/wt/ watch thread

File: New-2015-Sea-Gull-skeleton-watch-automatic-watches-men-women-original-Sea-Gull-ladies-wrist-watch.jpg (45KB, 640x426px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 640x426px

what does /wt/ think of seagull?

File: Screen Shot 2016-08-14 at 5.14.15 PM.png (1MB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x800px

What timepiece is Antonov wearing?

>>56082083
Do those tiny dots actually do anything?

>>56082516
The lume dots? They glow, duh. Use your eyes m8.

What's your favorite Seiko under $500?
No Seiko 5, please.

>>56082545
You don't say dipshit. I'm asking whether lume dots that tiny make a difference at all.

File: SI-035.jpg (114KB, 768x577px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 768x577px

Shall we continue the Sinn fight ITT?

File: IMG_8995.jpg (1MB, 2816x2112px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2816x2112px

>>56082452
Most of their watches are ugly. Looks aside they make decent mechanical movements with hacking/handwind and other features. ST2130 is a direct clone of 2824 as well but much cheaper. Their watches are meh, but their movements are very good value for price.

>>56082585
Are you asking for advice? Because my favourite Seiko under $500 is a Seiko 5.

>>56082595
A difference with what? You see them in the dark.

>>56082595
They glow so it's easier to read what hour/minute the hands are pointing at when there's no light. What else would they do?

File: SRP309K1-3.jpg (173KB, 450x600px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 450x600px

>>56082585
The new version of this with 4R15.

>>56082585

Orange Monster

>>56082595
yeah they will be clearly visible in the dark for an hour ish

>>56082685
ETA are overpriced, and the 2824 is just a modernized 70's movement, but that chink clone is rough as fuck. Also I see dirt specs, not a good sign if that is a factory photo.

>>56082718
>>56082736
Holy shit, do you people have autism? They're tiny. Less lume = less light = worse legibility. Do I really have to spell it out this much? DO THOSE TINY DOTS WORK IRL?
OR
IS
THAT
TINY
AMOUNT
NOT
BRIGHT
ENOUGH
?

>>56082791
Thank you.

>>56082803
Do you think they would put lume dots that can't be seen on a watch?

>>56082803
>Also I see dirt specs, not a good sign if that is a factory photo.
Not a factory photo, just an old one lying around. The seagull is a bit rougher than a real 2824 but overall pretty acceptable. There are other asian clones of the 2824 though and the Seagull one is by far the best.

http://watchguy.co.uk/comparison-sea-gull-st2130-eta-2824-2-peacock-sl3000/

>>56082812
Yes, if it's shit lume, or they know a lume-less watch would sell less.

>>56082843
no
you were the stupid one all along anon

>>56082888
>watch manufacturers don't pull pointless bullshit on their models all the time, even "MUH NIPPON FOLDED A THOUSAND TIMES 316L TAMAHAGANE HAUTE HOROLOGY" companies
Boy, you're a fucking desperate idiot, just stop posting already.

>>56082778
new one has 4R36 not 4R15

File: SBDC023.jpg (204KB, 1200x891px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 1200x891px

>>56082974

He might have meant 6R15. There are Monster variants that have the 6R15 movement, SBDC025 and SBDC023.

Valjoux 7750. Opinions?

>>56083182
Workhorse "tractor" movement. Works great but bulky as fuck. Hand wind mechanism also wears out the gears and eventually requires service so if you have one, try to keep it running from automatic winding. Most watches with it are pretty thick.

>>56083357

Thanks

File: ZvQSgq3.jpg (502KB, 1224x1632px) Image search: [Google]

502KB, 1224x1632px

RIP citizen automatics. This watch now discontinued.

>>56082630
There is no fight. We established last thread that Sinns are macfag watches.

>>56082803
>ETA are overpriced, and the 2824 is just a modernized 70's movement

Yes, because three of the best volume produced automatic movements of all time were'nt developed in the 1970s before the quartz revolution, after which everyone stopped giving the slightest fuck about functional mechanical movement design.

Go look up the Omega 56x/75x, ETA 2892 and Seiko 52xx you ignorant horological peasant.

>>56082824
I have with my own eyes seem a chink 2824 that was indistinguishable from a swiss one, that was sitting right next to it.
It depends on how much effort they go through

>>56082083
Thinking about getting one of these next, maybe the sexy carbon fiber one instead.

Does this sound right?

Hallo, wanneer is dit horloge geproduceerd ?

File: tumblr_inline_nlqlthlWGA1rfxdzc_500[1].png (60KB, 500x407px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 500x407px

>I will never own a collection as impressive as lawyer's
>it is the one true dream that keeps popping into my apatic mind
Why live /g/?

>>56085328

If it means anything, he has a very average sized penis. Completely average.

>>56085410
How'd you know??

Trying to find a black 37-40mm Timex Weekender Fairfield

Do they only produce that in 41mm? I don't want the face to be as big as my damn wrist.

>>56085328
Post his collection

>>56082778
>>56083072
>>56083514
Disgusting

>>56082630
7

>>56082452
5

>>56082083
8

File: 14022079_10153840195752205_5624279555094150857_n.jpg (44KB, 540x960px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 540x960px

I win this for $30 including shipping..

is it okay guys??

>>56086278
Very nice deal, especially for the twin quartz movement.

File: 1470947090244.webm (3MB, 704x396px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 704x396px

>>56086278

File: Screenshot_20160814-230325.png (2MB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1440x2560px

-_-

>>56085024

Shit, fucking Google


What about this


Wann wurde diese Uhr produziert ?

>>56086413
I know this guy from malaysia sell genuine seiko vintage for a while...

this guy is reputable seller

>>56086278
I sure as hell wouldn't complain about paying $30 for that

>>56086278
Post a picture of the movement

>>56086661
I just win it from auction in facebook..
tomorrow he post it..

but I already buy from him 3 times before this... all genuine not redial and refurbished like from india

>>56086440
Can anyone identify which model this is?

Do you think it's worth spending a lot of money upgrading cheap watches? I'm hesitant to get a Super Engineer, which costs $80, for a Ray that I got for $120.

File: ARSHEEE.jpg (26KB, 497x473px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 497x473px

>>56082452

>>56086140
He has never posted his whole collection in a single pic, but what he has posted easily reaches the 200k dollars mark.

He hasn't been here recently, though.

>>56087190
You think that's bad? I have one on my PW-3001 which cost only $28. It's not like you can't use it on a different watch some day.

