to be something since even the 960's on AMD score better.

>>56191973
Drivers aren't that out of date, will update now and re-test when im back from the store.

File: 2016-08-19 11.38.02.jpg (1MB, 3456x1942px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3456x1942px

>>56191813
>16:10

Try 21:9 pleb

>>56191879
CPU I guess

>>56191973
someone needs to check their shit then. that shit aint right.

A 960 overclocked to the max shouldnt even be close to an underclocked 970. Especially a 2gb 960 AND a lower end cpu.

File: valley_2016_08_21_16_18_07_695.jpg (977KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

977KB, 1920x1080px

Holy fuck the CPU bottleneck is huge, I never thought I'd see the day. I think I saw like 85% GPU load in a single scene, it was around 50% otherwise.

>>56192003
b-but thats a better cpu.

>>56192017
>tfw running an i7-4790 and want to get one or two 1080's

I've thought of this as a pretty damn good CPU until I saw your post.

>>56192037
What resolution? I actually play games at 4K, there's no bottleneck there. 1080 SLI for 1080p is stupid though, you'll have a huge CPU bottleneck no matter what.

File: Unigine.png (51KB, 1358x704px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 1358x704px

>>56189368
Is this normal for a gtx 980

>>56192073
looks good

>>56192073
Maybe it started thermal throttling at the second test, thus lower score on lower preset.

>>56192002
21:9 still pleb ratio tho

>>56192057
1080p. I'm looking to future-proof myself for several years.

>>56192098
the right one is a different benchmark

>>56192108
oh, woops yeah its all gud.

>>56192106
I don't know if I would spend the scratch on a 1080 for 1080p. 1070 would tops maybe something cheaper since new stuff with more DX12 support in a year or two will be better to sink into.

>>56192106
There's no point for SLI at 1080p. It won't really do anything, for a resolution that low you're almost literally burning cash for nothing. Future proofing with a $1200+ GPU setup is also pretty stupid, if you don't need $1200+ worth of GPUs now, why not buy a single $600+ 1080 now and spend the rest in 2 years when you need an upgrade?

>>56192128
This, 2x 1080 is just retarded for 1080p. Atleast move up to 2560x1440 144hz

File: 1469018286809.jpg (76KB, 625x468px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 625x468px

>>56192106
8gb vram
>1.1gb in use

>>56192128
>>56192139
>>56192145
I won't be doing anything anytime soon anyway, child support rapes my checks so I have to save up over a long time.

I'm running dual 950's at the moment. I'd like to get a 21:9 144 hz monitor but I know they're goddamn expensive.

>>56192145
Yea. If he doesn't move up to newer monitors I'd likely buy a 1060 6GB or RX480 8GB/470 4GB save the cash for later. It's his money though so whatever get what makes you happy.

>>56192166
Oh man that sucks. Yea the gov loves to just stick their hands in your shit. They keep eyes on all your checking/savings. Fkin mouth breathers.

>>56190040
>Preset: custom

gee wonder why

>>56190917
>>56191387
>>56191880
poorfags, KYS ASAP

>>56192189
Tell me about it. As it stands, I have $100 from each paycheck going to a different savings account. So, provided I don't dip into that at all, it'd take me about 3-4 months to be able to afford a single 1080.

>>56192257
They cleaned out my brothers checking account and closed the account. Bank sent a notice a week or two afterwards so he wasn't alerted. Auto garnished his paycheck at work. This was just the start after an agreement was reached. Lost his job when the depression hit in 08' and I went down there with him and the land whale behind the plexiglass basically said charge the payments on your CC or we take your license and toss you in jail. No mercy. This is in Florida BTW a state that's not totally screwed over.

>>56192256
Rude. Anyway I'm hopefully going to be upgrading to a RX 470/i5 6600 in a month or so, I'm bloody sick of gaming on a craptop.

>>56192336
470 looks to be a perfect budget card IMO.

>>56192334
I went to tell the child support office that my ex was getting my child support money while working an under the table job, getting food stamps, and living in income based housing.

