THANK YOU BASED INTEL

Will it finally be worth it to upgrade from my 2500K?

>>56155805
no

>>56155777
Will 7700k be at the price range of 6700k?

>>56155805
Wait for Zen if you want an upgrade.

>>56155818
It will be about $50 more expensive in the first 6 months like always when Intel releases a new CPU generation.

I'm still on a 3770k oc'd to 4,8 fast as heck it is

File: three hundred million dollars.jpg (15KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 480x360px

>based intel

wasted trips

Kaby Lake new features:
>Main10 HEVC decoding with HDMI 2 support in the chipset
>uhh
Thanks Intel for this new iteration of processors. I love this company!

>>56155777
>lga1151
>still no 8 core

>>56155777
7700T seems to be the only interesting CPU on that list.

>5, almost 6 years later, Intel is still only releasing a maximum of 4 cores and 8 threads CPUs

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA

>>56156462
>980x

How does it feel being retarded?

>>56155777
Thanks for CORRECTING THE RECORD.
12 cents have been deposited in your account.

File: 1382624999563.jpg (96KB, 640x427px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 640x427px

>>56155777
>Colck
>Scoket

>>56155777
>still no 4+ core chip

There are phones with more cores

>>56156511
I'd put my colck in ur scoket

>>56156520
more cores doesn't always mean more performance
same with clock speed

>>56156444
>35W
That shits tight. I wonder what its turbo clock will be like, or how well you could overclock it.

>>56156584
if you overclock it you are just going to make it use as much power as the 7700 or 7700k you retard

>>56156605
Surely a 40% clock increase won't result in a 90% power increase.

>>56156693
>>>56156605
>Surely a 40% clock increase won't result in a 90% power increase.
It's not like either use their full TDP. It's called thermal design power. Not constant power consumption.

>>56156693
yes, yes it does
that's why the part with 40% higher clocks has a 90 watt higher tdp
>>56156707
well since turbo boost doesn't actually do anything special with the right cooling, so it's basically a 4.2ghz cpu, and that will almost constantly be at or around the 85-90 watt tdp

>colck
>scoket

File: 1316150383228.png (88KB, 193x200px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 193x200px

>>56157054
Can't believe I didn't notice that.

>>56156482
>$1000
I don't know, tell us.

File: c71.jpg (20KB, 334x393px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 334x393px

>>56157133
>Moving the goalposts

>>56157133

>being retarded
>b-but the price
kill yourself

>>56155852

Why is being able to watch HEVC 4k 60FPS videos a bad thing?

>>56157355
He wants 20% IPC increase.

>>56155777
Looks like someone's worried about Zen

>>56156693
Power usage increases square.
The low TDP dies aren't special, just lower binned chips that clock moderately well at low voltage and low leakage.

>>56156707
>>56156737
They don't use their full TDP under normal load, a good portion of it is there for IGP use as well. Though intel is incredibly generous with chips exceeding TDP greatly for certain periods.
It really should just be called SDP across the board from now on. It is the nominal power draw under the test scenarios that their lab cooked up when trying to simulate every day usage.

>>56157159
>50% more of the same cores
>3 times the price

Really makes you think

>>56155820

Yes and when Zen comes out you buy Intel because Zen will suck monkey balls.

>>56157700
>B-but muh IPC
>Muh cores
>Muh AMD

The only people who won't continue to buy Intel are people stupid enough to not see the fact AMD can't compete with anyone with any of their products.

>>56155968

>2016
>needing 8 cores

:^)

Unironically used carret smiley face.

>>56155777
I still hate how intel made the substrate thinner. I think my 6600K is slightly bent.

>>56157715

>how to spot the underage b&

>>56157883
What kind of mental gymnastics did you need to apply to get to the conclusion that I was underage?

Your inability to refute the fact that AMD has a garbage marketshare in both the GPU and CPU sectors would suggest to me that you're projecting pretty hard there.

>>56157949
He's living in 2005. Times change though.

File: 500x1000px-LL-33a7870d_original.jpg (22KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 500x281px

>>56155805
Aahahahahaha

No...

>>56157355
Last time I checked my GPU could do that in 2011.

>>56157949
CPU share sure.

GPU share I woudn't be quite so sure.

Most people base that on Steam data.

But these guys don't go on steam...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8kua5B5K3I

>>56158100
damn it feels good to be the 2600k overclocked to 4.5GHz masterrace

>>56157949
>zen isn't even out yet and we don't have any real information on its performance but intel will be better believe me guise
>I may not have any proof to support my claims but it isn't totally brand loyaty
>hurr durr marketshare indicates the performance of an unreleased architecture

You are no different than the retards who actually thought that the 480 was going to be a 1070/1080 competitor.

>>56158127
Different guy, but they don't use graphics cards either. It's all custom ASICs now for bitcoin mining.

>>56156507
I think CTR is more for the hired student shitposters who get paid to post on leReddit and FB, etc

>>56158128
I have 2600k stock and see no reason to OC.

This CPU is just gift on giving.

>>56155805
No.

If your shit is overcloclocked, its worthless to upgrade to the newest CPU unless you want DDR4

Inb4 a 35W TDP i7-7700T beats a 225W TDP FX-9590 CPU.

>>56158424
Ethereum

>>56158986
PORTABLE CYBER DECKS WHEN?

>>56158111
Which 2011 gpu can hevc 4k 60fps?

>>56155777
>still 4 cores
>still 95W
>still 8M cache
jewtel at it's best

>>56158100
This is really pathetic, desu.

>>56159201
>complaining about 95W
Skylake is so power efficient it's not even funny.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbQEDaFwFxM

>>56159200

also 10bit

>>56159200
None. That anon is a retard. With a GPU that old you better hope your CPU can handle the software decoding.

>>56155805
Absolutely. Look at the gains from new memory also!

http://www.overclock.net/t/1578480/i5-2500k-4-5ghz-vs-6700k-4-5ghz-in-games

When do you think the 7700k will be released?

>>56160501
>better hope your CPU can handle the software decoding.

If you have a 4790k overclocked to 4.5GHz it uses around 80% CPU usage solid.

So yeah, 6700k probably would fair a bit better, but having hardware decoding really helps.

When using the hardware decoding of my GTX 960 it brings my CPU use down to 2% during the same 4K video, and i pull about 40w less from the wall so a decent bit of power savings

>>56160621
A few weeks before Black Friday if they aren't fully retarded.

>>56158100
>muh gaming performance
Might as well have compared the capacity of a 4 TB drive and wondered why that didn't go up with processor generations.