File: bentleybreit.jpg (221KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 1000x667px

is fossil quality decent for the money?

>>56083528
Except that:

>Sinn make among the hardest cases in the industry
>Sinn make great efforts to increase longevity, by eliminating moisture in their cases, and reducing the need for lubricants with Diapal
>Sinn make their advances in technology available, instead of flaunting them in prototypes

So you, and that Steinhart shill, can fuck right off. Sinn are not another company simply slotting ETA movements into good-looking cases, they're a serious engineering firm who invest heavily in development.

>>56087305
sinns look like absolute garbage

>>56082812
>Do you think they would put lume dots that can't be seen on a watch?
I have lumed watches that I cannot read in the dark.

There's a reason why ISO diver certification demands "legibility at 30cm in total darkness", and not "HAZ LOOM DOTS". Small dots of lume are not legible in total darkness because your eyes are constantly altering their focal length.

File: nick-young-confused-face-300x256_nqlyaa.jpg (25KB, 600x512px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 600x512px

>>56086858
>Auction in facebook

I am for the first time looking to get myself a nice watch.

Victorinox 241493

Is this one of the best I can get for the price?

>>56087283
In short : no

>>56087414
English is clearly not that guys first language, leave him alone we all know what he meant.

File: tmp_19552-Mulliner-Tourbillon-by-Breitling-clock-31480255505.jpg (220KB, 1600x1067px) Image search: [Google]

220KB, 1600x1067px

Why don't you own a tourbillon on your car /g/?

>>56087546
If anyone tried to bring something breitling in my car I'd kick them out

>>56087367
I thought that not long ago, but they've grown on me.

>>56087546
Mechanical clock.
In a vehicle that may not be driven for days at a time.
What's the power reserve on that piece of shit?

>>56087224
Post some of the pics, then.

>>56087450
Whats the price?

>>56087845
It's electronic the rotor is magnetic around the edges, and is spun using small electrical pulses sent from the 24V battery. The clock itself cost $3000 to build, which is kinda ridiculous since most cars cost like $50-$100k.

>>56087546
That would actually be kinda sexy if it weren't for those inlaid diamonds. Makes it look so tacky.

>>56087959
That is a joke surely.
"Hey guys let's take this generic eta movement and add a magnet around the outside of the rotor"
$3000 later......
You glorious swiss pretending to be english bastards.
Bet that's the top seller keeping sheitling afloat.

>>56088020
They are swarovski crystals if those were real diamonds the car would cost 10 million instead of only 5 million. Brietling did this to reduce the price so people can afford it.

>>56082585
SRP777K1

>>56088041
>if those were real diamonds the car would cost 10 million instead of only 5 million

Diamonds don't work like that.

>>56088041
Good that Breitlinshit thinks of the poor peasants. Very nice of them.

File: 1471011839857.jpg (43KB, 585x720px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 585x720px

You fuckers need to realize that there is no watch on THIS PLANET that beats a Seiko diver for price, quality, durability & repairability. Anyone who thinks otherwise is just a deluded fuck, brainwashed by other deluded fucks. Hence, the opinions of you deluded fucks is not important. Have a nice day.

>>56088529
Vostok diver beats a Seiko diver at the same price simply because Seiko don't make divers that cheap
Checkm8 nigger

>>56088529
>repairability

My local watchmaker wanted to charge $125 to service my SKX007. That's about 60% of what I payed to buy the watch initially. Fuck that I'm just going to wear it until it stops working and toss it.

>>56088583
>Vostok
>ISO Diver Certified
pick one

>>56088604
you got ripped off m8. don't just hand money to the first guy you see.

>>56088613
>you got ripped off m8. don't just hand money to the first guy you see.

I didn't actually go through with it. Also he's the only one in my area so I either have to go with him or ship it off to somebody which I can't imagine would be any cheaper.

File: IMG_20160815_121009138.jpg (3MB, 2592x4608px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2592x4608px

Your good friend from India ,Aditya has lost weight.

>>56088529
>being this loyal to a brand
It seems the brainwashed deluded fuck here is you.

File: IMG_20160815_121637333.jpg (2MB, 2592x4608px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2592x4608px

Mudman on an Indian wrist :^) meme potential supreme.

>>56088629
Don't listen to him $125 is the standard rate.

http://www.motorcitywatchworks.com/Services.html

In retrospect Rolex just charged me $500 to do a complete maintenance including a new mainspring and COSC calibration. Although they did polish the light scratch They didn't even replace the bezel/crystal with a scratch running through them. Consider yourself lucky. Look at this thing, its like a new watch! Don't mind the Seikos...

>>56088529
The last Seiko diver I bought (a "J" model, btw) had misaligned hands that were so bad that I had to send it off to get fixed.

>>56088651
>>56088716
What's the poo resistance on these?

Congrats on the weight loss, btw.

What's a good band for water contact?

So sick of taking my watch off to wash my hands and shit like that.
Currently have a leather dress band, which shouldn't touch water, and a nylon NATO that gets wet for about 30 mins after contact.

>>56088772
About 50 designations :p and thanks.

>>56088782
Unless you're a doctor or working with food, you can generally just wash your hands and not go up onto your wrists.

Rubber or metal

File: 1.jpg (266KB, 1024x1365px) Image search: [Google]

266KB, 1024x1365px

Is your body ready for tomorrow guys?

>>56088916
what's special about tomorrow?

>>56088952
V2 of this watch is released. Only $330, the movement is kinda shit though. And its made in China but it looks cool right?

File: black-balaur-nice-360x480.jpg (56KB, 360x480px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 360x480px

>>56088966
I've been out of the micro diver game to not know what that particular watch is but I guess it looks nice enough for $330. Not a fan of the 6 o'clock date, though. In the world of micros I'm probably more excited by the Aevig Balaur, not sure if I'm going to actually order one since I'd prefer the internal bezel to be minutes and not hours.

>>56088966
>the movement is kinda shit though

I own a watch with the same movement and it's fine. Obviously a 6R15 or Miyota 9015 would be nicer but they would also jack the price up more.

>>56089042
Helm Vanatu version 2

>>56088782
Hirsch, DiModell, and other higher-end brands offer "sport" or "performance" water-resistant leather straps in the neighborhood of $40 and up.

Luminox and Tag Heuer I have. But Nomos or A. Lange & Söhne would be the 2 I would like

Recently got a SARB017 Alpinist, did i make a good choice?

