WOW WHAT A DISAPPOINTMENT

File: laughing-girls.jpg (37KB, 540x360px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 540x360px

>>56134670
>can't even beat a 950

It's slower than my 270X lol

470 looks pretty nice.

you know i think they might've fucked up how much shit they pulled off this card, the 470 is a god compared to it.

Can we see the rest of the benches?

>>56134933
Well that depends on price. The 750Ti still goes for 130 bucks for me. If this costs 130 dollars, that's not a bad deal. Not sure I want it tho. I do need a gfx card in that performance category though.

File: r_600x450 (4).png (129KB, 600x450px)

129KB, 600x450px

>>56134946
;-)

File: r_600x450 (5).png (120KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 600x450px

>>56134970
>>56134946

>Make blatant bait thread
>/g/ takes it and doesn't even look back

go back to /v/ you degenerates.

>>56135006
>graphics cards aren't technology

it's literally on par with the 750ti, amdrones were hyping this as a gtx960 killer.

at least we're going to get this in the zen APUs which is pretty good performance for an igpu, but we already know zen is trash compared to even sandy vagina and that the perf/watt issues will kill AMD.

>>56135170
If this is in an APU it would be a killer steam machine, but that depends how they price it.

I'll only buy zen APUs if they're as good value as an a8 7600, 7650k, or a10 7800.

>>56134670
>>56134733
>>56134970
>>56134977


>mfw i was looking to get the 460 as a 7790 owner

thanks /g/ now i can get the 470

AMD is poo

b-but vulkan guys

GUYS

>>56135283
>4k gaming on a laptop is now possible
Fuck, that's awesome.
How chunky though, my friends 4 year old m18x is so thicc it doesn't deserve to be called a laptop.

Also, how expensive?
I'll probably buy one if it doesn't rape my wallet

So it's a 750ti by AMD?

>>56135421
>1080p
Got anything in 1440p?

Not fussed with aesthetics as long as the os doesn't have a disgusting skin like alienwares

>>56135424
Yep!
ONLY TWO YEARS LATE.

>>56135463
>limited to 1080p or 4k
:(

>>56134965
The 460 is going as low as $115 on newegg

>>56134670
>Just marginally outperforms a 750ti

Wow

>>56135333
>How chunky though

You can get a 1060 in a Razor Blade, which is slim as fuck.

Does AMD even laptop anymore?

>>56135791
Still making APU's

>>56134965
>>56135675
270's were $100 a year ago, so neither is very good.

>>56135830
Can you not get used 7870s for 70 dollars anymore?

>>56135859
That too.

>>56134930
I have a 470. Its better than my old 960 but its only noticeable in games that use more than 2gb of vram.

>>56135929
>going from a 960 to a 470
...

>arguing over graphics cards

my favorite is the Intel-brand integrated graphics processor

your favorite is inferior because it can actually be used to play video games

>>56135170
does there really need to be a '960 killer'? It was an uninteresting mid range card that surprised no one when it came out and now it's an outdated one to boot.

>>56135791
They're going into new MacBook pros which is all you need to know about their performance. It will be funny when Oculus still refuses to support the new MBPs

File: gtav.png (143KB, 601x1419px)

143KB, 601x1419px

>>56135999
So can the Intel, jajajajaja

>>56135999

Actually, the iGPU found on Skylake is pretty decent and can run a lot of new games (on low settings obviously).

So its basically just a slightly better 750ti while being slightly more expensive. What's the point then?

>>56135999
>iGPU
N-no thanks. I used to live with that cuckery for years, never again.

>>56136013
>jajajajaja
I don't know what nordic country this is from, but it's fucking annoying.

>>56136013
what the fuck /g/ told me those AMD a10 7850K CPUs were good.

>>56135283
Nvidia went full software emulation.

They're gonna have a bad time when dx12 hits in full. Everything before pascal will be obsoletes whereas everyone with an AMD gpu will be fine.

>>56136342
Always do the opposite of what g says

>>56136342
How much did you spend on it?

7600k/7650k are in a very, very narrow window of acceptability. 7850k... usually not.