The child support worker looked me in the eye and said "So she cheats the system; how's that any concern of yours or mine?|

File: Valley_Bench.jpg (78KB, 652x701px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 652x701px

strix 980 at 1466 mhz and +350 on mem using his full 125% tdp at 245 watts... temps are at 60-63 C fans at 51%, cpu at 3.9 on all 4 cores...

>>56192358
Pennsylvania, by the way.

>>56192401
It was a huge red pill witnessing that shit happen.

>>56192468
Try being the one it happens to.

I was so pissed off when she told me that. I just walked out. My only other option was to go to court to see about getting it modified, which could help or hurt me. She has no diploma and no GED, and only works minimum wage, dead-end jobs. She has no motivation to get a better job because she knows that if she makes more, she'll get less from me.

>>56192492
You have to be careful about what you say on social media and around friends too. If she catches wind that you're happy and in a better position you better believe she will take your ass to court to get more gibmedats from you.

File: Heaven_Bench.jpg (85KB, 635x711px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 635x711px

>>56192390
same systeme same config

>>56192503
I know. I don't post on social media. And I don't really have any friends, so that's not a concern either.

She's smart enough to play stupid enough to fuck me over.

File: Capture.jpg (49KB, 602x538px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 602x538px

Using MSI Afterburner, 116% power limit, +125MHz core clock.
Throughout the benchmark gpu boost was at 2060MHz, temps at 80c.
MSI 1060 6GT.

File: unigina.png (44KB, 572x694px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 572x694px

i guess its ok for a 280x

File: 1471124290011.jpg (76KB, 767x960px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 767x960px

970 got 65FPS with my shitty i5 750

I should really get a newer CPU.

File: va.png (24KB, 779x646px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 779x646px

>>56192898
That's better than mine.

File: misab.png (253KB, 1136x808px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 1136x808px

>>56193092
I used MSIAB though, can't really overclock the cpu, that must be it?

>>56191282
your OpenGL setup is broken
let me guess, nvidia?

>>56192996
you must have a decent overclock on that 970, comes very close to >>56189665

File: 1466530655123.jpg (42KB, 576x522px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 576x522px

I got like 45~ FPS and a score of 1188 on an R9 390, paired with a 4690K. There's gotta be something wrong.

>>56193201
Interesting. Mine here >>56193092 is running at 1145/1600. CPU is at 4.6GHz.

File: Valley.png (37KB, 888x731px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 888x731px

Not bad for a mobile GPU score i don't think

>>56193613
ya something is not right. u should be getting around ~65 fps, 2600-2800

File: valley.png (37KB, 637x657px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 637x657px

Almost 3.5 yrs old and still better than most budget cards =)

>>56193644
i did notice something with the latest drivers (16.8.2 Hotfix) they made the card underperform big time, i rolled back to 16.7.3 and all back to normal

other than that, maybe the amount of RAM maybe? (16gb ddr3 1600mhz etc)

>>56193435
MSI
I can get the clock speed to 1500 but after that things get iffy.
Memory like +350 3850. Starts crashing after that.

File: benchmark.png (36KB, 548x614px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 548x614px

think my 3570k @ 4.2 may have caused the dips in FPS

File: ss (2016-08-21 at 17.58.22).png (29KB, 622x549px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 622x549px

Spent 219€ on this 4GB RX 480 recently
I'm perfectly happy with it

File: file.png (21KB, 846x644px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 846x644px

>>56193815
Tried rolling back to 16.7.3. Thanks AMD.
On a side note, I do have shitty RAM.

File: 1455013705938.jpg (53KB, 680x686px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 680x686px

Stock five year old HD 7950

Pls no bully.

>>56193815
noticed something like that on my r9 290x too, I'm also back to 16.7.3

File: ss+(2016-08-21+at+08.14.44).png (33KB, 609x658px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 609x658px

>>56189368
>>56189921
How did I do?

>i7-3770K @ 4.7GHz w/ HT on
>GTX 780 Lightning 2-Way SLI overclocked @ 1124 MHz
>OS is actually Win10 Enterprise

>>56189368
Man, you're bottlenecked out the ass. That's around the same score an overclocked 1060 gets.