File: 20160628_135517.jpg (4MB, 2273x2352px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2273x2352px

>>56087367
Meanie!

File: sarb017nato.jpg (43KB, 459x816px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 459x816px

>>56089136
Replace the strap and you've got a 10/10 watch. Don't listen to any pleb saying otherwise.

File: Spiegel-05.jpg (277KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

277KB, 800x600px

>>56089196
>acrylic crystal not sapphire
superior pilots Chrono coming through and at less than half the price.

>>56089077
>but they would also jack the price up more.
How can Obris manage to not do it then?

>>56089202
Thanks, looking at something similar to your pic, maybe a leather one

File: P_20160119_110449.jpg (100KB, 431x553px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 431x553px

>>56089136
>>56089202
Agreed but do NOT change it to the Bond strap pictured above. Those only look good on dive watches or Speedmasters, i.e. watches with prominent dark bezels. Stick with solid black, khaki, or leather, imo.

>>56089253
The Aquos is already a thousand dollars, this watch is $250-$275.

How do you guys define if a movement is good or not?
I'm new to this so my best shot is that is based on something like how many seconds lose-gain per day and how much time it last without winding it. Right?

File: SARB017-02.jpg (1MB, 3264x1952px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x1952px

>>56089267
Or proper metal bracelet.

>>56089268
What? The Explorer is 270 and has a 9015.

>>56089272
BPH is also a good indicator, you want around 28800 BPH for a smooth seconds hand. The Seiko Spring Drive is like 56k+ BPH.

>>56082083
Is anyone able to recommend a black, utilitarian style watch for military use?

>>56089282
The Explorer I/II is sold out forever due to the 9015 shortage, I plan on owning both as sell as a Sumo.

>>56089277
Where to order good cheap metal bracelets?

>>56089303
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRvNr1E93aQ

File: Screenshot_20160815-180636.jpg (675KB, 1419x1490px) Image search: [Google]

675KB, 1419x1490px

>>56089267
Thoughts on pic related?

>>56089299
Isn't it coming out again this year?
Also that's beyond the point. They can sell a watch with a 9015 for $270.

>>56089324
The reason they are OOS is because there is a shortage of 9015.

>>56089356
Again.
Your point?

>>56088727
You got off lucky i paid about $2000.
But it was a heavy rebuild rather than a simple service

>>56089376
What the hell did you do to it?

>>56089316
Should work. Especially considering that the Alpinist is a field/mountaineering watch.

File: IMG_20160815_092946741_HDR~01.jpg (152KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 1024x768px

Casio best watches for poor people

>>56089285
that's not how spring drive works.

File: 20160530_084446.jpg (1MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x1836px

>>56089289

>>56089289
dw5600

File: 15180OR.OO_.A002CR.01_02.jpg (67KB, 600x449px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 600x449px

>>56089285

The frequency that a movement runs at doesn't really have anything to do with the quality of the movement. Some of the best watch companies in the world produce movements that run at less than 28,800 BPH.

File: 20160716_122548.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

>>56089389
I bought it from a fellow diver, I'm second owner, the watch had a hard life over the 20 odd years before i bought it.
Had to replace the case because it had some nasty gouges.
Also first service for the watch so there were a few worn parts.
Dial was perfect and no leaks, once it was serviced completely i bought a NOS case and bracelet I got a deal on and had the crystal replaced.
Rolex was kind enough to assist with it all and gave me re issue certificate when they put the serial on the new case.
The watch had a adventurous life and i plan to keep up the tradition
$2500 and i got a -2 sec per day rolex that i can use as my dive/adventure watch

File: Screenshot_2016-08-15-16-08-39.png (983KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

983KB, 1080x1920px

>>56087414

>>56089673
How the fuck do you pronounce dgn?

File: FullSizeRender (3).jpg (1MB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2448x3264px

eyy guess what i wasnt supposed to find while vacuuming today

>>56088651
gj senpai keep it up proud of you

>>56089693
De-nga-and

>>56089750
Is it an acronym?

>>56089718
Starving isn't something to encourage

>>56089784
Post your fat... I mean healthy and well fed wrist then.

>>56089771
Shortform from :dengan

>>56090005
6'5" mountain climber
>>56089658
That's my wrist

>>56090035
Cool thanks. I get a little confused at asiatic languages that use western characters, sometimes the series of letters don't make any sense to a European speaker.

>>56089784
>>56090243
Why do you think I starved myself? I just exercise and I still have 20kgs to lose before I hit ideal weight. Went from 150kgs to 107 right now. I am 6ft tall.

File: IMG_20160813_231926.jpg (768KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

768KB, 1600x1200px

WAY/wt/, senpai?

File: 8e4cde1214be7f7b84e400e7ec45c460[1].png (26KB, 912x318px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 912x318px

Soon..

>>56089434

Casio just best watches for people without any interest in watches as a hobby.

Lots of good value fire and forget solutions to timekeeping.

File: your watch.jpg (32KB, 615x409px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 615x409px

>>56090728

Both of these are terrible mistakes.

>>56090599
Hey that's a good effort, just me being a pricks about third world countries and lack of food is all, I had no idea you started as a fat bastard

>>56091284
my boss have 3 patek 2 richard mille

sometime he wear gold face A159W stainless steel

>>56091589
>2 richard mille

Your boss is a faggot with shit taste.

File: 0401160851.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>56082585
SARB017

>>56089481

F-91W is the best army watch.
You don't have to worry about damaging it and if it breaks, you just buy a new one.

Are there any electronic watches like iWatch or other that you can have multiple time zones displayed on the face at once, and it is customizable? Like I'd want to have 3-5 different times on the face and be able to choose which ones are displayed. Thanks.

>>56091997
Pebble watch.
Turn off bluetooth and it should last around 30-45 days on a single charge.

File: P1030525.jpg (63KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 1024x768px

>>56082585
I'm probably going to get a SARB 035 next month. It's just a timeless beauty.

>>56089543
Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't higher bph generally improves accuracy by making the escapement/balance wheel less sensitive to gravity.

File: watchface-01-world.png (35KB, 249x401px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 249x401px

>>56092083
Thanks this layout seems perfect. I need to check these watches in person though and see how fedora they are.

>>56088604
Your local watchmaker is a tosser that is trying to scam you out of 125$ for servicing a simple 7s26. Not a mark against Seiko, hence a shitty argument.

>>56088583
Vostok is not an ISO certified diver. Not a mark against Seiko, hence a shitty argument.