>>56136342
>anything AMD
>good

TOP KEK

>>56135424
except that it has 10 more fps on average and costs about $20 less.

I'm not buying it since I've got a 970, but whats with all the complaining when it outperforms other cards in the same price range?

>>56136793
The card in the op is the strix and consumes 30w more than a 460/750ti would.

>>56134670
>tomshardon4novidia
>>56134837
It's a EVGA GeForce GTX 950 FTW Gaming ACX 2.0

>>56137070
And that's a strix 460.

>>56134670
No wonder nvidia keeps winning

>>56137118
Ikr

>>56136245
Unless you're implying that the poster is white, the jajajaja you're referring to is hispanic in origin

File: datpedoniggathatfuckswillsmith.jpg (60KB, 578x540px)

60KB, 578x540px

>>56136815
>Caring about power draw in a desktop

>>56139442
>his parents still pay the bills
Must be nice being underage

>>56139455
>being on welfare

File: amd.png (42KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 653x726px

>>56134670
>>56134733
DELET

>>56136443
>muh async compute

Give this meme a rest

>>56139533
Current AMD cards will be better for sure somewhere in the future. I believe it.

Leaning towards getting a 470 at the moment, seems a really good bang/buck card.

>>56139455
if you can't offord the electricity your computer uses then you are too poor to own one

>>56139455

If an extra power draw of 30 watts, when gaming, is something your financially concerned about then you probably shouldnt be buying dedicated gpus in the first place.

>>56134733
>can't even break 60fps in WoW
>a 20 year old game

pathetic

>>56139559
>Current AMD cards will be better for sure somewhere in the future. I believe it.

This shit happens with every new dx version

There is some feature introduced where one maker has a nice lead over another. Fanboys make a big deal of it and act like this guarantees that nv/amd will be the superior choice because of it.

In the end developers make games for as large of a market as possible, and because of this they wont heavily rely on something that is significantly slower on one makers cards.

So outside of a few games that will make heavy use of async for whatever reason, it wont make any difference.

>>56139633
This
It's like nobody remembers all the dx11 stuff nobody even cares about.

>>56134670
>less than 5fps more than 6870
>6870 is a literal rebrand of the 5870
>7790 performs worse than the 6870 on average
>not even mentioning the fact that 5fps is within the relm of inaccuracy error by fps counters
here i thought this new generation of gpus was finaly worth upgrading too.
wrong.. hopefully next gen will have price:performance comparable to the 6870.
but that's likely just wishful thinking considering all these companies want to do now is release rebrand after rebranded rebrands only to rebrand that too.

>>56139633
Speaking of marketshare, AMD has the
C O N S O L E S
O
N
S
O
L
E
S

>>56136245
could be swedish, though, too

>>56137087
so an even shittier anus version
yeah what a disappointment

>>56139603
He didn't say 30w, he said power draw.

Funnily enough though, I do care about power consumption so I went with a 1070 and i3 6100

>>56134733
WoW is CPU heavy game. You can easily get it to 100+ fps with old shitty gpu and a good intel cpu

>>56139973
aren't i3s still dual core?
lmao 2016, trying to game on a dual core

>>56139716
They get literally nothing from them. Meanwhile nvidia owns the gpgpu market where the money are.

>>56140035
(you)

File: maxresdefault (15).jpg (358KB, 1920x1080px)

358KB, 1920x1080px

>>56140020
>trying
Better than those quad core Sandy bridge you poor fucks like to brag about

File: r_600x450 (1).png (124KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 600x450px

>750ti launches
>less performance than HD 7850 for same price
>only 20% better than massively cheaper 650ti
>Daily Nvidia shill threads praising it as the best thing since sliced bread

>RX 460 launches
>10-30% faster than 750ti in DX11 titles
>60-80% faster than 750ti in DX12 titles
>same price
>Nvidia shills pretend it's not the best low budget card launched in years

File: amd2.jpg (52KB, 568x612px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 568x612px

>>56140061

>>56139633
I know what you are saying, but async compute is slightly different. It gets used in consoles all the time, so developing to make use of async compute DOES capture the biggest part of the market, which is console users.