File: valley.jpg (149KB, 497x427px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 497x427px

help

Can we establish the fact that a 970 was close to a 1070
>>56189368
>>56189665

File: Capture.png (1009KB, 961x539px) Image search: [Google]

1009KB, 961x539px

>>56191585
Now this is autism

>>56196603
because op is bottlenecked up the nose

>>56196499
check your drivers, if you have the latest hotfix roll back to 16.7.3

File: FuryX_Unigine_Valley.jpg (79KB, 674x697px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 674x697px

>>56189368
1070 confirmed slower than Fury X :^)

File: HP stronk.png (44KB, 854x767px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 854x767px

Lowest score coming through.
Try to beat it, I fucking dare you.

>>56197239
>using the smiley with a carat nose

>>56197239
see >>56190972
:v

>>56197431
>thermal throttling
kek you poor saps

>>56191112
my 1080 boosts stock to 1987 as well
seems to be the wall with 1080s
>>56196150
>overclocked @ 1124 MHz
my 780ti had a STOCK boost of 1163mhz out of the box
you should be able to hit 1,300

>>56197526
no, my 1080 has an 8 pin and 6pin and never goes beyond 76% power limit.

the 1080 isn't the replacement for the 980ti, the 1080ti will be.

>>56197557
>never goes beyond 76% power limit.
how can you check this?

File: MyValley 1080p.jpg (203KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 1920x1080px

feels old

>>56197526
not as poor as the keks that bought a fury x

File: MSI AB.png (31KB, 721x750px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 721x750px

>>56197565
MSI afterburner or PrecisonX
they both graph a bunch of shit.

>>56197622
thanks anon

File: Capture.jpg (52KB, 599x672px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 599x672px

290X
Eh, I'm not going to complain. Not the best result, but it's running fine.
Old drivers, maybe new one will give a better result.

File: fdggfdgfdgfd.jpg (120KB, 536x533px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 536x533px

>>56191395
So is the 10 lesser fps just my shitty CPU?

File: valley2.png (32KB, 900x670px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 900x670px

>>56192591
Pretty close to mine

Gpu core is at 1600mhz, 8000mhz memory with 110% power limit. Temps stay right around 70C
MSI 970 4G

>>56197239
its because my 2.1ghz xeon

>>56197731
this benchmark is just single threaded so low clock speeds or amd cpus are going to look bad.

File: GTX 1080 2,000mhz.jpg (58KB, 495x436px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 495x436px

>>56189368
my CPU is bottlenecking me
anything past 2,000mhz and the scores are identical.

>>56197731
>$500 gpu
LOL what a fucking joke

File: GTX 1060 6gb.png (211KB, 1359x357px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 1359x357px

>>56198105
>$500 gpu
is this bait?

File: opera_2016-08-21_15-45-06.png (70KB, 1208x946px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 1208x946px

This was the most boring 3 minutes of my life.
I don't even understand the results, why would I need to know how well some faggot tree bullshit runs on my system? As far as I could tell this isn't even a game.

>>56198290
Also it doesn't even know my GPU lol

>>56198290
it's a benchmark broski
you use it to compare to other GPUs and test overclocks.

>not sure if bait

>>56198321
>you use it to compare to other GPUs
lmao, so the plan is to buy a bunch of graphics cards and try them out to see which I like best?
Fucking dumb

File: 1468371899453.gif (4MB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 480x480px

>>56197615
>buying a $700.00 GTX 1080 only to have throttle to 980ti performance
at least its faster than the previous generation kek

File: valleybench.jpg (170KB, 1130x1231px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 1130x1231px

>>56189368
plz laugh at my setup while i wait for kaby lake/zen

CPU @ 4.6

>>56197673
looks fine, only 1 fps diff between mine
>>56189978

>>56198431
Zen will have the same performance as your current cpu

>>56198105
did you misread the gpu or..?

>>56197350
lmaoing at ur life

File: 1466618036562.jpg (20KB, 527x409px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 527x409px

>>56198311
well now it's obvious that ur using bait
are you new here?

File: Valley 1080p Preset.png (31KB, 719x562px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 719x562px

I thought the 980 ti was no longer a contender compared to the gtx 10xx series. My 980 ti classified was boosting to 1585mhz.

