Is there any reason to actually use Pale Moon?
>>56170657
there is not a single logical reason to use pale moon
>>56170657
A E S T H E T I C
>>56170657
If you're a furry go ahead.
>worksonmymachine!
In all honesty though I'm looking for an alternative for a few reasons, I've hear some folks use waterfox or icecat, anyone have any experiece with either? Or something similar?
>>56170657
No reason
Went from pale moon to Waterfox to icecat then finally back to Firefox because the inherent problems in Mozilla based browsers can't be fixed so I might as well use the one with the best support
>>56170657
No. All Mozilla browsers are the same. Might as well use the one with the most updates and most support.
Better UI and runs well on old computers
>Pale Moon
More like Placebo Meme
>>56170783
Why the FUCK would you use waterfox in 2016?
>>56172245
Why the FUCK wouldn't you use waterfox in 2016?
What do you use, mister?
>>56170657
it's called PaleMeme for a reason
>>56172245
>Why the FUCK would you use waterfox in 2016?
To elicit just this sort of reaction, Mr Predictable.
>>56170657
Doesn't break UI each month with update.
Comes with integrated adblock.
Allows you to enable plugins (flash?) per element with one click.
Comes with enabled optimilisations for current CPU.
Comes in 64bit version since ever.
Doesn't include newest meme technologies like social API which firefox finally dropped few days ago.
Has blue icon instead of furry orange monster.
It is like comparing Debian to Ubuntu to Mint. Each step adds something worthwhile while keeping backwards compatibility.
>>56172712
What about html5 support?
>>56172372
64-bit Firefox