>>56140142
>pc ports run better on amd because consoles use amd meme
Benchmarks tell another story.

>>56139568
470 is the best bang for the buck card on the market hands down.

>>56140209
Agreeable

Planning on replacing my 960 for that, putting the 960 to my second pc

>>56139455
30W moar = 12p more electricity every 34hrs of full load computing. Say you ame 16hrs/day like the neet that you are that would mean an extra £20 per year!!!
What a guzzler right

>>56140287
960 is better isn't it?
unless you require 4 times the ram

File: 1436751623884.png (1MB, 1258x818px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1258x818px

>>56140287
>replacing 960 for 470

>>56139624
not that I disagree about the sentiment, it really should be able to max out something like that. but seriously?
>20 years
>rounding up 8 years
>not down 2

>>56140119
>750ti even relevant anymore

It's overlooked because the power users see it as a very weak option
Though it's very good for it's value, i'd rather get the 470

>>56139839
no it couldn't

>>56140395
Yes it couldn't

>>56139633
>In the end developers make games for as large of a market as possible, and because of this they wont heavily rely on something that is significantly slower on one makers cards.
You mean like Goyimworks and tessellation out of the ass?

>>56140302
it's slower and less vram, yes

Benchmarks about half faster than a 960

>>56140322
don't worry m8 I'll round up your IQ from 12 to 20

>>56139624
>vanilla wow max settings on RX 460
>300 FPS

>wod max settings on RX 460
>30 FPS

RX 460 would be an excellent card if it was $50

>>56140453
The fuck is goyimworks?

>>56140166
That's what I said anon, read again you mongoloid

>>56139624
>its the GPUs fault that a horribly optimized shitshow of a game runs badly
>doesn't know WoW is CPU heavy
Kill yourself

Yeah the 460 is ass
Why AMD released it is a fucking mystery, it's garbage.

Oh wait, AMD.

the 470 is nice though

>>56136013
Fucking spic

>>56141362
470 Is The only AMD card worth buying right now.

Waiting for the GTX 1050 to finally finish AMD.

File: 1456591795524.png (289KB, 1200x600px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 1200x600px

>>56136342
They are. Intel graphics drivers are so bad excessive crashing and games not even starting is common. Also these are far older and cheaper than the i7 6700k. AMD's APUs are severely bandwidth limited.

>>56136245
хaхaхaххaхaхaхaхaхa CУКA

>>56141911
Stupid weaboo, kys

>USING FUCKING OC'D CARDS TO COMPARE CUSTOM REFERENCE CARDS
WHY WON'T YOU ALL FUCKING DIE

>>56136793
You can actually undervolt the 460 and still have it perform better than a 750ti while consuming less power.

File: 1459154937321.jpg (120KB, 626x348px)

120KB, 626x348px

>>56139715
>6870 is a literal rebrand of the 5870

>>56140969
Your new is showing, familia
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nvidia_GameWorks

File: 1469895368013.jpg (56KB, 600x338px)

56KB, 600x338px

>>56142066
>goyimworks
>gameworks
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA YOU'RE SO FUCKING RETARDED HAHAHAHAHAHA

>>56140288
Flippancy aside do that calculation with a Sapphire Nitro. It's what put me off since I'd be using it around 3 hours a day.

That and in the UK the AMD offerings are overpriced.

>>56134837
It's cheaper than a 950. Cheaper than a 950 a year after launch in fact. And it generally matches Asus' 75W slot-powered 950 almost exactly in terms of performance. Only so much you can do in that power envelope, and both AMD and Nvidia have reached the limit of it.

>AMD: we want the "I should be spending this money on food instead" demographic

>>56140071
>2500K
>no overclock
fuck this video

>>56143919
I'm a stingy sod and AMD have missed the boat completely by having too many similar SKU's

4/8 gb 470's at £180- £220 4/8 gb 480's at 200- 260.

What's the point if in the majority of DX 12 games they don't absolutely cane 1060's unless in AMD optimised games?

More expensive, warmer, louder and less reputable AIB partners.