>>56088604
That's what I do. I just buy Seikos at flea markets around Tokyo for ~3000 yen and when they stop in a few years throw them out and get a new one.

>>56088690
Not being loyal by stating obvious facts assholes like you have hard time comprehending. So, fuck off in dance moves.

>>56088754
It will get fixed, and all will be right with the world. So? A lot of companies sometimes have QC issues.

>>56092249
Please explain the physics behind that thinking.

BTW I just adjusted a JLC Atmos using 1 bpm. Accuracy isn't too shabby.

File: 13627983_185949371823272_1437751866_n.jpgig_cache_key=MTMxNzMyMDUwMDc3NDk1NjUzMQ==.jpg (110KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 1080x1080px

Wayde van Niekerk smashed the 400m world record last night to clinch the gold medal at the 2016 Rio Olympics .Van Niekerk was spotted wearing a Richard Mille RM 27-02 'Tourbillion-Rafael Nadal' | limited to 50 pieces
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Price - UK List Price £550,000

File: IMG_20160128_194129~01.jpg (264KB, 960x1280px) Image search: [Google]

264KB, 960x1280px

>>56089136
Yes, sir.

>>56089202
>>56089267
Copied an anon from here and got this Hadley Roma strap for it. It's like it was made just for it.

>>56092765

the fuck

>>56092342
Do you even know what the criteria are? It's not as if they went for the certification and failed.

File: 1467608872538.jpg (32KB, 620x400px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 620x400px

>>56092765
>limited to 50 pieces
Thank god.

>>56092765

I still can't believe he broke Michael Johnsons 20 year old record.

Adrenaline is a hell of a drug

Is Page&Cooper reputable?

Why do I see them selling watches brand new for $500 cheaper than on Chrono24

>>56092882
look into the definition of grey market dealers

>>56089658
You might as well just bought a new Rolex if you had to replace the case. $2500 is a decent price to pay though, I expect to pay $6k at least on a 114060.

>>56089673
Decent looking seiko, and you probably spared it from being used in a suicide bomb attempt.

>>56093222
If the case and service was all that was required, from how it reads, it seems $2500 is the price after the new case and service. Which would be a steal.

>>56093255
Yea avg. price on a 20 year old sub is around $4k to 4.5k overall a good price. Especially since its directly from Rolex.

>>56093271
Amazing watch at an amazing price. I'd say he did well.

Hell, would still say he did well if he got it for $4k after service and new case.

>>56093293
If it has an original bracelet he would have done well, the $4k price I listed usually come with a somewhat average condition bracelet.

Am I the only newfag that is shocked by how inaccurate these expensive watches are? Like losing multiple seconds everyday is not very good. How are people ok with this?

>>56093324
Even then, I think at this point most Sub owners don't care for the bracelet, almost everyone I see uses that same "Rubber 'b'" strap that anon has.

Hell, owner of a toy shop near here got his new Sub last week, As of next week he's ordering in a Rubber 'b' for it.

But I know what you mean anyway, whether or not the bracelet gets used is irrelevant as to the cost and material value.

>>56093379
Then feel free to buy Quartz.
I buy mechanical because I'm fascinated with the engineering behind them, and I'm not autistic enough to where a watch being 5 seconds off will bother me.
What a watch may gain one day, it could very lose the next, and at the end of the month, the watch may be a minute out. It doesn't get to be a problem unless you let it get to 5 minutes, then it can fuck with your plans if everything is 5 minutes awry.

>>56093428
How accurate are quartz?

>>56093448
Very.

>>56093476
This irks me then. Intentionally buying something that works less well simply because it's more complicated and more expensive or whatever is pretty silly.

>>56093379
So let's say a watch ticks 8 times a second, and it's fast by about 2.5 seconds per day. That's suppose to be 28,800 ticks every hour, but it's actually doing 28,800.83333. Literally less than one extra tick for nearly 15 thousand oscillations. In all, on the whole day, instead of 691,200 ticks it would be 691220.

After 5 days it would be up to 12.5 seconds fast. 100 extra ticks on the normal ~3.5 million. And if your watch hacks the solution would be to pull the crown for 12 seconds and then push it back in to put you back at sub-second precision. Basically no effort at all.

They're very accurate.

>>56092820
I do, but do you, headfuck?

>>56093379

I was shocked when I got into watches as well, but then you start reading about how watches work and their history, and it's actually fucking amazing that some of them only lose a few seconds per day.

Time keeping as it turns out is really hard. It took humanity eons to get truly accurate time keeping technology. And that involved understanding the unseen laws of the universe.

If you want accuracy, look at the Seiko springdrive movements.

>>56093519
No effort at all? Having to reset your watch every few days is effort.

>>56093502
Then, what are you doing here, you underage 10$ Casio cuck?

>>56093548
Some people like their watches and don't mind interacting with them.

Besides, it can be done while at a red light or on the toilet. It's nothing.

>>56093561
So a $10 casio keeps better time than your $8000 rolex and he's the cuck? Hahaha. You guys are complete tossers.

>>56093502
To buy anything simple because
>It's more expensive
Is such a bullshit line and should never relate to anything. Lord above no one in this thread is that far up their own ass as to buy something simply because it's expensive.

However, to buy something because it is more complicated, well, that depends on if you appreciate the engineering behind something.

If you're buying purely for accuracy, then just go digital, but a good looking digital is near impossible to come by.
A good looking Quartz isn't that hard to come across, but they're often sold cheap, as is a virtue of the quartz movement, and you can feel this in the quality of the materials used.

You can often tell the quality of something from how it feels in your hand, the weight, the materials, the build, these are things you can tell instantly on a good mechanical watch, and it is very easy to very quickly fall in love with those things, and frankly, those are things that are very hard to find, or simply do not exist in quartz watches.

You guys jumped the shark. This thread has no business being on /g/ as you've just admitted your fancy watches are nothing more than jewelry pieces that keep awful time. There is ZERO technology relevant discussion happening here if you are not talking about the most accurate timepiece movements available. Take it to >>>/fa/

I can't believe I lurked this bullshit for the last week.

>>56093664
Thanks for the input, newfag.

>>56093664
>for the last week.
Lurk more faggot

Or perhaps you would rather go back to the advanced technological discussions taking place in the Desktop thread?
Perhaps the homescreen thread?
Or the 50 shitpost threads?

This thread is the closest thing to technology that has been discussed on this shithole board for the past 5 years.