File: heaven.png (31KB, 590x603px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 590x603px

>>56189368

>>56198534
Still a good card. If I had bought one instead of a 970, I would see no reason to upgrade for a while.
Plus you can sli too which would be cheaper than upgrading to a 10XX.

>>56198518
It put my integrated and my nvidia one and I didn't see the nvidia one at first, anon

>>56198561
Was thinking of it. Problem is finding a second 980ti Classified that is ACTUALLY a 980ti classy. Apparently there are like 3 versions. 980ti classy GAMING, 980ti classy ACX (even though they all are ACX), and now there is a newer 980ti classy REF. (Literally a reference clocked 980ti chip with uncertain OC potential slapped onto the 980ti classy board.)

That and the price has to be right. Not going to pay $500 for a 2nd 980ti classy if I could get a brand new top binned 1070 for $450. How well would 980ti SLI hold up for 1440p?

>>56198545
doesnt look right, while fps is higher your score is 1000 pts less than both these gtx 1060s,
>>56191395
>>56192591

File: ss+(2016-06-29+at+09.29.44).jpg (181KB, 927x733px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 927x733px

r9 290, best result I've gotten

>>56198722
nice. water cooled r9 290?

File: 8198181981.jpg (49KB, 586x546px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 586x546px

>>56198601
>980ti SLI hold up for 1440p
I'm sure at 1440p you could achieve a steady 60fps in demanding titles at ultra settings with msaa and other filters.

File: ss (2016-08-21 at 05.23.39).jpg (85KB, 1488x247px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 1488x247px

>>56198747
nope, sapphire tri-x

I had to set voltage fairly high and my VRMs would get pretty hot in Firestrike

File: s-l1600.jpg (259KB, 1200x1600px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 1200x1600px

>>56198601
I'm not sure how much you trust used parts, but this guy has one for $415.

>http://www.ebay.com/itm/EVGA-980-Ti-Classified-/222225988317?hash=item33bdb37add:g:RfQAAOSwIgNXufXt

>>56198791
cool. last thing, whats your core/memory clocks? thanks

>>56198807
My local microcenter actually has a 980ti Classy open box for $360. I live 10 minutes away and can go get it right now...but IDK. I've done multi-GPU in the past and they always end with me saying "Fuck, should have just gotten the top tier new GPU."

Decisions decisions.

File: ss (2016-08-21 at 05.32.55).png (45KB, 939x951px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 939x951px

>>56198892
I flashed it to 390 bios

I believe I had to run +150mV, and it was barely stable enough to run benchmarks

I daily 1100/1400

>>56198906
Do they have any kind of a return policy on the open box?
Thats really that not bad for a 980ti.

>>56198906
buy it. worst case you resell it for $400 easy

File: r9 390.png (30KB, 668x546px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 668x546px

I don't fucking get why my R9 390 runs like shit.

>>56198978
post clocks and voltages

drivers up to date? have you done the Valley performance tweaks? other programs open at same time?

>>56198978
like i said to the other guy, latest drivers (hotfix) is causing some cards to underperfom

try and roll back to 16.7.3 and check again

File: valley.png (113KB, 996x1141px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 996x1141px

>>56189368

>>56198933
thx

File: 2016-08-21_17.41.10.jpg (242KB, 1223x512px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 1223x512px

>>56198807
just buy new. register for 3yr warranty. profit.

buy used, warranty won't carry over. can't remember but i think there is a deadline to register as well.

File: b1.png (32KB, 528x522px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 528x522px

>>56189368
Stock clocks

>>56198948
Yea you can return anything for any reason within 30 days. If you get a 2 year warranty, you can return for any reason within those 2 years.
>>56198958
True.

File: clocks.png (401KB, 1239x981px) Image search: [Google]

401KB, 1239x981px

>>56199011
If this is what you mean, this is what I have.
>>56199020
I'll give this a try and see if it makes a difference.

>>56189368
>.exe
Kys

>>56199193
Oh, and I haven't had anything else opened, and I just installed it, chose the Extreme HD preset, and started the benchmark.