>>56143962
I'm also a stingy sod and I went with a 1070 because I'm tired of spending less money and having to upgrade sooner.

>Needing more than classic PAL standard 25FPS

>>56143999
£400 is too decadent for me. I could do it and pondered about importing one from EVGA for £360 due to international warranty . I'm sure it'd get taxed though even if my friend sends one.

>>56136342
They are good for the price. The Intel CPU next to it is more than twice as much in cost for a 23% (15f fps) performance increase.

>>56140311
twice the performance

>>56134670
>>56134733
>>56134970
>>56134977
>released as an esport card
>literally only for playing 1024x768 and low settings
>people wonder why it doesn't perform on 1080p
wew

>>56144110
>MSRP $379
>actual price is $540
price drop when

>>56144657
>released as an esport card
that means LoL, DotA, CS:GO and Overwatch at 1080p max settings
this card does not offer this

>>56144687
>that means LoL, DotA, CS:GO and Overwatch at 1080p max settings
noone who plays those games seriously does it on max settings

>>56144675
when nvidia moves to samsung to improve yeilds

>>56144675
Even adding tax and a bit of a transit fee they are taking the piss in the UK. I'm still not sure to spend £360 on a graphics card if if I could get away with importing one.

RX 480 was a washout over here unless you want 4gb and only at OC does it even compete with the much cheaper and cooler 1060's.

After looking at a video comparing lesser AMD/ Nvidia equivalents they don't really age better unless you get into fury territory, even the 90 series didn't pull ahead much.

>>56144723
Yeah, actually most people do

>>56144758
source?

>>56144785
Any LoL, Dota or Overwatch stream that exists.

It's not like you have a source that says people play with low settings

>>56144758
>>56144785
soure: me
I play these games at max settings at 1080p (although 144hz)

>>56144813
Not him but for a lot of FPS games it'd make sense to play on the lowest settings possible to get the highest framerate you can.

File: 1467730580392.png (110KB, 286x217px)

110KB, 286x217px

>>56144813
>Any LoL, Dota or Overwatch stream that exists
>>56144819
>soure: me

lmao just check for actual pro settings you fucking retards

>>56144864
Do you really think AMD released a card for the 0.1% top players of those games?

>>56144888
Wouldn't be the first stupid decision AMD has made

>>56144864
>actual pro settings
why would pro players play at medium?
huuhh????

>>56144864
I said Lol, Dota and Overwatch, not CSGO.

File: 1467730697291.jpg (253KB, 1080x1283px)

253KB, 1080x1283px

>>56144951
>stream

>>56144989
You're the one who wanted pro players

>video games are important

>>56145002
you certainly don't watch any pro streams if you say they play on max settings

File: nep kek.jpg (97KB, 480x604px)

97KB, 480x604px

>>56134733
>>56134670
rx 460 is losing to a $75 r9 270

>>56145002
Half pro cs players play with setting on lowest with 4:3 800p or some shit. Screen effects just make shit harder to see. They want the game to look as simple as possible.

>>56143827
It's actually the same price as a 950 and way slower.

AMD is so fucking retarded.

>>56146413
>It's actually the same price as a 950 and way slower.
no it isnt retard

>>56146438
Uhh yes it is.

File: r_600x450 (1).png (132KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 600x450px

>>56146492
can mongoloids like you go back to /v/
>>>/v/

File: untitled-21.png (38KB, 681x802px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 681x802px

>>56146492
gee didnt know that the 950 was faster than the 960

File: loool.jpg (34KB, 448x601px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 448x601px

>>56146532
>>56146588
>hitman dx12
>TWWH

who the fuck cares? whats next, AotS?

>>56134670
>>56134733
How is it possible a brand new budget card is losing to a fucking GTX 950 by a mile?

File: 1470846608763.jpg (33KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 400x400px

>>56146752
Because AMD.