File: 616739046_RHKkr-L.jpg (102KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 800x600px

>>56093716
I rather enjoy these threads way more than the other shitpost attention whoring homescreen, desktop and battlestation threads. Wristwatch check1!!

File: dcfc3f0e1346458ab8f4407585f0c613[1].png (27KB, 909x262px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 909x262px

YES!
YES!
YES!

COME ON YOU GLORIOUS BASTARDS, GIVE ME MY WATCH ALREADY.

File: em7e001b-3[1].jpg (69KB, 960x638px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 960x638px

>>56093786
Currently wearing pic related.

But my OVM just got dispatched.

File: helm vanuatu.jpg (97KB, 1067x1600px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 1067x1600px

-Brushed 316L Stainless Steel
-Sapphire crystal
-Seiko Instruments NH35
-Divers 300M ISO 6425:1996
$250
I just bought one, tell me how I fucked up /k/.

File: 1471221149310.gif (2MB, 400x224px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 400x224px

>>56093624
>a good looking digital is near impossible to come by.
This makes me sad.

>>56093868
That bezel looks terrible off set..

It is rotated, yes, by the top is off by 1 click (Assuming 120 point locking) but the bottom of it lines up nearly with the minutes indices.

>>56093820
See you in another three weeks.

>>56093921
Come again?

File: 01_F1.jpg (114KB, 1244x829px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 1244x829px

>>56093907
That's the V1, the V2 they fixed this issue. They will also send you out a new bezel if you still own a V1. The bezel can be replaced using a knife.

>>56093944
Steinhart takes forever to ship their watches.

>>56093820
>Steinhart fake Rolex
Ugh why do people do this to themselves...

File: alang_image.2098548.jpg (194KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 1024x768px

>>56093868
No sir, I don't like it.

>>56093900

>>56093973
>That's the V1, the V2 they fixed this issue.
Fair enough.

Cool of them to send a replacement bezel too.

Not a huge fan of the hour and minute hands, but they aren't too bad I guess.

Bracelet looks like shit though.

>>56093995
When you drop 6 figures on a 5517, then you can call people out for wearing a homage. Until then just keep sucking them dicks. Fukboi.

>>56093986
If they got their payments sorted out, then they could dispatch the same day, hell, look at the image, payment was received today, 5 days after the order being made. And the watch was dispatched 4 hours later.

>>56093999
Engineer bracelet is desirable now a days, quite frankly I don't even know if this thing will fit me its fucking huge. Also plan to order a blue OB to go with the Helm. Then I will be done with watches this year because I will have my beater rotations:

Seiko Perpetual Calendar Titanium - Monday
Seiko SKX - Tuesday
Seiko Recraft - Wednesday
Helm Vanuatu - Thursday
Suunto Core - Friday(this will probably change because I hate how fast I need to change the battery on this thing)

Rolex Submariner - weekender golfing, deep sea fishing(this scares me), all around going out and looking beautiful watch
Sinn 556 - for my lounging around doing yardwork watch

>>56094014
Homage is just a nice name for "fake" you can probably get a better watch off the streets of Bangkok.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBFI8ScdE4E

>>56094107
Good to know that 90% of seiko's range are fake rolexes then.

File: LRM_EXPORT_20160714_131705.jpg (2MB, 1413x2512px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1413x2512px

>>56093900

>>56094136
Are you pretending to be retarded?

>>56094136
The fuck are you going on about? Seiko don't make fake Rolex, they look nothing alike also Seiko make quartz watch mainly. Look who is sucking Rolex's cock now...

Steinshit is shit bro, I own an OVM Ver 1 luckily I sold it. They don't know a damn thing about making watches. For example do you know that you can adjust the date on an OVM? Yea that's how amateur a brand they are.

I honestly respect people who buy $20 Casio watches more than the dumbshits that buy fake Rolexes for $300+ dollars.

>>56082452
watchmakerfag here, seagulls are the best of chiense production, they are somewhat reliable, and look good to a layman, but compared to anything other than china they are still rubiish tier, also their finishes like their cote-des-geneve make me want to stab my eyes

>>56094204
Doesn't take a "watchmaker" to know this.

>>56094024
Shipping and communication is hit or miss with them, I hear. When I ordered my Nav-B, they cleared my payment the same day and put my order through. Still took them two weeks to ship it out. They once had a wait-time for their watches of more than a month just because their staff got the sniffles.

>>56082685
yeah, but real eta 2824 use incablock instead of kif trior springs

File: IMG_20151001_011702~01.jpg (226KB, 960x1280px) Image search: [Google]

226KB, 960x1280px

>>56094151
Thinking of getting one of those, but I was hoping for something not as rugged.

File: 1468075348035.jpg (10KB, 547x480px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 547x480px

>>56093996
>$120k

i dont know if this is the correct thread, i want suggestions since im planning to buy a smartwatch, mainly going to use it for cheating at exams on subjects im really bad at (yes im retarded), cheap would be nice and if i can buy it on aliexpress it would be cool, wifi, bluetooth. thanks in advance

what watch would you be comfortable wearing in a warehouse environment that doesn't make you look like a complete weeb retard?

File: 5028d46b5adac2c1846c30983c4f624a.jpg (128KB, 460x1130px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 460x1130px

>>56094325

>>56094325
Examiners aren't that stupid kid.
Ever since touchscreen Shuffles could be fitted to wrist bands, they've been having them removed before exams.

Also,
>You must be at least 18 years of age to use this website

File: 51r-zEvlhSL._UX342_.jpg (26KB, 342x362px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 342x362px

>>56094340

>>56094325
>proctors forces anon to remove watch place it on table
>anon is a nigger and goes to a nigger community college
>stupid so is the last one out
>failed the test
>comes out
>hey where is my watch?!
>where is my iPhone!?
>shiiieeeettt a nigga can't have anything man... fuck the police!

File: pebble.jpg (33KB, 572x1017px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 572x1017px

is this acceptable

File: 1.jpg (119KB, 1430x603px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 1430x603px

I don't know this guy is, but some old fart legendary watch maker is designing a brand new Speedy! Can't wait.

>>56094421
>tfw I had to pawn an Omega Speedmaster Professional with a box signed by Neil Armstrong
>it was either keep the watch or starve to death
I chose to eat, this was in the 80s when I was just out of college. Still remember the day.

>>56094453
The human body can go up to a month without food, so the fuck are you complaining about?

My Pebble Steel didn't take too kindly to being run over. Should I get a Time or wait for the Time 2?