>>56199193
also

http://www.overclock.net/t/1360884/official-top-30-unigine-valley-benchmark-1-0#

>>56199193
>>56198978
okay after using your settings (1040 core, 1500 memory) on my 290 with 390 bios, I get pic related, which is pretty similar to yours, except I'm using older (potentially more stable?) drivers

a lot of those scores on OC.net I'm assuming are very high binned and/or watercooled, which is why some 7970s and 770s are hitting 2500

try upping the power limit and voltage, and aim for at least 1100 core and 1600 memory. maybe try rolling back drivers?

File: ss (2016-08-21 at 05.57.44).png (30KB, 617x543px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 617x543px

>>56199396
forgot pic

>>56189368
Check this out? Pretty impressed with this but hoped for more. Going to try work on the cooling for the CPU see if I can squeeze more out of it.

File: Capture.png (29KB, 1079x550px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 1079x550px

>>56199462
Fuck got excited and forgot pic.

File: Screenshot_7.png (30KB, 568x548px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 568x548px

>>56199225
>>56199396
Okay, so I downgraded down to 16.7.3, applied those tweaks at the end of that OP, and just to see if it would make a different, removed the OC on my 4690K, and got this. Looks better than before at least.

File: Untitled.png (48KB, 510x455px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 510x455px

GTX 1080 G1 @ 1999 MHz
http://pcpartpicker.com/list/2NThtJ

>>56199530
thats a decent improvement at least, anon

>>56199530
definitely better

can you hit 1200 core? I'm sure that would firmly put you over 3000. you might need to crank up that voltage though

File: 1470040994131.jpg (55KB, 676x699px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 676x699px

Would I see an improvement if I stopped all the pokemongo bots and closed my FF tabs? Chrome is running with hangouts desktop. It shouldn't make that much of a difference really.

File: Valley4.2.png (36KB, 553x634px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 553x634px

>>56199539
did it again at 3440x1440

>>56199638
wouldn't hurt

When are they adding vulkan? GFXBench do Vulkan yet?

File: 00000.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

My old config is still doing the job

>>56199664
I gained 100 in score with closing python etc. Five year old card :(

>>56199827
Looks good. Is that tweaked though? 600 series is supposed to compete with HD 7000 series so 1500-2000 should be possible.

File: UNIENGINE_VALLEY.jpg (212KB, 1320x703px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 1320x703px

>>56189368
I think I did ok.
>1920x1080 test
>2560x1440 test (I run whatever game I play in that resolution)

>>56198708
No idea why that would be. Unless it's something to do with how it interacts with Windows 10 since they're on 7 and 8.

File: valley.png (52KB, 754x446px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 754x446px

>>56192017
lol sli scaling could really be better

>>56199675
So far the only one I know of that uses newer APIs is 3DMark, and they are using DX12

File: 670.png (47KB, 509x454px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 509x454px

>>56199827
replacement 980ti should be here on tues. using my 670 for now.

>>56200186
It's useless at such a low resolution, yeah.

File: valley.png (30KB, 585x544px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 585x544px

>>56198708
>>56200122
Ah shit I figured it out I ran Heaven instead of Valley.

>>56200228
Do you play on 3440x1440 or 4k?

File: uni_valley_bench.png (33KB, 588x644px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 588x644px

Could be better

- EVGA 1080 FTW
- i7 2600k OC to 4.3

>>56200337
4K

File: Thingy.png (31KB, 852x635px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 852x635px

I don't know if I'm doing anything wrong, but this is what I'm getting.

File: benchmarks2014.png (37KB, 616x680px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 616x680px

Is it time to upgrade my R9 270x ?

Not very fast, but I didn't expect much.

File: Screenshot at 2016-08-21 21-01-35.png (4MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2560x1440px

>>56201811
and... I forget the image.

>>56201828
The fuck happened to the image?

>>56201900
OpenGL

>>56201953
I'm pretty sure it was
"Flipping" in nvidia's driver settings.

File: bench.jpg (66KB, 545x454px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 545x454px

cpu running at 4.5ghz
stock 8gb 480

>>56202212
>>56193932

Looking at all of these RX 480's and their low scores makes me glad I got a $300 Nitro Fury.

>>56201900
it's tearing

File: labtop.png (45KB, 789x679px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 789x679px

Few years old gayming laptop.