>>56146744
>WAHHHH MY CARD LOSES IN THIS GAME ITS NOT A VALID BENCHMARK

File: 1471006318398.jpg (235KB, 866x1300px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 866x1300px

>>56146787
>>56146744

File: lmao.png (671KB, 1080x811px) Image search: [Google]

671KB, 1080x811px

>>56146794
Give me benchmarks for relevant games, like Fallout or Witcher, no shit everyone can run anyways
>>56146830
>he fell for the AMD meme

>>56146883
>Fallout
gaymeworks on a 15 year old engine

>Witcher
game for aspies and also has gaymeworks

File: 1466711351697.jpg (92KB, 612x612px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 612x612px

>>56146744
Makes a lot of sense that a product should only run the games that you like.

File: 2016-08-18_14h25_34.png (6KB, 543x241px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 543x241px

>>56146883
here but witcher is still not a valid benchmark because of gamedontworks

>>56144657
It costs more than a 960...

File: 1457293195161.jpg (48KB, 243x290px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 243x290px

>>56148915
Your full of shit

Cheapest new GTX 960 on newegg $169.99
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814133627&cm_re=960-_-14-133-627-_-Product

Cheapest new RX 460 on newegg $114.99
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814131695&cm_re=rx_460-_-14-131-695-_-Product

>>56149444
HaHa nice digits.

They're the same price here tho.

https://www.mwave.com.au/product/sapphire-amd-radeon-rx-460-nitro-4gb-video-card-ab85704

https://www.mwave.com.au/product/msi-geforce-gtx-960-2gb-oc-video-card-ab61352

>>56149514
>shitpostland
who cares

File: 1457412212451.gif (392KB, 490x275px) Image search: [Google]

392KB, 490x275px

>>56149514
>Austalia

>>56146787
Lol AMD is so retarded I almost feel bad for them.

>>56149554
Better than Americuck in every single way

>>56134670
So how much is it? If it has 750ti performance it shouldn't cost more than 150 bucks.

>>56149600
>being underage

>>56149609
Its $110 and it has 950 performance in the worst case scenarios

B-BUT
LE ESPORTS CARD XD
US GAMERS HUH

>>56149629
sounds great actually

>>56149606
Doesn't make AU relevant. Your country has a population lower than Texas.

>>56149609
115-150bux
so you were spot on.

>>56135697
It was slated to have 16 CU's I think. Power draw must have been too high for 16 so it had to be cut back to 14.

>>56149869
RX 465 probably

File: IMG_20160804_091347_HDR.jpg (2MB, 3120x4160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3120x4160px

>>56149656
Lower population density = much nicer to live in

Enjoy no parks and bushwalks americuck

File: 1457015558156.png (214KB, 600x452px) Image search: [Google]

214KB, 600x452px

>>56150044
I have cows for neighbors m8.

>>56135424
Zen is a Haswell but only 3 years late
rx480 is a gtx 970 but only 2 years late
rx460 is a 750ti but only 2 years late

AMD- Years behind the competition

File: flying_spider-640x336.jpg (56KB, 640x336px)

56KB, 640x336px

>>56150044
>flying killer spiders population is higher than humans
eh I'll pass
Europe is a nicer place anyways

>>56144939
Some SC2 pros play at the lowest possible graphics setting. Fuck if I know why, but they say it gives them an edge.

>>56150044
>muh outdoors
Australia is literally 90% desert

>>56150171
Beautiful desert too

File: 1457552109016s.jpg (8KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 250x250px

>>56144939
Pro players tend to play at the lowest possible settings. In all the games i have played competitively the community has even written custom graphics configs to get the settings even lower than what the game menus would normally allow.

File: 1256583290901.jpg (179KB, 576x432px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 576x432px

>>56150142
>flying spiders

>>56150585
Stupid weaboo

>>56141330
>same CPU, different GPU
>different FPS
>IT'S THE CPU'S FAULT

Haha, calm down kiddo. Your ignorance is showing.

File: aa9334c3d90bcd6de0eea02ac748c2e0.png (151KB, 449x442px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 449x442px

>>56150686
That is Mr.Stupid Weaboo to you cunt.

>>56150687
STOP IT

>>56150585
but why

>>56150802
To reduce visual noise and maintain a steady 150+ FPS.

>>56136271
care for tissues?