>>56093868
Price said $275 + shipping and to the US that's $35. Not very cheap if you asked me.

>>56094453
>it was either keep the watch or starve to death
Ironically that's Buzz Aldrin's thought as he designs it.

>>56094796
I bet he has a pension from NASA still...

>>56094825
They garnished the wages of the Apollo astronauts to pay for the rocket fuel. He still owes NASA a couple billion.

>>56086440
>>56086899
the model is chingchong 12847-fake-a-matic

>>56094421
>wearing something made by a guy who wear these disusing bracelets.

File: me3099.jpg (250KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

250KB, 600x600px

I can get this for $83 and I think it looks neat. how wrong am I?

>>56095171
I think these skeletion watches often look tacky.

>>56093582
Bad b8, peasant.

File: 15-51-54.jpg (105KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 720x1280px

Please help me decide between blue and black guys.

>>56095171
It looks like turd, but if you like it then get it.

>>56093868
Mismatched lume fucks me off.

>>56094453
>pawn an Omega Speedmaster Professional with a box signed by Neil Armstrong

pls dear lord, not like this, NOT like this...

>>56095250
serious question... do they look tacky for what they are or do they look tacky in context? I'm pretty new to this. I wouldn't wear something like this to a formal event, but I think it looks interesting for a daily beater.

>>56095291
Whats your ideal watch aesthetic? just for reference.

>>56095297
That's the V1, we are in V2 now >>56093973. Also its mainly just aesthetic fixes besides the crappy loose bezel which Helm fixed for free for V1 owners.

>>56094292
The bracelet is utter shit. Also they are not nice enough to be worth the inflated prices, only buy if less than $150. Make sure you get a model from the more recent production otherwise the perpetual calendar is no good anymore. The temperature function is effectively useless unless you take it off for at least 10 minutes. They look fucking cool though, I get tons of compliments when I wear mine.

File: marinec.44_roman_1kx1k_01.jpg (204KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 1000x1000px

>>56095401
>Whats your ideal watch aesthetic? just for reference.
My ideal watch aesthetic is irrelevant but the watch you posted looks like it would come out of one of those stupid gumball machine you still find in Mexican supermarket. If you insist on a watch that displays its movement then this is something reasonable with a relatively good movement and materials.

>>56095171
>>56095250
That's not an skeleton watch, that's an open heart and an really shitty one. Don't buy that steaming pile of shit

>>56095524
>it's almost like people have different tastes
I know, I get it. I was just wondering. Also the watch you posted looks like something a 60 year old would wear. I'm not even half way to that point yet, lol.

>>56095531
>an really
also do you have an recommendations in a similar price range or are you going to tell me anything under $3k is garbage?

>>56095524
>something reasonable with a relatively good movement and materials

No it isn't.

Should I buy another seiko 5 or move up to the next price bracket?

Is there an updated watch guide?

>>56095575
>show me your ideal aesthetics
You asked.

>>56095575
In your price rage a nice Seiko or Citizen are your best options.
However, you could go for a used one in the second hand market and find something interesting. If you do, come back and ask again before you buy it.

>an really
I erased a few negative adjectives before posting, but forgot the n.

>>56095580
Super Poorfag:
Seiko 5/Casio
Seiko quartz

Poorfag:
Seiko/Citizen divers

Kinda Poorfag:
Seiko Sumo and Turtle

Still poorfag:
Seiko Shogun/Samurai/Ninja whatever

Lower Middle class:
Oris
Sinn

Kinda middle, middle class:
Omega Speedmaster Professional/Automatic(don't get the automatic pls...)
Omega Seamaster(get the speedmaster, you're not fucking James Bond)

Upper middle class:
Rolex Datejust/Explorer/Submariner/Milgauss
Cartier Tank
JLC Reverso

Richfag:
Patek
Audemars
Piaget
IWC

Shit tier do not buy:
Steinshit
Tagshit
Movadoshit
Hamiltonshit
Radoshit
Those 90s Cartier that they decided to sell at Costco
Baume & Mercier

Here's a list off the top of my head.

>>56095401
Skeleton watches look tacky regardless of context. The only excuses for skeletonized watches is as exhibition prototypes, and to show off innovative escapements.

The Fossil you posted is neither. It's a generic, Chinese turd of a movement. If you want a cheap, nice, mechanical watch, look into Chinese/Korean brands who use Japanese movements.

The Miyota 9015 is a 3-hand automatic movement with a date complication, and it can be found in watches under $200.

File: justkillmenow.jpg (156KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 960x720px

>>56095670
>Omega
>not shit tier

File: Chinkshit.png (2MB, 1440x740px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1440x740px

>>56095670
>Recommending chinkshit sumo over OVM

>>56095575
>also do you have an recommendations in a similar price range
Yeah, get a Casio. The $83 price range is pure, pleb-tier, bullshit as far as mechanical watches are concerned.

Get a GW-M5610.

>>56095634
You made an effort to be less negative. That's the kind of attitude that gets you demoted around here. lol

I think Seiko and Citizen are decent enough in person, but most of the ones I can afford I just find really unremarkable to look at. I may add one to my collection some day, but for my first I kinda wanted something a little more unique.

>>56095692
I appreciate your candor, but I'm afraid the significance and craftsmanship of the movement is presently lost on me. Watches are something I just started looking at this year, I started with a G-Shock and then a smartwatch because I'm a big nerd and that's about where I am right now.

It probably sounds like I'm trying to find a reason to ignore most of what is being said in response to my posts, but it is helping.

>>56095741
Check the list again: especially at the shit tier level.

>>56095768
You can always try Lorus (Seiko brand)

File: Tudor-Pelagos-MT5612-blue-black-1.jpg (190KB, 860x631px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 860x631px

>>56095262
Blue has more character m8.

>>56095850
Blue has lower resale unfortunately something to consider when buying watches like these. Don't get me wrong, I love blue however if you buy it then buy it to keep. That being said BB has more character to me, this one looks like Rolex was just trying to make money off millennials and ex-Tag fags.

>>56095878
If fewer blues are sold, they'll possibly be worth more when the reference is discontinued.

>>56095768
>but I'm afraid the significance and craftsmanship of the movement is presently lost on me
A good reason not to buy anything until you know what you're looking at.

Just bought a 90s Seiko 5 from eBay. It ws only £20. Did I fuck up?

>>56096003
If it was from India you certainly did.

>>56091610
fuck yea. This anon has good taste!

