Post em
7-Zip -> Tools -> Benchmark
>>56132032
Im waiting for my new 2011-3 8 core xeon build :)
>>56132067
nice, i'm watching a 1080p stream and uploading a backup to a remote server in the background using 10-15% CPU usage, so my benchmark wasn't the greatest example anyway.
>>56132119
i guess with nothing in the background you easily get atleast 4k MIPS on Rating/Usage
>>56132170
4k would probably require me to boost my OC up to 4.6-4.7GHz which I could do, but prefer not to for temp reasons.
Eh, not too bad.
>>56133545
>>56133591
You can easily OC that shit to at least 3.4ghz
> Windows
>>56133545
>>56133565
>>56133591
>thread title
>7-Zip Benchmark
>OP post
>Post em
>7-Zip -> Tools -> Benchmark
you know you're supposed to be posting 7-zip, not just CPU-z?
>>56133725
>> Windows
retard it's 7zip
>>56133244
>>56133747
meh
How is this?
stock 2600k, still too lazy to OC
>>56131938
>not using lrzip
>>56131938
Xeon E5 2658v3 reporting for dutty
8350
>>56134251
I have the same CPU. Although it's not the E5-2658v3. It's a QEYP ES.
>>56134843
Is almost (but not) the same
Still the performance is rock solid for a ES CPU, and was dirt cheap
>>56135038
It's more similar to the E5-2650L v3. Both in terms of clock rates and TDP. Doesn't really have a model number though. I believe it was used for pre-production microcode testing.
>>56133725
i7 920 @ 2.66
>>56136105
>@ 2.66
...but why?
>>56136333
>...but why?
it's summer