File: Capture3.jpg (52KB, 600x439px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 600x439px

>>56093624
>You can often tell the quality of something from how it feels in your hand, the weight, the materials, the build... are things that are very hard to find, or simply do not exist in quartz watches.
Or just get a GS with a 9F movement and be done with it.

>>56096003
Seller is in the UK. Looked at the serial code on the back and according to this site, it was manufactured in Jan 1985.

http://www.watchsleuth.com/seikodatefinder/?mvmt=6309&case=7320&serial=511895

Tell me I did good, anon.

Also, I see loads of listings from India. Does that mean they're guaranteed to be fake as fuck?

>>56096602
meant for >>56096224

>>56095670
Pretentious shit list, obvious first month here, go die.

>>56096626
Shitty russian watch owner detected.

well I ordered a Fossil, not the one I posted earlier but from the same line. I'll be sure to come back here in a week to post pictures so that you can all rage at me for my terrible purchase :D

I think I might actually buy a watch box for my really luxurious casios, fossils, and polar heart rate monitors.

>>56096708
You're still a pretentious little faggot, go take your trading card-tier list back to Plebbit.

>>56096802
>gets easily triggered
>telling people to go back to safespace
I think it is you that need to go back to safespace.

File: patriarchie_opinions.jpg (161KB, 1280x787px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 1280x787px

>>56096837
>gets called out for making a "list" that's basically listing some brands in order of price, something a bot could do
>OMG U MAD???
Almost everything about your bullshit list is wrong.

File: https _blueprint-api-production.s3.amazonaws.com_uploads_card_image_177637_applwachbnd2.jpg (48KB, 950x530px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 950x530px

>>56095670
Not a bad list but you need to add Sinn to shit tier.

File: 1a16972208c38c3e940a0a80052ca528151caf04feedd0f4fef373dd6252dfab_1[1].jpg (40KB, 469x286px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 469x286px

>>56096800
>he still ordered a Fossil
>triggered

File: IMG_20150930_144140~01.jpg (180KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 1280x960px

>>56095491
Well, I got mine for about $170 late last year, so it wasn't too bad. Mine has the 8982 module, so going by a quick Google search, the perpetual calendar has until 2019. The temp and calendar aren't that big of a deal to me, though. I just love the way it looks. It's my only watch that's gotten compliments irl.

File: casio_f-100_sigourney_weaver.jpg (452KB, 1280x852px) Image search: [Google]

452KB, 1280x852px

>>56096898
I can't believe they didn't think about Alien-style.

File: Seiko-Giugiaro-7A28-ripley-watch-23.jpg (78KB, 860x459px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 860x459px

>>56096975
That pussy is long dead and shriveled...

File: CSevent.jpg (102KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 1024x683px

>>56095670
ok, the meme has got to end.

/g/, I will level with you just this once. I've had a good upbringing and been fortunate to meet a lot of successful people. About 3 years ago I started getting interested in watches and paying attention to which kind of watch other people wore. This is my conclusion; those that really have money will often have many watches, but most of the time they will prefer a simple, easy on the wrist, discrete and practical watch over a big bling rolex or 20m WR patek. The reason is that they don't want or need the attention, and for them, being able to spend 15k on a watch is a proof of nothing. While sailing, I've noticed many times that the guy with the smaller/cheaper boat will wear the bigger/more expensive watch, while the converse is also generally true. Poor people tend to look up to Rolex, LV-bags and Hermes scarfs as a sign of "I have made it", but these items are so common nowadays that they have lost what little distinction they ever had in the first place. Heck, even a bmw x6 or range rover is getting common. 'Fake it till you make it' is not about wearing a watch that represents 5% of your net worth. Remember, the people you want to impress will not be impressed by a rolex while the sort of people you dont want to impress are planning where to relieve you of it.

>>56093533
Yes. So do you actually think the certification makes a better diver's watch?
Do you also think COSC certification makes a watch more accurate?

>>56096969
Mine was $145 and even that felt like too much. I don't know sucker keep buying them up for over 200. What sort of band do you have it on? I'm using a perlon but I'm thinking about a mesh bracelet instead, too bad the endlinks are so fucking awful on the default bracelet or I'd definitely use that.

just look at that shameless shit
http://www.hagerwatches.com/aquamariner

>>56096898
this makes me feel a lot of things. I need some time to sort them out.

>>56096898
kys

>>56097089
And that loli is a fat pig now.

>>56092765
>was spotted
Yeah. Sure.

>>56094421
he's not a watchmaker. he walked on the moon.

>>56095262
The blue is too flat and bright, in pictures. Maybe it looks better in the flesh, but from what I've seen, it looks too plasticy and toyish.

>>56097176
>while the converse is also generally true.
>Converse
Inverse.

Unless you're talking about shoes.

>>56095670
>Piaget
they make so much cool shit yet they seem to be such a small brand
why

>>56097344
read more anon

con·verse (kən-vûrs′, kŏn′vûrs′)
adj.
Reversed, as in position, order, or action; contrary.

thefreedictionary.com/converse

>>56097382
>thefreedictionary.com
HAHAHAHA

>>56097194
ISO certification requires every single watch to be tested to 125% of its rated depth. This means you are going to get a watch that is far less likely to fail the first time you take it into the water. The same is true of COSC, does it make your watch more accurate? No, but it means every one was tested to meet a certain standard of accuracy instead of being a total crap shoot within the specs of the movement.

>>56097395
>>56097344


the converse [ S ]

the opposite:
In the US, you drive on the right-hand side of the road, but in the UK the converse applies.
However, the converse of this theory may also be true.

dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/converse

happy?

>>56097413
Sure. And it also means a watch can't be ISO certified because it doesn't have a bezel locking mechanism, even if it does survive 300% of its rated depth.
Not having the certification doesn't mean it's bad.

>>56093379
>Like losing multiple seconds everyday is not very good
>multiple seconds
Pffhahahaha.
>>56093502
>is pretty silly
Buying things you don't need is silly. Your point?

>>56097176
also, if we would spend half as much time on our education as we do on watches, we would all have comfy jobs within 5 years of graduation, with rolexes stapped on every wrist, leg, neck and dick if we so pleased.

>>56097176
>While sailing, I've noticed many times that the guy with the smaller/cheaper boat will wear the bigger/more expensive watch, while the converse is also generally true
I also sail, and in my experience, the people with the more expensive boats aren't even wearing a watch, if they need the time, they ask the nearest person.

But actual sport sailors (who are also considerably wealthy), tend to wear tool-watches or G-shocks on rubber/NATO straps. A lot of chronographs too, for timing maneuvers etc.

File: 20.png (342KB, 1366x626px) Image search: [Google]

342KB, 1366x626px

>>56097539
cant argue with you there, anon

>>56097176
If I were to buy a Rolex I would buy for me and not anyone else. Don't assume you can generalize everyone who ever wanted anything luxury. No I am not rich, however I am looking to buy a Submariner as a milestone to myself. That milestone is:

1. Graduate
2. Stable job
3. Buy a house in a decent neighborhood
4. Eliminate any debt

It literally took me a month of saving up and selling guns that I rarely shoot to get $6600. Now I just have to wait until a lightly used one to show up because I hate buying new.

>>56097628
fair point, but...
>I would buy for me and not anyone else
in my opinion this put you in a really small minority, i really dont think that this applies to the general population, in fact i think the general population would like to own a 0.6k phone to hint at a 6k watch to replace the 60k car they cant afford

>>56095878
Why is that the case when it looks more unique?

>>56097725
>replace
meant represent

>>56097628
also, congrats on reaching your milestone. im still at #1 on your list so it'll be a while before im getting that milestone present to myself

>>56097725
I drive a 60k car though, you need to move the goalpost a tiny bit further like a yacht maybe.

>>56097628
I completed step 3 after step 4 about 1 year ago and I just spent $95 on a watch today, which is the most I've ever spent on such a thing. That said, I kind of did the opposite of what you did... I plunged close to $1500 into NFA items!

Just curious, what all did you sell that was worth almost $7k?

File: f8cb51a3.jpg (162KB, 1279x1182px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 1279x1182px

>>56092113
Beware of dogshit-tier finish on the indices as exposed here. http://forums.watchuseek.com/f21/one-watch-rule-them-all-sarb035-729756-3.html#/topics/729756?_k=d6mrek

May just be a QC slip up, but it seems like the Alpenis has the best finishing of automatic Seikos below Presage grade.

Speaking of Presage, I'm going to make a very short write-up of the SARX019 after ~48 hours of ownership, stay tuned.

File: 20326-5128915.jpg (126KB, 1000x666px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 1000x666px

>>56098157
haha, yep

File: IMG_0614.jpg (209KB, 960x1280px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 960x1280px

I'm interested in buying a Seiko Sarb... the 065 Cocktail to be specific, however I'm concerned about it having a 40mm case. I have very small wrists, 5.5" around.

The photo is of me wearing a 35mm Timex Easy Reader. It measures about 41mm lug to lug.

>>56098159
Springfield MC Operator
Glock 19 gen 4
Glock 23 gen 4
Glock 30S
AR10 that I stopped shooting - next year its also illegal in my state and if I were to get a RAW I will only get a single one for my Daniel Defense.

Things I have left:
MK25
Glock 23 Gen 4
Dan Wesson PM7
Daniel Defense DDM4

>>56097425
>the converse [ S ]
>the opposite:
>In the US
Ameritards fucking up the language.
No, I'm not happy, fuck the US.

>>56098555
i'm from northern europe

>>56098426

Sorry to burst your bubble but a SARB065 will definitely be too big for you, hell a SARB033/035 might even be too big for you.

>>56098555
also, that is the dictionary of cambridge university

>>56098427
>change Glock 23 gen 3 sold kept Gen 4

>>56098605
Yes, but they clearly stated "in the US"

>>56094870
Rocket fuel is cheap as fuck.
Most of the time it's kerosene

>>56098426
Dude, go eat a sadwich or something, you look like a skeleton.

>>56098583
;_;
I was considering "settling" for the 033

>>56098649
i just had a sandwich tho

File: K2 black pyramid.jpg (3MB, 3872x2592px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3872x2592px

>>56098635
fucking hell anon, they used it as an example, read the whole sentence:
"In the US, you drive on the right-hand side of the road, but in the UK the converse applies."

>>56095171
You can get the exact same watch from the chinese before fossil stick their shit logo on it for about $10

File: TWO DOOR.jpg (3KB, 109x88px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 109x88px

>>56095262

>>56098664
Then eat three more.
How do you have enough strenght to type??
Did you made a pact with the dark one?

>>56098672
Can't you tell he is just trolling you into rage?

>>56098688
>cannot unseen
Fuck you asshole

>>56098699
hahah, i can now. im never really sure about the level of intelligence on this board

>>56098699
i'm at least stronger than a fatass, and most women.

File: ff_3568[1].jpg (55KB, 790x753px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 790x753px

>>56098726
facepalm

>>56098757
>i'm at least stronger than a fatass, and most women
Yeah, because you have an unnatural agreement, you skelly anon. (pic related)

File: tudor.png (21KB, 250x233px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 250x233px

>>56098688
>>56095262

>>56098427
Dang, bro. Move to a better state. I feel sad for you.

>>56097628
Honestly shop around I have seen subs going for just over 7k new you could probably talk people down to 6600 easy if they thought they were making a sale on the spot. Also talk to jewelers because they may know where a slightly used one is up for sale

>>56092331
Wut. Not the one you're replying to, but that's standard for 3-hand watches in my area (which is very competitive as there are multiple watchmakers in the same block in some places). Granted I've never brought in a "simple" 7s26 for service, but I'd imagine it's no less work than the typical ETA to service.

>>56098426
Holy fuck anon.
It's probably going to look took large.
It is very thin though so hides well under clothes

>>56098920
*too large

File: Waltham-Watches-–-Hail-Caesar-2020.jpg (149KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 1280x800px

>>56097628
A Quartz watch will be a much much more accurate timepiece and cost a lot less.

>>56098920
what do you think about a 38mm?

>>56094097
>weekender golfing
Ironically, golfing is among the most hazardous activities when it comes to risk of harm to your watch. If you hit dirt with your club, the shock traveling up your wrist could be enough to dislodge both spring bars. I've read multiple stories on various forums of ppl losing their watch/dislodging movement components with a bad swing.

>>56095722
>they made a few shit variants, which prevents me from buying a good one.

>>56094097
>>56099069
This is true. Don't golf with your watch on.

>>56099022
>>56099022
If the lug to lug is about 40mm you will be able to wear it, it won't look quite right but it won't be total retardation either

File: PC-padi56----viceroy1941yh2.jpg (153KB, 800x973px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 800x973px

>>56096898
See >>56099261
Rolex made the California, doesn't ruin the rest of their line up.